Skip to main content
Log in

The significance of spatial cognitive ability in robot-assisted surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Robot-assisted surgery using the da Vinci Surgical System provides three-dimensional images. However, no research has yet been done on the relationship between the system’s operation and spatial cognitive ability. This study focuses on the operator’s spatial cognitive ability which can impact acquisition of the skills required to operate the da Vinci Surgical System.

Methods

The participants of the study were 20 volunteers who were students at Hiroshima University (9 men and 11 women, average age 21.1 ± 1.6 years). Depending on the mental rotation test’s score the participants were divided into two groups, one with High group (n = 10), and the other with Low group (n = 10). Both groups were tested using Hiroshima University endoscopic surgical assessment device (HUESAD) and the da Vinci Surgical System simulator dV-Trainer.

Results

HUESAD; No significant difference was noted between the two groups in terms of smoothness (p = 0.3867). In terms of accuracy and spatial cognitive ability, the High group scored significantly lower values than the Low group. dV-Trainer; In terms of overall Score, no significant difference was seen between the two groups (pick and place: p = 0.1639; peg board: p = 0.1883; thread the rings: p = 0.8928; suture sponge: p = 0.3238).

Conclusions

This study indicates that differences in spatial cognitive ability have no impact at the initial stages to operate the da Vinci Surgical System. Despite this, it should be repeated that the da Vinci Surgical System is not something that facilitates simple surgery that can be implemented by anyone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, Bressel M, Lynch AC (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2095–2101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P, Shi C, Zou Y, Qin H, Ma Y (2012) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:3727–3736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Inan I, Morel P (2009) Impact of IQ, computer-gaming skills, general dexterity, and laparoscopic experience on performance with the da Vinci surgical system. Int J Med Robot 5:327–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Lee JY (2011) The da Vinci® Surgical System overcomes innate hand dominance. J Endourol 25:1385–1388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kolozsvari NO, Andalib A, Kaneva P, Cao J, Vassiliou MC, Fried GM, Feldman LS (2011) Sex is not everything: the role of gender in early performance of a fundamental laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 25:1037–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Suleman R, Yang T, Paige J, Chauvin S, Alleyn J, Brewer M, Johnson SI, Hoxsey RJ (2010) Hand-eye dominance and depth perception effects in performance on a basic laparoscopic skills set. JSLS 14:35–40

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams BJ, Margaron F, Kaplan BJ (2012) Comparing video games and laparoscopic simulators in the development of laparoscopic skills in surgical residents. J Surg Educ 69:714–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jungmann F, Gockel I, Hecht H, Kuhr K, Räsänen J, Sihvo E, Lang H (2011) Impact of perceptual ability and mental imagery training on simulated laparoscopic knot-tying in surgical novices using a Nissen fundoplication model. Scand J Surg 100:78–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects. Science 171:701–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Egi H, Okajima M, Yoshimitsu M, Ikeda S, Miyata Y, Masugami H, Kawahara T, Kurita Y, Kaneko M, Asahara T (2008) Objective assessment of endoscopic surgical skills by analyzing direction-dependent dexterity using the Hiroshima University endoscopic surgical assessment device (HUESAD). Surg Today 38:705–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Egi H, Tokunaga M, Hattori M, Ohdan H (2012) Evaluating the correlation between the HUESAD and OSATS score: concurrent validity study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 22:144–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, Macrae H, Murnahan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Egi H, Okajima M, Kawahara T, Yoshimitsu M, Sumitani D, Tokunaga M, Takeda H, Itamoto T, Ohdan H (2010) Scientific assessment of endoscopic surgical skills. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19:30–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tokunaga M, Egi H, Hattori M, Yoshimitsu, Sumitani D, Kawahara T, Okajima M, Ohdan H (2012) Approaching time is important for assessment of endoscopic surgical skills. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 21:142–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB, Cai J, Ng CK, Aron M, Gill IS, Desai MM (2011) Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery Simulator. J Urol 186:1019–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Perrenot C, Perez M, Tran N, Tran N, Jehl JP, Felblinger J, Bresler L, Hubert J (2012) The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills. Surg Endosc 26:2587–2593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Huynh VB, Etafy M, McDougall EM (2012) Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator—role as an assessment tool? J Urol 187:998–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Egi H, Hattori M, Tokunaga M, Suzuki T, Kawaguchi K, Sawada H, Ohdan H (2013) Face, content and concurrent validity of the mimic dV-Trainer for robot assisted endoscopic surgery:a prospective study. European Surgical Resarc 50:292–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadière GB, Nyssen AS (2006) Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da vinci robotic system. Acta Chir Belg 106:662–664

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Hiroyuki Egi, Minoru Hattori, Takahisa Suzuki, Hiroyuki Sawada and Hideki Ohdan have no competing interests or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Egi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Egi, H., Hattori, M., Suzuki, T. et al. The significance of spatial cognitive ability in robot-assisted surgery. Surg Endosc 29, 1130–1136 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3773-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3773-6

Keywords

Navigation