Skip to main content
Log in

Totally robot-assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: single dock technique and technical outcomes

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) requires operating in three different abdominal quadrants. Previous techniques have used either two docks or a hybrid technique in which the robot is used only to suture the duodeno-ileal anastomosis, while the rest of the operation was performed laparoscopically. Recently, a modification in technique has allowed all operative steps to be completed robotically with a single dock. The operative technique and its technical results are described.

Methods

Operative technique is described. Baseline demographics, operative duration, length of stay, and adverse events (intraoperative, 30-days, and 1-year) of all primary totally robot BPD/DS cases are reported.

Results

From Nov. 2011 to Jan. 2014, 59 totally robotic BPD/DS operations were attempted. One was completed hybrid, and the rest were totally robotic. No robotic operation was converted to an open operation. Five trocars were placed, the small bowel was anchored to the anterior abdominal wall, and the robot was docked. Mean age was 44 ± 10 years with a mean preoperative BMI of 56 ± 9 kg/m2. 69 % was female, and 71 % was Caucasian. Mean operative duration was 306 ± 80 min (60 min less than the hybrid technique). There were no mortality, leaks, venous thromboembolism, or bleeding requiring transfusion. Mean length of stay was 4.6 ± 4.3 days. Three patients were readmitted for nausea and vomiting. There was one superficial wound infection, and three patients needed reoperations in the first year, two for strictures, and one for debriding a suture abscess.

Conclusions

All key technical components of the BPD/DS were performed with low morbidity and mortality with a single dock. Since the surgeon performed all key parts of the operation from the console, the need for experienced bedside assistance was minimized, resulting in shorter operative duration compared to the hybrid technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL (2012) Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 307(5):491–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DeMaria EJ, Pate V, Warthen M, Winegar DA (2010) Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery-designated Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6(4):347–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scopinaro N, Gianetta E, Civalleri D, Bonalumi U, Bachi V (1979) Bilio-pancreatic bypass for obesity: 1. An experimental study in dogs. Br J Surg 66(9):613–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hess DS, Hess DW (1998) Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg 8(3):267–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marceau P, Biron S, Bourque RA, Potvin M, Hould FS, Simard S (1993) Biliopancreatic diversion with a new type of gastrectomy. Obes Surg 3(1):29–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marceau P, Hould FS, Simard S, Lebel S, Bourque RA, Potvin M et al (1998) Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. World J Surg 22(9):947–954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Prachand VN, Davee RT, Alverdy JC (2006) Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or = 50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. Ann Surg 244(4):611–619

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M (2000) Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 10(6):514–523 discussion 24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim WW, Gagner M, Kini S, Inabnet WB, Quinn T, Herron D et al (2003) Laparoscopic vs. open biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a comparative study. J Gastrointest Surg 7(4):552–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sudan R, Puri V, Sudan D (2007) Robotically assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch: a new technique. Surg Endosc 21(5):729–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Biertho L, Lebel S, Marceau S, Hould FS, Lescelleur O, Moustarah F et al (2013) Perioperative complications in a consecutive series of 1000 duodenal switches. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9(1):63–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sudan R, Bennett KM, Jacobs DO, Sudan DL (2012) Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Ann Surg 255(5):940–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng JJ, Gagner M (2002) Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Semin Laparosc Surg 9(2):125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rabkin RA, Rabkin JM, Metcalf B, Lazo M, Rossi M, Lehmanbecker LB (2003) Laparoscopic technique for performing duodenal switch with gastric reduction. Obes Surg 13(2):263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramos AC, Galvao Neto M, Santana Galvao M, Carlo A, Canseco E, Lima M et al (2007) Simplified laparoscopic duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3(5):565–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Topart P, Becouarn G, Ritz P (2012) Comparative early outcomes of three laparoscopic bariatric procedures: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8(3):250–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baltasar A (2007) Hand-sewn laparoscopic duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3(1):94–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 292(14):1724–1737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Topart P, Carles M, Hebuterne X, Gugenheim J (2013) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by duodenal switch in selected patients versus single-stage duodenal switch for superobesity: case-control study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9(4):531–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sudan R, Kasotakis G, Betof A, Wright A (2010) Sleeve gastrectomy strictures: technique for robotic-assisted strictureplasty. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6(4):434–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Dr Ranjan Sudan and Dr Erica Podolsky have not disclosures to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranjan Sudan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sudan, R., Podolsky, E. Totally robot-assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: single dock technique and technical outcomes. Surg Endosc 29, 55–60 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3653-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3653-0

Keywords

Navigation