Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intramucosal carcinoma of the rectum can be safely treated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery; clinical support of the revised Vienna classification

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The revised Vienna criteria were proposed for classifying rectal neoplasia and subsequent treatment strategies. Restaging intramucosal carcinoma to a non-invasive subgroup seems logical, but clinical support is lacking. In this study, we investigated whether distinction between intramucosal carcinomas (IMC) and rectal adenoma (RA) is of clinical relevance and whether these neoplasms can all be similarly and safely treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

Methods

All consecutive patients with IMC and RA, treated with TEM between 1996 and 2010 in tertiary referral centre for TEM were included. Long-term outcome of 88 IMC was compared to 356 pure rectal adenomas (RA). Local recurrence (LR) rate was the primary endpoint. Risk factors for LR were analysed.

Results

LR was diagnosed in 7/88 patients (8.0 %) with IMC and in 33/356 patients with primary RA (9.3 %; p = 0.700) and LR-free survival did not differ (p = 0.438). Median time to recurrence was 10 months (IQR IMC 5–30; RA 6–16). Overall recurrence occurred mainly in the first 3 years (38/40; 95 %). None of the LR revealed malignancy on pathological evaluation. No differences could be found in complication rates (IMC 9 %; RA 13 %; p = 0.34). Metastases did not occur in either group. Independent risk factors for LR were irradical margins at final histopathology (HR 2.32; 95 % CI 1.17–4.59; p = 0.016) and more proximal tumours (HR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.77–0.92; P = <0.001).

Conclusion

In this study, IMC of the rectum and RA have similar recurrence rates. This supports the revised Vienna classification. Both entities can be safely treated with TEM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin GL, Meng WC, Lau PY et al (2006) Local resection for early rectal tumours: comparative study of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) versus posterior trans-sphincteric approach (Mason’s operation). Asian J Surg 29:227–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maslekar S, Pillinger SH, Sharma A et al (2007) Cost analysis of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumours. Colorectal Dis 9:229–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Winde G, Nottberg H, Keller R et al (1996) Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 39:969–976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Langer C, Liersch T, Suss M et al (2003) Surgical cure for early rectal carcinoma and large adenoma: transanal endoscopic microsurgery (using ultrasound or electrosurgery) compared to conventional local and radical resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:222–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. De Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, Tollenaar RA et al (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus total mesorectal excision of T1 rectal adenocarcinomas with curative intention. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:1280–1285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schlemper RJ, Itabashi M, Kato Y et al (1998) Differences in the diagnostic criteria used by Japanese and Western pathologists to diagnose colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 82:60–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y et al (2000) The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 47:251–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schlemper RJ, Kato Y, Stolte M (1999) Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma or dysplasia of the gastric epithelium: rationale for a new classification system. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 83:62–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J et al (1984) [A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation] Das System fur die transanale endoskopische Rectumoperation. Chirurg 55:677–680

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. de Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, Stassen LP et al (2002) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 38:904–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dixon MF (2002) Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited. Gut 51:130–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA et al (2012) Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 107(9):1315–1329 quiz 1314, 1330

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lane N (1976) The precursor tissue of ordinary large bowel cancer. Cancer Res 36:2669–2672

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sumner HW, Wasserman NF, McClain CJ (1981) Giant hyperplastic polyposis of the colon. Dig Dis Sci 26:85–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper HS, Patchefsky AS, Marks G (1979) Adenomatous and carcinomatous changes within hyperplastic colonic epithelium. Dis Colon Rectum 22:152–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Urbanski SJ, Kossakowska AE, Marcon N, Bruce WR (1984) Mixed hyperplastic adenomatous polyps–an underdiagnosed entity. Report of a case of adenocarcinoma arising within a mixed hyperplastic adenomatous polyp. Am J Surg Pathol 8:551–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Frazin G, Zamboni G, Scarpa A et al (1984) Hyperplastic (metaplastic) polyps of the colon. A histologic and histochemical study. Am J Surg Pathol 8:687–698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jass JR (1980) Metaplastic polyps and polyposis of the colorectum. Histopathology 4:579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jass JR (1983) Relation between metaplastic polyp and carcinoma of the colorectum. Lancet 1:28–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Quirke P, Risio M, Lambert R et al (2012) European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition–Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy 44(Suppl 3):SE116–SE130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Maria Verseveld, Renée M. Barendse, Elvira L. Vos, Imro Dawson, Eelco J.R. de Graaf and Pascal G. Doornebosch have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Verseveld.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verseveld, M., Barendse, R.M., Dawson, I. et al. Intramucosal carcinoma of the rectum can be safely treated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery; clinical support of the revised Vienna classification. Surg Endosc 28, 3210–3215 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3593-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3593-8

Keywords

Navigation