Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of esophagojejunostomy after totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy using a trans-orally inserted anvil: a single-center comparative study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although laparoscopic surgery is frequently performed for the treatment of gastric cancer, laparoscopic total gastrectomy is not widely performed because of its technical difficulty. Since December 2007 we have performed esophagojejunostomy after totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) in more than 110 cases in our institution by using a circular stapler with a trans-orally inserted anvil. We performed a single-center comparative study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of esophagojejunostomy using a trans-orally inserted anvil in patients who underwent TLTG for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Methods

In the present study, we examined 329 patients with gastric cancer who underwent esophagojejunostomy using a circular stapler after total gastrectomy. Data on the clinicopathological features, operative time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of anastomosis-related complications among the surgical groups were obtained by reviewing the medical records, which were then analyzed.

Results

Approximately 67 % of the patients were men, and the average patient age was 64.0 years (range 26–93 years). In addition, 166 (50.5 %) and 163 (49.5 %) patients underwent open and laparoscopic surgery, respectively. Leakage following esophagojejunostomy was noted in 7 (4.2 %) of 166 patients who underwent total gastrectomy with open laparotomy, and 0 of 46 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG). However, only 2 (1.7 %) of 117 patients who underwent TLTG using a trans-orally inserted anvil exhibited leakage following esophagojejunostomy. Anastomotic stenosis of the esophagojejunostomy was observed in 5 (3.0 %) of 166 patients who underwent total gastrectomy with open laparotomy, 2 (4.3 %) of 46 patients who underwent LATG, and 2 (1.7 %) of 117 patients who underwent TLTG using a trans-orally inserted anvil.

Conclusions

We believe that esophagojejunostomy using a trans-orally inserted anvil after TLTG for gastric cancer is a safe and useful surgical procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ballesta-Lopez C, Bastida-Vila X, Catarci M, Mato R, Ruggiero R (1996) Laparoscopic Billroth II distal subtotal gastrectomy with gastric stump suspension for gastric malignancies. Am J Surg 171:289–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Pique JM, Delgado S, Campo E, Bordas JM et al (1995) Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 9:1101–1105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ziogas D, Polychronidis A, Kanellos I, Roukos D (2009) Laparoscopic colectomy survival benefit for colon cancer: is evidence from a randomized trial true? Ann Surg 249:695–696 author reply, 697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, Kishida S, Ogata A, Fujiwara Y et al (2007) Laparoscopic gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for upper gastric cancer. Br J Surg 94:204–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer (2008) GLOBOCAN 2008: cancer incidence and mortality worldwide 2008. http://globocan.iarc.fr/. Accessed 18 March 2013

  6. Sierra A, Regueira FM, Hernandez-Lizoain JL, Pardo F, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, A-Cienfuegos J (2003) Role of the extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery: experience in a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol 10:219–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roukos DH, Lorenz M, Encke A (1998) Evidence of survival benefit of extended (D2) lymphadenectomy in western patients with gastric cancer based on a new concept: a prospective long-term follow-up study. Surgery 123:573–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giovanetti M, Brotto AC, Tiberio GA, Campedelli L, Vettoretto N, Ronconi M et al (1999) D2 lymphectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer: a retrospective view on our experience (1990–1997). J Exp Clin Cancer Res 18:455–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lygidakis NJ (1981) Total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: a retrospective study of different procedures and assessment of a new technique of gastric reconstruction. Br J Surg 68:649–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Inberg MV, Heinonen R, Lauren P, Rantakokko V, Viikari SJ (1981) Total and proximal gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric carcinoma: a series of 305 cases. World J Surg 5:249–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Kasai Y, Kanyama Y, Hibi K, Ito K et al (2003) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection for early gastric carcinoma: a review of 43 cases. J Am Coll Surg 196:75–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uyama I, Sakurai Y, Komori Y, Nakamura Y, Syoji M, Tonomura S et al (2005) Laparoscopy-assisted uncut Roux-en-Y operation after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 8:253–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeong O, Ryu SY, Zhao XF, Jung MR, Kim KY, Park YK (2012) Short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume center. Surg Endosc 26:3418–3425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY (2011) Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 104:734–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Isozaki H, Okajima K, Ichinona T, Hara H, Fujii K, Nomura E (1997) Risk factors of esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 44:1509–1512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeong O, Park YK (2009) Intracorporeal circular stapling esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 23:2624–2630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hirahara N, Monma H, Shimojo Y, Matsubara T, Hyakudomi R, Yano S et al (2011) Reconstruction of the esophagojejunostomy by double stapling method using EEA OrVil in laparoscopic total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy. World J Surg Oncol 9:55

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  20. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, Kishida S, Ogata A, Fujiwara Y et al (2006) Respiratory function after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: an index of minimally invasive surgery. World J Surg 30:1211–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawamura H, Okada K, Isizu H, Masuko H, Yamagami H, Honma S et al (2008) Laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer targeting as a less invasive procedure. Surg Endosc 22:81–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Strong VE, Devaud N, Allen PJ, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit D (2009) Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1507–1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Varela JE, Hiyashi M, Nguyen T, Sabio A, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Am J Surg 192:837–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mochiki E, Kamiyama Y, Aihara R, Nakabayashi T, Asao T, Kuwano H (2005) Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: five years’ experience. Surgery 137:317–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim MG, Kawada H, Kim BS, Kim TH, Kim KC, Yook JH et al (2011) A totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with gastroduodenostomy (TLDG) for improvement of the early surgical outcomes in high BMI patients. Surg Endosc 25:1076–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. So KO, Park JM (2011) Totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy using intracorporeally hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy. J Gastric Cancer 11:206–211

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wada N, Kurokawa Y, Takiguchi S, Takahashi T, Yamasaki M, Miyata H et al (2014) Feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 17:137–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zuiki T, Hosoya Y, Kaneda Y, Kurashina K, Saito S, Ui T et al (2013) Stenosis after use of the double-stapling technique for reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 27:3683–3689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liao GQ, Ou XW, Liu SQ, Zhang SR, Huang W (2013) Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with trans-orally inserted anvil (OrVil): a single institution experience. World J Gastroenterol 19:755–760

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kunisaki C, Makino H, Oshima T, Fujii S, Kimura J, Takagawa R et al (2011) Application of the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 25:1300–1305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are extremely grateful to all the patients, as well as the clinical staff who cared for these patients. We also thank Dr. Shigeharu Hamatani for his reliable pathological diagnoses.

Disclosures

Drs. Hiroaki Ito, Haruhiro Inoue, Noriko Odaka, Hitoshi Satodate, Manabu Onimaru, Haruo Ikeda, Daisuke Takayanagi, Kenta Nakahara, and Shin-ei Kudo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Funding sources

This research received no specific grant from any public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1 Chigasakichuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, 224-8503, Japan

    Hiroaki Ito, Haruhiro Inoue, Noriko Odaka, Hitoshi Satodate, Manabu Onimaru, Haruo Ikeda, Daisuke Takayanagi, Kenta Nakahara & Shin-ei Kudo

Authors
  1. Hiroaki Ito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haruhiro Inoue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Noriko Odaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hitoshi Satodate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Manabu Onimaru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Haruo Ikeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daisuke Takayanagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kenta Nakahara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shin-ei Kudo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroaki Ito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ito, H., Inoue, H., Odaka, N. et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of esophagojejunostomy after totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy using a trans-orally inserted anvil: a single-center comparative study. Surg Endosc 28, 1929–1935 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3417-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3417-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation