Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer: the influence of hospital volume on complications and length of stay

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Little information is available about the relationship between hospital volume and the clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of hospital volume on clinical outcomes of ESD using a national administrative database.

Methods

A total of 27,385 patients treated with ESD for gastric cancer were referred to 867 hospitals between 2009 and 2011 in Japan. We collected patients’ data from the administrative database to compare ESD-related complications and length of stay (LOS) in relation to hospital volume. Hospital volume was categorized into three groups based on the number of cases treated over the study period: low-volume hospitals (LVHs, <50 cases), medium-volume hospitals (MVHs, 50–100 cases), and high-volume hospitals (HVHs, >100 cases). These analyses were performed for each location of gastric cancer [upper (cardia and fundus), middle (body), and lower third (antrum and pylorus)].

Results

Significant differences in ESD-related complications among the three hospital volume categories were observed for upper gastric cancer (6.5 % in LVHs vs. 5.2 % in MVHs vs. 3.4 % in HVHs; p = 0.017). Multiple logistic regression revealed that HVHs were significantly associated with decreased relative risk of ESD-related complications in upper gastric cancer (odds ratio for HVHs 0.51; 95 % confidence interval, 0.31–0.83, p = 0.007). However, no significant differences for ESD-related complications were seen for middle and lower gastric cancers among the different hospital volume categories (p > 0.05). Additionally, hospital volume was significantly associated with a decreasing LOS for all locations of gastric cancers (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The present study has demonstrated that hospital volume was mainly associated with clinical outcome in patients with ESD for upper gastric cancer. Further studies for successive monitoring of outcomes of ESD should be conducted in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Inoue M, Tsugane S (2005) Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Japan. Postgrad Med J 81:419–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin Y, Ueda J, Kikuchi S, Totsuka Y, Wei WQ, Qiao YL, Inoue M (2011) Comparative epidemiology of gastric cancer between Japan and China. World J Gastroenterol 17:4421–4428

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I, Mouri R, Hirata M, Kawamura T, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2006) Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 64:877–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim M, Jeon SW, Cho KB, Park KS, Kim ES, Park CK, Seo HE, Chung YJ, Kwon JG, Jung JT, Kim EY, Jang BI, Lee SH, Kim KO, Yang CH; Daegu-Kyungpook Gastrointestinal Study Group (DGSG) (2013) Predictive risk factors of perforation in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 27:1372–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Ono S, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Oka M, Ogura K, Kawabe T, Ichinose M, Omata M (2007) Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:678–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Repici A, Hassan C, Carlino A, Pagano N, Zullo A, Rando G, Strangio G, Romeo F, Nicita R, Rosati R, Malesci A (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a prospective Western series. Gastrointest Endosc 71:715–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oda I, Gotoda T, Hamanaka H, Eguchi T, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Bhandari P, Emura F, Saito D, Ono H (2005) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: technical feasibility, operation time and complications from large consecutive series. Dig Endosc 17:54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung IK, Lee JH, Lee SH, Kim SJ, Cho JY, Cho WY, Hwangbo Y, Keum BR, Park JJ, Chun HJ, Kim HJ, Kim JJ, Ji SR, Seol SY (2009) Therapeutic outcomes in 1,000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 69:1228–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, Gao Y, Mo Z, Gao F (2009) Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy 41:751–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gotoda T, Friedland S, Hamanaka H, Soetikno R (2005) A learning curve for advanced endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 62:866–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oda I, Odagaki T, Suzuki H, Nonaka S, Yoshinaga S (2012) Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer based on trainee experience. Dig Endosc 24:129–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kato M, Gromski M, Jung Y, Chuttani R, Matthes K (2013) The learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection in an established experimental setting. Surg Endosc 27:154–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murata A, Matsuda S, Mayumi T, Yokoe M, Kuwabara K, Ichimiya Y, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2011) A descriptive study evaluating the circumstances of medical treatment for acute pancreatitis before publication of the new JPN guidelines based on the Japanese administrative database associated with the Diagnosis Procedure Combination system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:678–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murata A, Matsuda S, Mayumi T, Yokoe M, Kuwabara K, Ichimiya Y, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2011) Effect of hospital volume on clinical outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis, based on a national administrative database. Pancreas 40:1018–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murata A, Matsuda S, Kuwabara K, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2011) An observational study using a national administrative database to determine the impact of hospital volume on compliance with clinical practice guidelines. Med Care 49:313–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murata A, Matsuda S, Mayumi T, Okamoto K, Kuwabara K, Ichimiya Y, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2012) Multivariate analysis of factors influencing medical costs of acute pancreatitis hospitalizations based on a national administrative database. Dig Liver Dis 44:143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bouvier AM, Esteve J, Mitry E, Clinard F, Bonithon-Kopp C, Faivre J (2002) Trends in gastric cancer incidence in a well-defined French population by time period and birth cohort. Eur J Cancer Prev 11:221–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Inoue M, Sasazuki S, Wakai K, Suzuki T, Matsuo K, Shimazu T, Tsuji I, Tanaka K, Mizoue T, Nagata C, Tamakoshi A, Sawada N, Tsugane S; Research Group for the Development and Evaluation of Cancer Prevention Strategies in Japan (2009) Green tea consumption and gastric cancer in Japanese: a pooled analysis of six cohort studies. Gut 58:1323–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sundararajan V, Henderson T, Perry C, Muggivan A, Quan H, Ghali WA (2004) New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 57:1288–1294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43:1130–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gotoda T, Yamamoto H, Soetikno RM (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol 41:929–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim YJ, Park DK (2011) Management of complications following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Endosc 3:67–70

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lian J, Chen S, Zhang Y, Qiu F (2012) A meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 76:763–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Durairaj L, Torner JC, Chrischilles EA, Vaughan Sarrazin MS, Yankey J, Rosenthal GE (2005) Hospital volume-outcome relationships among medical admissions to ICUs. Chest 128:1682–1689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Osler M, Iversen LH, Borglykke A, Mårtensson S, Daugbjerg S, Harling H, Jørgensen T, Frederiksen B (2011) Hospital variation in 30-day mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in Denmark: the contribution of hospital volume and patient characteristics. Ann Surg 253:733–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sugihara M (2010) Survival analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighted methods based on the generalized propensity score. Pharm Stat 9:21–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Feng P, Zhou XH, Zou QM, Fan MY, Li XS (2012) Generalized propensity score for estimating the average treatment effect of multiple treatments. Stat Med 31:681–697

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gilligan MA, Neuner J, Zhang X, Sparapani R, Laud PW, Nattinger AB (2007) Relationship between number of breast cancer operations performed and 5-year survival after treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Am J Public Health 97:539–544

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lecuyer L, Chevret S, Guidet B, Aegerter P, Martel P, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E (2008) Case volume and mortality in haematological patients with acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 32:748–754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cudnik MT, Sasson C, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Zhang J, Bobrow BJ, Spaite DW, McNally B, Denninghoff K, Stolz U (2012) Increasing hospital volume is not associated with improved survival in out of hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac etiology. Resuscitation 83:862–868

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub DA, Dunn RL, Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Montie JE, Underwood W 3rd, Wei JT (2006) The effects of adjusting for case mix on mortality and length of stay following radical cystectomy. J Urol 176:1363–1368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Csikesz NG, Singla A, Murphy MM, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2010) Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 55:2398–2405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hotta K, Oyama T, Akamatsu T, Tomori A, Hasebe O, Nakamura N, Kojima E, Suga T, Miyabayashi H, Ohta H (2010) A comparison of outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasms between high-volume and low-volume centers: multi-center retrospective questionnaire study conducted by the Nagano ESD Study Group. Intern Med 49:253–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Williams SC, Koss RG, Morton DJ, Schmaltz SP, Loeb JM (2008) Case volume and hospital compliance with evidence-based processes of care. Int J Qual Health Care 20:79–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Toyonaga T, Nishino E, Hirooka T, Ueda C, Noda K (2006) Intraoperative bleeding in endoscopic submucosal dissection in the stomach and strategy for prevention and treatment. Dig Endosc 18:123–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yoshinaga S, Gotoda T, Kusano C, Oda I, Nakamura K, Takayanagi R (2008) Clinical impact of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial adenocarcinoma located at the esophagogastric junction. Gastrointest Endosc 67:202–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong SK, Sung JJ, Lau JY, Ng EK (2010) Difficulties and outcomes in starting endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 24:1049–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sugimoto T, Okamoto M, Mitsuno Y, Kondo S, Ogura K, Ohmae T, Mizuno H, Yoshida S, Isomura Y, Yamaji Y, Kawabe T, Omata M, Koike K (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an effective and safe therapy for early gastric neoplasms: a multicenter feasible study. J Clin Gastroenterol 46:124–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Provenzale D, Ofman J, Gralnek I, Rabeneck L, Koff R, McCrory D (2003) Gastroenterologist specialist care and care provided by generalists—an evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency. Am J Gastroenterol 98:21–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Murata A, Matsuda S, Kuwabara K, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2010) Impact of hospital volume on clinical outcomes of endoscopic biliary drainage for acute cholangitis based on the Japanese administrative database associated with the Diagnosis Procedure Combination system. J Gastroenterol 45:1090–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yamamoto Y, Fujisaki J, Ishiyama A, Hirasawa T, Igarashi M (2012) Current status of training for endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm at cancer institute hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, a famous Japanese hospital. Dig Endosc 24:148–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ahn JY, Choi KD, Choi JY, Kim MY, Lee JH, Choi KS, Kim do H, Song HJ, Lee GH, Jung HY, Kim JH (2011) Procedure time of endoscopic submucosal dissection according to the size and location of early gastric cancers: analysis of 916 dissections performed by 4 experts. Gastrointest Endosc 73:911–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gotoda T (2007) Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 10:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ohta T, Ishihara R, Uedo N, Takeuchi Y, Nagai K, Matsui F, Kawada N, Yamashina T, Kanzaki H, Hanafusa M, Yamamoto S, Hanaoka N, Higashino K, Iishi H (2012) Factors predicting perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 75:1159–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N et al (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut 58:331–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kusano C, Iwasaki M, Kaltenbach T, Conlin A, Oda I, Gotoda T (2011) Should elderly patients undergo additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer? Long-term comparative outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1064–1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Okada K, Fujisaki J, Yoshida T, Ishikawa H, Suganuma T, Kasuga A, Omae M, Kubota M, Ishiyama A, Hirasawa T, Chino A, Inamori M, Yamamoto Y, Yamamoto N, Tsuchida T, Tamegai Y, Nakajima A, Hoshino E, Igarashi M (2012) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 44:122–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Isomoto H (2010) Global dissemination of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Intern Med 49:251–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Goda K, Fujishiro M, Hirasawa K, Kakushima N, Morita Y, Oda I, Takeuchi M, Yamamoto Y, Uedo N (2012) How to teach and learn endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal neoplasm in Japan. Dig Endosc 24:136–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fujishiro M, Jung HY, Goda K, Hirasawa K, Kakushima N, Lee IL, Morita Y, Oda I, Takeuchi M, Yamamoto Y, Zhou PH, Uedo N (2012) Desirable training and roles of Japanese endoscopists towards the further penetration of endoscopic submucosal dissection in Asia. Dig Endosc 24:121–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Research on Policy Planning and Evaluation from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan.

Disclosures

Atsuhiko Murata, Kohji Okamoto, Keiji Muramatsu and Shinya Matsuda have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan

    Atsuhiko Murata, Keiji Muramatsu & Shinya Matsuda

  2. Department of Surgery, Yahata Municipal Hospital, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan

    Kohji Okamoto

Authors
  1. Atsuhiko Murata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kohji Okamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keiji Muramatsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shinya Matsuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsuhiko Murata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murata, A., Okamoto, K., Muramatsu, K. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer: the influence of hospital volume on complications and length of stay. Surg Endosc 28, 1298–1306 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3326-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3326-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation