Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of fenestrations and surface profiling on the holding of tissue by parallel occlusion laparoscopic graspers

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite the importance of efficient grasping during laparoscopic surgery, the published literature on jaw features, e.g., fenestrations and surface profiling on grasping efficiency defined as resistance to slip without inflicting trauma, is limited.

Methods

Various surface geometries of the jaws were tested with respect to (i) inclusion of fenestrations; (ii) surface contact to fenestration area ratio, and (iii) surface profiling of the jaws. Various loads were applied to the tissue which was subsequently pulled at a constant rate until free from the jaws. The maximal force necessary to pull the tissue free was recorded. The jaws were designed for use in parallel-occlusion graspers to avoid the well documented high pinch forces encountered with pivoted occlusion.

Results

At all applied forces the force needed to pull tissue from any fenestration design was significantly higher than the force necessary to pull tissue from non-fenestrated jaws (p < 0.05) with no significant differences between the three fenestration designs. The ratio of surface contact to fenestration area must exceed 1:0.4 to achieve a significant increase in the tissue retention. All the profiles studied were made using a single fenestration and with a surface contact to fenestration area ratio of 1:0.8. All such profile designs studied performed significantly better than the control (p < 0.005). The ratio of the mean retraction to applied force across all load conditions tested were 1.23:1.0 and 1.7:1.0 for the waved and toothed profile respectively, with standard deviations for the corresponding retraction force of ±0.45 and ±0.38 respectively.

Conclusions

The retention efficiency of laparoscopic graspers is improved by fenestration which must, however, exceed a certain ratio (>1.0:0.4). Likewise surface profiling of the jaws enhances retention efficiency and its design (tooth, waved, mixed) directly influences the amount of pressure needed to retain tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shakeshaft AJ et al (2001) A curved edge moderates high pressure generated by a laparoscopic grasper. Surg Endosc 15(10):1232–1234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cartmill JA et al (1999) High pressures are generated at the tip of laparoscopic graspers. Aust N Z J Surg 69(2):127–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heijnsdijk EAM, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ (2002) Effectiveness of grasping and duration of clamping using laparoscopic graspers. Surg Endosc 16(9):1329–1331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Voort M, Heijnsdijk EAM, Gouma DJ (2004) Bowel injury as a complication of laparoscopy. Br J Surg 91(10):1253–1258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Visser H et al (2002) Forces and displacements in colon surgery. Surg Endosc 16(10):1430–14263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heijnsdijk EAM et al (2005) Fenestrations in the jaws of laparoscopic graspers. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14(1):45–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marucci DD et al (2000) Patterns of failure at the instrument–tissue interface. J Surg Res 93(1):16–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heijnsdijk EAM et al (2004) Slip and damage properties of jaws of laparoscopic graspers. Surg Endosc 18(6):974–979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frank TG, Cuschieri A (1997) Prehensile atraumatic grasper with intuitive ergonomics. Surg Endosc 11(10):1036–1039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heijnsdijk EAM et al (2003) Inter- and intraindividual variabilities of perforation forces of human and pig bowel tissue. Surg Endosc 17(12):1923–1926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown A et al (2012) PVDF to detect and autonomously prevent slip during retraction in laparoscopic surgery. Society for American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, San Diego, CA, 3–7 March 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the grant support from the Engineering and Physics Research Council of the UK, under Grant EP/HO 10033/1.

Disclosures

Andrew W. Brown, Stuart I. Brown, Donald Mclean, Zhigang Wang, Alfred Cuschieri have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfred Cuschieri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, A.W., Brown, S.I., Mclean, D. et al. Impact of fenestrations and surface profiling on the holding of tissue by parallel occlusion laparoscopic graspers. Surg Endosc 28, 1277–1283 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3323-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3323-7

Keywords

Navigation