Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of endoscopic resection for high-grade dysplasia and esophageal cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an important advance in the management of esophageal tumors. It has been used successfully for superficial esophageal cancer and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) arising out of Barrett epithelium.

Methods

From a single institution within the Department of Surgery, patients who underwent ER for esophageal tumors between December 2001 and January 2012 were evaluated. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic variables were collected and reviewed.

Results

We identified 81 patients who underwent ER for esophageal lesions. Median patient age was 69 years, and the median follow-up was 3.25 years. In patients with HGD, at the time of last endoscopy, the complete eradication rate of HGD was 84 % and cancer-specific survival was 100 %. During surveillance, one patient developed an invasive carcinoma that required endoscopic therapy. Patients with T1a and negative deep margins on ER had a recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival of 100 %. There were seven patients with T1b and negative margins on ER. Three patients underwent esophagectomy; final pathology revealed no residual malignancy or lymph node metastasis. Two patients had definitive chemoradiation, and two patients were observed. To date, there has been no cancer recurrence. In all patients who underwent ER, there was one episode of bleeding that required endoscopic treatment and admission for observation.

Conclusions

ER can be performed safely and can adequately stage and often treat patients with HGD and superficial cancers. Patients with HGD and T1a disease with negative margins are cured with ER alone. Observation and surveillance may be an option for select patients with low-risk, early submucosal disease (T1b) and negative margins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62(1):10–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ajani JA, Barthel JS, Bentrem DJ, D’Amico TA, Das P, Denlinger CS, Fuchs CS, Gerdes H et al (2011) Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 9(8):830–887

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hvid-Jensen F, Pedersen L, Drewes AM, Sørensen HT, Funch-Jensen P (2011) Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med 365(15):1375–1383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Inoue H, Takeshita K, Hori H, Muraoka Y, Yoneshima H, Endo M (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope for esophagus, stomach, and colon mucosal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 39(1):58–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peters JH, Watson TA (2011) Endoscopic mucosal resection of Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15(8):1299–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nijhawan PK, Wang KK (2000) Endoscopic mucosal resection for lesions with endoscopic features suggestive of malignancy and high-grade dysplasia within Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 52(3):328–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pech O, Behrens A, May A, Nachbar L, Gossner L, Rabenstein T et al (2008) Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 57(9):1200–1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peters FP, Kara MA, Rosmolen WD, ten Kate FJ, Krishnadath KK, van Lanschot JJB et al (2006) Stepwise radical endoscopic resection is effective for complete removal of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 101(7):1449–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ell C, May A, Pech O, Gossner L, Guenter E, Behrens A et al (2007) Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett’s cancer). Gastrointest Endosc 65(1):3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chennat J, Konda VJ, Ross AS, de Tejada AH, Noffsinger A, Hart J et al (2009) Complete Barrett’s eradication endoscopic mucosal resection: an effective treatment modality for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma—an American single-center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 104(11):2684–2692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ancona E, Rampado S, Cassaro M, Battaglia G, Ruol A, Castoro C et al (2008) Prediction of lymph node status in superficial esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 15(11):3278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nigro JJ, Hagen JA, DeMeester TR, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Oberg S et al (1999) Prevalence and location of nodal metastases in distal esophageal adenocarcinoma confined to the wall: implications for therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117(1):16–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sepesi B, Watson TJ, Zhou D, Polomsky M, Litle VR, Jones CE et al (2010) Are endoscopic therapies appropriate for superficial submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma? An analysis of esophagectomy specimens. J Am Coll Surg 210(4):418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunbar KB, Spechler SJ (2012) The risk of lymph-node metastases in patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 107(6):850–862

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Manner H, May A, Pech O, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, Günter E et al (2008) Early Barrett’s carcinoma with “low-risk” submucosal invasion: long-term results of endoscopic resection with a curative intent. Am J Gastroenterol 103(10):2589–2597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Manner H, Pech O, Heldmann Y, May A, Pohl J, Behrens A et al (2013) Efficacy, safety, and long-term results of endoscopic treatment for early-stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagus with low-risk sm1 invasion. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(6):630–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Dr. Nurkin is a consultant for Bitwise Analytics Inc., an IT software development company. Dr. Hochwald is a consultant for Ethicon Endosurgery. Dr. Khushalani is on an advisory board for Genentech, Elekta and Prometheus, on the speakers’ bureau for Prometheus, and obtained grant funding (for clinical trials) from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network through research funds from Roche, Allos, and Pfizer and from Merck, Pfizer (for investigator-initiated clinical trials).

Conflict of interest

Drs. LeVea, Nava, Bain, Nwogu, Yendamuri, and Wilding and Adrienne Groman have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven J. Nurkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nurkin, S.J., Nava, H.R., Yendamuri, S. et al. Outcomes of endoscopic resection for high-grade dysplasia and esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 28, 1090–1095 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3270-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3270-3

Keywords

Navigation