Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic pudendal nerve decompression and transposition combined with omental flap protection of the nerve (Istanbul technique): technical description and feasibility analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We aimed in this study to investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic pudendal nerve decompression and transposition (LaPNDT) in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain due to pudendal neuralgia. Pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) between the sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments is the most frequent etiology. We describe the technical details, feasibility, and advantages of a laparoscopic approach in patients with PNE.

Methods

Consecutive patients (n = 27) with a diagnosis of PNE underwent LaPNDT with omental flap protection in an effort to prevent re-fibrosis around the nerve in the long term. The degree of pain and pain impact were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the visual analog pain scale (VAS) and the Impact of Symptoms and Quality of Life.

Results

The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) follow-up of the 27 patients was 6.8 ± 4.2 months; 16 of the 27 were followed-up for more than 6 months. The mean (SD) operation time was 199.4 ± 36.1 (155–300) min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 39.7 ml. All patients were ambulated on the first postoperative day, and the mean (SD) hospitalization time was 2.1 ± 1.0 (1–6) days. The mean VAS scores of 27, 23, 16, and 6 patients were 1.5, 1.4, 1.6, and 2.0, postoperatively, at the first, third, sixth, and twelfth months (p < 0.0001). A more than reduction in VAS score (>80 %) was achieved in 13 of the 16 patients (81.2 %) who were followed-up for more than 6 months.

Conclusions

LaPNDT seems a feasible surgical modality for cautiously selected patients with PNE. In addition, using an omental flap for protection of the nerve is one of the most important technical advantages of laparoscopy. As a minimally invasive surgery, the laparoscopic approach can be technically feasible, with its promising preliminary results in the treatment of PNE. With further analysis, in the future it may open new frontiers for pudendal nerve neuromodulation as a new treatment modality in some intractable functional problems of the genitourinary tract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lazarou G, Grigorescu BA, Olson TR, Downie SA, Powers K, Mikhail MS (2008) Anatomic variations of the pelvic floor nerves adjacent to the sacrospinous ligament: a female cadaver study. Int Urogynecol J 19:649–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Insola A, Granata G, Padua L (2010) Alcock canal syndrome due to obturator internus fibrosis. Muscle Nerve 42:431–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Loukas M, Louis RG, Hallner B, Gupta AA, White D (2006) Anatomical and surgical considerations of the sacrotuberous ligament and its relevance in pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat 28:163–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Possover M (2009) Laparoscopic management of endopelvic etiologies of pudendal pain in 134 consecutive patients. J Urol 181:1732–1736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Loukas M, Louis RG, Tubbs S, Wartmann C, Colbom GL (2008) Intra-abdominal laparoscopic pudendal canal decompression: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc 22:1525–1532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, Marrero R, Hammady A, Seeman O, Rassweiler J (2004) Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis. Eur Urol 46:312–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Popeney C, Ansell V, Renney K (2007) Pudendal entrapment as an etiology of chronic perineal pain: diagnosis and treatment. Neurourol Urodyn 26:820–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi SS, Lee PB, Kim YC, Kim HJ, Lee SC (2006) C-arm-guided pudendal nerve block: a new technique. Int J Clin Pract 60:553–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Filler A (2009) Minimal access nerve surgery and interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 65:212–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Beco J, Climov D, Bex M (2004) Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology: a case series. BMC Surg 30:4–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shafik A, El Sibai O, Shafik IA, Shafik AA (2007) Role of sacral ligament clamp in the pudendal neuropathy (pudendal canal syndrome): results of clamp release. Int Surg 92:54–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robert R, Labat JJ, Bensignor M, Glemain P, Deschamps C, Raoul S, Hamel O (2005) Decompression and transposition of the pudendal nerve in pudendal neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial and long-term evaluation. Eur Urol 47:403–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Santos FI, Salinas J, Zarza D, Sancha FG, Almagro A (2010) Update on pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: an approach anatomic-surgical, diagnostic and therapeutic. Actas Urol Esp 34:500–509

    Google Scholar 

  14. Labat JJ, Riant T, Robert R, Amarenco G, Lefaucheur JP, Rigaud J (2008) Diagnostic criteria for pudendal neuralgia by pudendal nerve entrapment (Nantes Criteria). Neurourol Urodyn 27:306–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Dr. Vito Pansodoro, Professor Dr. Vincenzo Di Santo, and Associate Professor Dr. Evangelos Liatsikos for their kind support and technical ideas in developing this technique.

Disclosures

Tibet Erdogru, Egemen Avci, and Murat Akand declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tibet Erdogru.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erdogru, T., Avci, E. & Akand, M. Laparoscopic pudendal nerve decompression and transposition combined with omental flap protection of the nerve (Istanbul technique): technical description and feasibility analysis. Surg Endosc 28, 925–932 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3248-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3248-1

Keywords

Navigation