Abstract
Background
TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) has been proposed as an alternative to Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) for resection of benign polyps and early cancers of rectum. Since clinical application has begun in the absence of any experimental validation, we assessed its feasibility and efficacy ex vivo in a pilot study.
Methods
In a dedicated trainer box for transanal procedures, 10 surgeons with no experience in transanal surgery were asked to perform a dissection/suture task using both TAMIS and TEM in randomly allocated order. Surgeons were asked to dissect two identically drawn lesions of ~3 cm in larger diameter. Precision of dissection was assessed using a quantitative photographic method, while the time needed for dissection and suturing was considered a measure of quantitative evaluation. Each participant expressed a subjective opinion regarding difficulty with dissection, difficulty with suturing, vision quality, and conflict between instruments on a scale from 1 to 5.
Results
No difference was observed between the two techniques regarding the accuracy of dissection as the margin was interrupted along 4.1 % of the circumference in the TEM group compared with 2.48 % in the SILS group (P = 0.271). Dissection and suturing were significantly quicker in the TEM group [04:30 vs. 06:35 min (P = 0.049) and 14:34 versus 19:18 min (P = 0.003)]. In three cases in the SILS group, completing the suture was not considered possible, and the procedures were terminated by TEM. Subjective evaluation revealed a better appreciation of TEM in all proposed comparisons: dissection (2.6 vs. 3.5, P = 0.004), suturing difficulty (3.1 vs. 4.6, P < 0.001), quality of vision (2.3 vs. 2.8, P = 0.18), and instrument conflicts (3.1 vs. 4.0, P = 0.054).
Conclusions
In the ex vivo setting, both techniques were comparable for achieving a good dissection, although TAMIS failed to prove effective in suturing the rectal wall. Moreover, TEM was significantly quicker despite the small groups and was better appreciated by the surgeons.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J, Böbel M, Isselhard W, Pichlmaier H (1984) A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation. Chirurg 55:677–680
Buess G (1993) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). J R Coll Surg Edinb 38:239–245
Casadesus D (2009) Surgical resection of rectal adenoma: a rapid review. World J Gastroenterol 15:3844–3851
Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Caldart M, Festa F, Morino M (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms: experience of 300 consecutive cases. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1831–1836
Suppiah A, Maslekar S, Alabi A, Hartley JE, Monson JR (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer: time for a trial? Colorectal Dis 10:314–327
Bach SP, Hill J, Simson JN, Lane L, Merrie A, Warren B, Mortensen NJ, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) Collaboration (2009) A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:280–290
Vettoretto N, Arezzo A (2010) Human natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: on the way to two different philosophies? Surg Endosc 24:490–492
Middleton PF, Sutherland LM, Maddern GJ (2005) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 48:270–284
Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24:2200–2205
Lim SB, Seo SI, Lee JL, Kwak JY, Jang TY, Kim CW, Yoon YS, Yu CS, Kim JC (2012) Feasibility of transanal minimally invasive surgery for mid-rectal lesions. Surg Endosc 26:3127–3132
Lorenz C, Nimmesgern T, Back M, Langwieler TE (2010) Transanal single port microsurgery (TSPM) as a modified technique of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Surg Innov 17:160–163
Ragupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Trans-anal endoscopic video-assisted excision: application of single-port access. JSLS 15:53–58
Hayashi S, Takayama T, Yamagata M, Matsuda M, Masuda H (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery used to perform transanal endoscopic microsurgery (SILSTEM) for T1 rectal cancer under spinal anesthesia: report of a case. Surg Today 43(3):325–328
Smith RA, Anaya DA, Albo D, Artinyan A (2012) A stepwise approach to transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer using a single-incision laparoscopic port. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2859
Hompes R, Ris F, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ, Cahill RA (2012) Transanal glove port is a safe and cost-effective alternative for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg 99:1429–1435
Barendse RM, Doornebosch P, Bemelman W, Fockens P, Dekker E, de Graaf E (2012) Transanal employment of single access ports is feasible for rectal surgery. Ann Surg 256:1030–1033
Carrara A, Mangiola D, Motter M, Tirone A, Ghezzi G, Silvestri M, Zappalà O, Gasparetti F, Tirone G (2012) Glove port technique for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Int J Surg Oncol 2012:438450
Barendse RM, Doornebosch PG, Bemelman WA, Fockens P, Dekker E, de Graaf EJ (2012) Transanal single-port surgery: selecting a suitable access port in a porcine model. Surg Innov 19:323–326
Whiteford MH, Denk PM, Swanström LL (2007) Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 21:1870–1874
Khoo RE (2010) Transanal excision of a rectal adenoma using single-access laparoscopic port. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1078–1079
Dardamanis D, Theodorou D, Theodoropoulos G, Larentzakis A, Natoudi M, Doulami G, Zoumpouli C, Markogiannakis H, Katsaragakis S, Zografos G (2011) Transanal polypectomy using single incision laparoscopic instruments. World J Gastrointest Surg 3:56–58
Lorenz C, Nimmesgern T, Langwieler TE (2011) Transanal endoscopic surgery using different single-port devices. Surg Technol Int 21:107–111
Van den Boezem PB, Kruyt PM, Stommel MW, Tobon Morales R, Cuesta MA, Siestes C (2011) Transanal single-port surgery for the resection of large polyps. Dig Surg 28:412–416
Disclosure
Dr. Rimonda, Dr. Arolfo, Dr. Salvai and Prof. Morino, have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Prof. Arezzo is a consultant for Johnson & Johnson Medical (Cincinnati, OH, USA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rimonda, R., Arezzo, A., Arolfo, S. et al. TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) with SILS™ Port versus Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM): a comparative experimental study. Surg Endosc 27, 3762–3768 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2962-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2962-z