Skip to main content

Insights into fast-track colon surgery: a plea for a tailored program

Surgical Endoscopy volume 27, pages 1178–1185 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This retrospective study compared the fast-track colon surgery program to conventional perioperative care and assessed factors that influence postoperative length of stay.

Design

This retrospective study included 124 fast-track and 119 conventional care colon surgical patients. Exclusion criteria were primary rectal disease, stoma, American Society of Anesthesiologists score IV, and Association Française de Chirurgie index 3 or 4. Laparoscopy was the preferred approach. Variables influencing length of stay were analyzed by multivariate linear and logistic regression.

Results

Overall mortality and complication rates were not significantly different between groups (fast-track vs. controls 0 vs. 0.8 %, 30.6 vs. 38.6 % respectively). As expected, median length of stay was significantly reduced in fast-track patients (3 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001), but emergency readmission rate was higher (16.9 vs. 7.6 %, p = 0.026), although rehospitalization rates were similar (8 vs. 4.2 %, not significant). Independent risk factors of increased length of stay were identified as age >69 years (p = 0.001), laparotomy (p = 0.011), and conventional perioperative care (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The introduction of a fast-track program reduced postoperative length of stay without increasing complication rate. This study proposes a modulation of the program according to patient age and surgical approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Kehlet H, Mogensen T (1999) Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 86:227–230

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen J, Hjort-Jakobsen D, Christiansen PS, Kehlet H (2007) Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery. Br J Surg 94:890–893

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PBW, Hendry PO, Spies C, von Meyenfeldt MF, Fearon KCH, Revhaug A, Norderval S, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Dejong CHC, For the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Group (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore A, Remzi F, Hammel J, Fazio V (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46:851–859

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gatt M, Anderson ADG, Reddy BS, Hayward-Sampson P, Tring IC, MacFie J (2005) Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. Br J Surg 92:1354–1362

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khoo CK, Vickery CJ, Forsyth N, Vinall NS, Eyre-Brook IA (2007) A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg 245:867–872

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29:434–440

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PHP, Dejong CHC, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Aarts MA, Okrainec A, McLeod RS (2009) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg 13:2321–2329

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2011) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149:830–840

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Spanjersberg Willem R, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven Cornelis JHM (2011) Fast-track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD007635. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vlug MS, Wind J, van der Zaag E, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Bemelman WA (2009) Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis 11:335–343

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Abraham N, Albayati S (2011) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs hasten recovery after colorectal resections. World J Gastrointest Surg 3:1–6

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Slim K, Panis Y, Alves A, Kwiatkowski F, Mathieu P, Mantion G (2006) Predicting postoperative mortality in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. World J Surg 30:100–106

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaba A, Laurent SR, Detroz BJ, Sessler DI, Durieux ME, Lamy ML, Joris JL (2007) Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy. Anesthesiology 106:11–18

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Forget P, Lois F, de Kock M (2010) Goal-directed fluid management based on the pulse oximeter-derived Pleth Variability Index reduces lactate levels and improves fluid management. Anesth Analg 111:910–914

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, Delannoy B, Robin J, Bastien O, Lehot J–J (2008) Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth 101:200–206

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Raue W, Haase O, Junghans T, Scharfenberg M, Muller JM, Schwenk W (2004) ‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc 18:1463–1468

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis PP (2009) Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1119–1131

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bradshaw BGG, Liu SS, Thirlby RC (1998) Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg 186:501–506

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Proske JM, Raue W, Neudecker J, Müller JM, Schwenk W (2005) Réhabilitation rapide en chirurgie colique: résultats d’une étude prospective. Ann Chir 130:152–156

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Steel M, Garafalo T, Fazio VW (2004) Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 198:877–883

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Azimuddin K, Rosen L, Reed J, Stasik J, Riether R, Khubchandani I (2001) Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted. Dis Colon Rectum 44:942–946

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Delaney C (2008) Outcome of discharge within 24 to 72 hours after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51:181–185

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, Billesbølle P, Lund C, Mogensen T, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2005) Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241:416–423

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vlug MS, Wind JM, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF, Gerhards MF, van Wagensveld BA, van der Zaag ES, van Geloven AA, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Bemelman WA, on behalf of the collaborative LSG (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast-track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254(6):868–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Scharfenberg M, Raue W, Junghans T, Schwenk W (2007) “Fast-Track” rehabilitation after colonic surgery in elderly patients—is it feasible? Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1469–1474

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Kehlet H (2000) Rapid rehabilitation in elderly patients after laparoscopic colonic resection. Br J Surg 87:1540–1545

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the whole “Fast-Track” team of the St-Luc Hospital in Brussels for their invaluable assistance and Prof. C. Craddock-de Burbure for revising the manuscript.

Disclosures

Drs. Luca Pellegrino, Fernande Lois, Christophe Remue, Patrice Forget, Brigitte Crispin, Daniel Leonard, Jacques Jamart, and Alex Kartheuser have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, St-Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium

    L. Pellegrino, C. Remue, B. Crispin, D. Leonard & A. Kartheuser

  2. Department of Anaesthesiology, St-Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium

    F. Lois & P. Forget

  3. Department of Biostatistics, Cliniques Universitaires Mont-Godinne, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium

    J. Jamart

Authors
  1. L. Pellegrino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Lois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Remue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Forget
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B. Crispin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Leonard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. Jamart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. Kartheuser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kartheuser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pellegrino, L., Lois, F., Remue, C. et al. Insights into fast-track colon surgery: a plea for a tailored program. Surg Endosc 27, 1178–1185 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2572-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2572-1

Keywords

  • Fast-track surgery
  • ERAS
  • Colorectal surgery
  • Laparoscopy
  • Length of hospital stay
  • Postoperative complications