Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of transgastric peritoneal access on peritoneal innate cellular immunity: experimental study in swine

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

One of the main concerns of natural orifice surgery is the local and systemic impact on physiology. Few studies have compared natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with other surgical modalities. Most studies are based on systemic variables such as postoperative serum cytokines, with conflicting results. Surgical trauma induces an early inflammatory response, release of cytokines, and local leukocyte activation and oxidative burst. Major surgical trauma is related to impairment of phagocytic function and an increase in production of active oxygen species by phagocytes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of transgastric peritoneoscopy on peritoneal innate immune response compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy in swine.

Methods

Thirty-four male Sus scrofa domesticus swine were assigned to four groups: transgastric peritoneoscopy (13), laparoscopy (7), laparotomy (7), and sham procedure (7). Twenty-four hours after the procedure, peritoneal fluid cells were harvested by peritoneal washing after necropsy. Flow cytometry analysis of labeled S. aureus and E. coli phagocytosis by peritoneal neutrophils and macrophages was blindly performed. Oxidative burst activity measured by H2O2 production under different challenges was also evaluated.

Results

Total operative time varied between all groups. The transgastric, laparoscopy, and laparotomy groups required 56, 17.2, and 40.3 min of mean operative time, respectively (p < 0.05). Even though the mean percentage and intensity of phagocytosis by peritoneal phagocytes were higher in the sham, transgastric, and laparoscopy groups, there was no significant difference between these groups and laparotomy. Macrophage production of H2O2 has been shown to be similar among the transgastric, laparoscopy, and sham groups, and smaller than that in laparotomy (p < 0.05), either under basal conditions, while performing E. coli phagocytosis, or challenged by the presence of E. coli membrane lipopolysaccharide.

Conclusion

Under the conditions of this study, transgastric peritoneoscopy has been shown to have minimal impact on peritoneal innate immune response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rattner D (2006) Introduction to NOTES White Paper. Surg Endosc 20:185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. ASGE; SAGES (2006) ASGE/SAGES Working Group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery White Paper October 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 63:199–203

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bingener J, Krishnegowda NK, Michalek JE (2009) Immunologic parameters during NOTES compared with laparoscopy in a randomized blinded porcine trial. Surg Endosc 23:178–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubcenco E, Assumpcao L, Dray X, Gabrielson KL, Ruben DS, Pipitone LJ, Donatelli G, Krishnamurty DM, Baker JP, Marohn MR, Kalloo AN (2009) Adhesion formation after peritoneoscopy with liver biopsy in a survival porcine model: comparison of laparotomy, laparoscopy, and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Endoscopy 41:971–978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McGee MF, Schomisch SJ, Marks JM, Delaney CP, Jin J, Williams C, Chak A, Matteson DT, Andrews J, Ponsky JL (2008) Late phase TNF-alpha depression in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy. Surgery 143:318–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Trunzo JA, McGee MF, Cavazzola LT, Schomisch S, Nikfarjam M, Bailey J, Mishra T, Poulose BK, Lee Y-J, Ponsky JL, Marks JM (2010) Peritoneal inflammatory response of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) versus laparoscopy with carbon dioxide and air pneumoperitoneum. Surgical Endosc 24:1727–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shijo H, Iwabuchi K, Hosoda S, Watanabe H, Nagaoka I, Sakakibara N (1998) Evaluation of neutrophil functions after experimental abdominal surgical trauma. Inflamm Res 47:67–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vittimberga F, Foley D, Meyers W, Callery M (1998) Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Ann Surg 227:326–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshizumi F, Yasuda K, Kawaguchi K, Suzuki K, Shiraishi N, Kitano S (2009) Submucosal tunneling using endoscopic submucosal dissection for peritoneal access and closure in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a porcine survival study. Endoscopy 41:707–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Busque P, Higgins R, Sénéchal S, Marchand R, Quessy S (1998) Simultaneous flow cytometric measurement of Streptococcus suis phagocytosis by polymorphonuclear and mononuclear blood leukocytes. Vet Microbiol 63:229–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hasui M, Hirabayashi Y, Kobayashi Y (1989) Simultaneous measurement by flow cytometry of phagocytosis and hydrogen peroxide production of neutrophils in whole blood. J Immunol Methods 117:53–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Underhill D, Ozinsky A (2002) Phagocytosis of microbes: complexity in action. Annu Rev Immunol 20:825–852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Babior B (1984) The respiratory burst of phagocytes. J Clin Invest 73:599–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rattner D, Hawes R (2006) NOTES: gathering momentum. Gastrointest Endosc 63:838–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fish E (2008) The X-files in immunity: sex-based differences predispose immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 8(9):737–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Choudhry M, Bland K, Chaudry I (2007) Trauma and immune response–effect of gender differences. Injury 38:1382–1391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soeters P, Grimble R (2009) Dangers and benefits of the cytokine mediated response to injury and infection. Clin Nutr 28:583–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hazey J, Narula V, Renton D, Reavis K, Paul C, Hinshaw K, Muscarella P, Ellison E, Melvin W (2008) Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: Initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22(1):16–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Holzer K, Konietzny P, Wilhelm K, Encke A, Henrich D (2002) Phagocytosis by emigrated, intra-abdominal neutrophils is depressed during human secondary peritonitis. Eur Surg Res 34:275–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Redmond H, Hofmann K, Shou J, Leon P, Kelly C, Daly J (1992) Effects of laparotomy on systemic macrophage function. Surgery 111:647–655

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith J (1994) Neutrophils, host defense, and inflammation: a double-edged sword. J Leuk Biol 56:672–686

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lehrer R, Ganz T, Selsted M, Babior B, Curnutte J (1988) Neutrophils and host defense. Ann Intern Med 109:127–142

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Horton J, Walker P (1993) Oxygen radicals, lipid peroxidation, and permeability changes after intestinal ischemia and reperfusion. J Appl Physiol 74:1515–1520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bentes de Souza A, Rogers M, Wang C, Yuen P, Ng P (2003) Comparison of peritoneal oxidative stress during laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:65–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Menger M, Vollmar B (2004) Surgical trauma: hyperinflammation versus immunosuppression? Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:475–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. R. Rodrigues, M. Rezende, G. Gomes, F. Souza, M. Blagitz, A. Della Libera, M. Taha, A. Ferrari, and E. Della Libera have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ermelindo Della Libera Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodrigues, R., Rezende, M., Gomes, G. et al. Effect of transgastric peritoneal access on peritoneal innate cellular immunity: experimental study in swine. Surg Endosc 27, 964–970 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2541-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2541-8

Keywords

Navigation