Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does the surgeon’s experience influence the outcome of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess laparoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis with respect to the surgeon’s experience.

Methods

From January 1994 to December 2006, 130 patients underwent laparoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones found with intraoperative cholangiography. Two types of surgeons were defined: junior surgeons with fewer than ten laparoscopic common bile duct explorations performed and experienced surgeons with more than ten. The two patient populations (n = 65 in each group) were similar in regard to demographic data, clinical presentations (complicated or not), and ASA score.

Results

Results show that junior surgeons had significantly more patients with a common bile duct (CBD) diameter <7 mm compared to experienced surgeons (66 % vs. 38 %; p = 0.002). Primary closure of choledochotomy was performed by senior rather than junior surgeons significantly more often (87.5 % vs. 69 %; p = 0.05). Mean operating time was found to be longer for junior operators than for experienced surgeons (220 ± 71 min vs. 169 ± 71 min; p = 0.0006). There was no difference between group 1 (juniors) and group 2 (experienced surgeons) in regard to laparotomy conversion rate (9 % vs. 1.5 %; p = 0.1), complete common bile duct clearance (98 % vs. 100 %, p = ns), postoperative complications (two bile leaks in group 1 and one in group 2), and hospital stay (9 days vs. 7.5 days). In multivariate analysis, the transcystic approach was not influenced by the surgeon’s experience. Experienced surgeons performed choledochotomy with primary closure more easily [RR = 3 (range = 1.1–8); p = 0.04]. Complicated presentations [RR = 2 (0.7–3); p = 0.08] and CBD diameter [RR = 2.5 (0.96–7); p = 0.06] influenced the choice of type of closure of choledochotomy without any significant value.

Conclusion

Surgeon’s experience influenced operating time and type of choledochotomy closure performed but had no influence on postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kharbutli B, Velanovich V (2008) Management of preoperatively suspected choledocholithiasis: a decision analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12(11):1973–1980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petelin JB (2003) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17:1705–1715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berthou JC, Drouard F, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K (1997) Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 12:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Millat B, Atger J, Deleuze A, Briandet H, Fingerhut A, Guillon F, Marrel E, De Seguin C, Soulier P (1997) Laparoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a prospective evaluation in 247 consecutive unselected patients. Hepatogastroenterology 44(13):28–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Samie MA, Nassar AH (2010) Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24(7):1552–1556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leida Z, Ping B, Shuguang W, Yu H (2008) A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc 22(7):1595–1600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24(1):CD005641

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Towards T-tube-free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228:29–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Voitk AJ, Tsao SG, Ignatius S (2001) The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 182:250–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ludwig K, Lorenz D, Köckerling F (2002) Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common bile duct stones. ANZ J Surg 72:547–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tutton MG, Pawa N, Arulampalam TH, Motson RW (2010) Training higher surgical trainees in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. World J Surg 34(3):569–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bresadola V, Intini S, Terrosu G (2001) Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency in general surgery. Surg Endosc 15:812–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shamiyeh A, Wayand W (2005) Current status of laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common bile duct stones. Dig Dis 23(2):119–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebner S, Rechner J, Beller S, Erhart K, Riegler FM, Szinicz G (2004) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 18:762–765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. [No authors listed] (1998) Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference. Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (E.A.E.S). Surg Endosc 12(6):856–864

  17. Lyass S, Phillips EH (2006) Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 20(Suppl 2):S441–S445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tokumura H, Umezawa A, Cao H, Sakamoto N, Imaoka Y, Ouchi A, Yamamoto K (2002) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9(2):206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clayton ES, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E (2006) Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93(10):1185–1191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19:003327

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Herrero, Philippe, Guillon, Millat, and Borie have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, France

    Claire Philippe & Frédéric Borie

  2. Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Eloi Hospital, Montpellier, France

    Astrid Herrero, Françoise Guillon, Bertrand Millat & Frédéric Borie

  3. Chirurgie Digestive B, CHU Carémeau, Place du Pr Debré, 30029, Nîmes, France

    Frédéric Borie

Authors
  1. Astrid Herrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claire Philippe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Françoise Guillon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bertrand Millat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frédéric Borie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Astrid Herrero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrero, A., Philippe, C., Guillon, F. et al. Does the surgeon’s experience influence the outcome of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones?. Surg Endosc 27, 176–180 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2416-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2416-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation