Skip to main content
Log in

Rigid and flexible endoscopic rendezvous in spatium peritonealis may be an effective tactic for laparoscopic megasplenectomy: significant implications for pure natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We recently experienced 10 patients with cirrhosis who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy. A portion of these patients underwent dissection with a flexible endoscope in the peritoneal cavity. This pilot study mainly focused on the technical aspects and immediate results.

Methods

From November 2009 to September 2010, 10 patients with cirrhosis and hypersplenism were entered into this pilot study. They were indicated to undergo laparoscopic splenectomy to treat portal hypertension and to facilitate initiation and completion of either interferon therapy for liver cirrhosis or anticancer therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. To dissect the upper end of the gastrosplenic ligament and the marginal region between the left diaphragm and upper pole of the spleen, a flexible single-channel endoscope was introduced into the peritoneal cavity simultaneously with the use of a rigid laparoscope. Dissection with the flexible endoscope in the peritoneal cavity was performed using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife through the channel of the flexible endoscope.

Results

The flexible endoscope offered a magnified operative view, a water-jet lens cleaner, and a powerful lavage and suction capability. The upper end of the gastrosplenic ligament and the marginal region between the left diaphragm and upper pole of the spleen were easily seen, and dissection of these critical regions was smoothly conducted with articulation of the tip of the flexible endoscope, even in patients with splenomegaly. No patient experienced major intraoperative complications or required conversion to open surgery.

Conclusions

Dissection with a flexible endoscope in the peritoneal cavity may be an effective tactic for laparoscopic megasplenectomy, and significant implications for pure natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery have been raised. Although future randomized controlled prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings, surgeons might find this to be a typical example of an appropriate strategy for high-risk patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marks JH, Kawun UB, Hamdan W, Marks G (2008) Redefining contraindications to laparoscopic colorectal resection for high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 22:1899–1904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katkhouda N, Hurwitz MB, Rivera RT, Chandra M, Waldrep DJ, Gugenheim J, Mouiel J (1998) Laparoscopic splenectomy: outcome and efficacy in 103 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 228:568–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Donini A, Baccarani U, Terrosu G, Corno V, Ermacora A, Pasqualucci A, Bresadola F (1999) Laparoscopic vs open splenectomy in the management of hematologic diseases. Surg Endosc 13:1220–1225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Winslow ER, Brunt LM (2003) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a meta-analysis with an emphasis on complications. Surgery 134:647–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ (1999) Laparoscopic splenectomy. World J Surg 23:384–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klingler PJ, Tsiotos GG, Glaser KS, Hinder RA (1999) Laparoscopic splenectomy: evolution and current status. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Akahoshi T, Tomikawa M, Korenaga D, Ikejiri K, Saku M, Takenaka K (2010) Laparoscopic splenectomy with peginterferon and ribavirin therapy for patients with hepatitis C virus cirrhosis and hypersplenism. Surg Endosc 24:680–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tomikawa M, Akahoshi T, Sugimachi K, Ikeda Y, Yoshida K, Tanabe Y, Kawanaka H, Takenaka K, Hashizume M, Maehara Y (2010) Laparoscopic splenectomy may be a superior supportive intervention for cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tomikawa M, Hashizume M, Okita K, Kitano S, Ohta M, Higashi H, Akahoshi T (2002) Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in the management of 2,105 patients with esophageal varices. Surgery 31:S171–S175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morgan KA, Romagnuolo J, Adams DB (2008) Transduodenal sphincteroplasty in the management of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and pancreas divisum in the modern era. J Am Coll Surg 206:908–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tokunaga M, Ohyama S, Kuraoka K, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Tsuchida T, Fujisaki J, Yamamoto N, Yamaguchi T (2009) Twenty-two metachronous multiple signet-ring cell carcinomas treated with repeated gastrectomies and repeated endoscopic mucosal resections: report of a case. Surg Today 39:430–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Henderson JM, Heymsfield SB, Horowitz J, Kutner MH (1981) Measurement of liver and spleen volume by computed tomography. Assessment of reproducibility and changes found following a selective distal splenorenal shunt. Radiology 141:525–527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hashizume M, Tanoue K, Morita M, Ohta M, Tomikawa M, Sugimachi K (1998) Laparoscopic gastric devascularization and splenectomy for sclerotherapy-resistant esophagogastric varices with hypersplenism. J Am Coll Surg 187:263–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawanaka H, Akahoshi T, Kinjo N, Konishi K, Yoshida D, Anegawa G, Yamaguchi S, Uehara H, Hashimoto N, Tsutsumi N, Tomikawa M, Koushi K, Harada N, Ikeda Y, Korenaga D, Takenaka K, Maehara Y (2009) Technical standardization of laparoscopic splenectomy harmonized with hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for patients with liver cirrhosis and hypersplenism. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:749–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kakushima N, Fujishiro M (2008) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol 14:2962–2967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tomikawa M, Xu H, Hashizume M (2010) Current status and prerequisites for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Surg Today 40:909–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to Fuminaga Suetsugu, MD for his expert illustrations.

Disclosures

There are no potential conflicts of interest for any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morimasa Tomikawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomikawa, M., Akahoshi, T., Kinjo, N. et al. Rigid and flexible endoscopic rendezvous in spatium peritonealis may be an effective tactic for laparoscopic megasplenectomy: significant implications for pure natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 26, 3573–3579 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2369-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2369-2

Keywords

Navigation