Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can early laparoscopic cholecystectomy be the optimal management of cholecystitis with gallbladder perforation? A single institute experience of 74 cases

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gallbladder perforation is a rare but serious complication of cholecystitis. It was usually managed by percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) followed by elective cholecystectomy. However, evidences are emerging that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is still feasible under these conditions. We hypothesized that early LC may have comparable surgical results as to those of PTGBD + elective LC.

Material and methods

From January 2005 to October 2011, patients admitted to China Medical University Hospital with a diagnosis of perforated cholecystitis were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis of gallbladder perforation was made by image and/or intraoperative findings. Those patients who had unstable hemodynamics that were not fitted for general anesthesia or those who had concomitant major operations were excluded. Patients were divided into three groups: early open cholecystectomy (group 1), early LC (group 2), and PTGBD followed by elective LC (group 3). The demographic features, surgical results, and patient outcome were analyzed and compared between groups.

Results

A total of 74 patients were included. All patients had similar demographic features except that patients in group 2 were younger (62 vs. 72 and 73.5 years) compared with group 1 and group 3 (p = 0.016). There were no differences in terms of operative time, blood loss, conversion, and complication rate between three groups. The length of hospital stay (LOS) was significant shorter in group 2 patients compared with that of groups 1 and 3.

Conclusions

Although PTGBD followed by elective LC was still the mainstay for the treatment of gallbladder perforation, early LC had comparable surgical outcomes as that of PTGBD + LC but with a significantly shorter LOS. Early LC should be considered the optimal treatment for gallbladder perforation, and PTGBD + LC can be preserved for those who carried a high risk of operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang CC, Lo HC, Tzeng YM, Huang HH, Chen JD, Kao WF, Yen DHT, Huang CI, Lee CH (2007) Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage: a better initial therapeutic choice for patients with gall bladder perforation in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 24:836–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kochar K, Vallance K, Mathew G, Jadhav V (2008) Intrahepatic perforation of the gall bladder presenting as liver abscess: case report, review of literature and Niemeier’s classification. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20:240–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Larmi TK, Kairaluoma MI, Junila J, Laitinen S, Stahlberg M, Fock HG (1984) Perforation of the gallbladder. A retrospective comparative study of cases from 1946–1956 and 1969–1980. Acta Chir Scand 150:557–560

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Menakuru SR, Kaman L, Behera A, Singh R, Katariya RN (2004) Current management of gall bladder perforations. ANZ J Surg 74:843–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 97:141–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Melloul E, Denys A, Demartines N, Calmes JM, Schafer M (2011) Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter? World J Surg 35:826–833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis CA, Landercasper J, Gundersen LH, Lambert PJ (1999) Effective use of percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk surgical patients: techniques, tube management, and results. Arch Surg 134:727–731 discussion 731-722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Melin MM, Sarr MG, Bender CE, van Heerden JA (1995) Percutaneous cholecystostomy: a valuable technique in high-risk patients with presumed acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 82:1274–1277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Derici H, Kara C, Bozdag A-D, Nazli O, Tansug T, Akca E (2006) Diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder perforation. World J Gastroenterol 12:7832–7836

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stefanidis D, Sirinek KR, Bingener J (2006) Gallbladder perforation: risk factors and outcome. J Surg Res 131:204–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mocharla R, Shah HR (1997) Gallbladder perforation with contained empyema diagnosed by CT but missed by sonography and hepatobiliary scintigraphy. Am J Roentgenol 168:283–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fletcher AG Jr, Ravdin IS (1951) Perforation of the gallbladder. Am J Surg 81:178–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ido K, Isoda N, Kawamoto C, Suzuki T, Ioka T, Nagamine N, Taniguchi Y, Kumagai M, Kimura K (1996) Confirmation of a “safety zone” by intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 10:798–800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Legorreta AP, Silber JH, Costantino GN, Kobylinski RW, Zatz SL (1993) Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Med Assoc 270:1429–1432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Diffenbaugh WG, Sarver FE, Strohl EL (1949) Gangrenous perforation of the gallbladder; analysis of 19 cases. Arch Surg 59:742–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Isch JH, Finneran JC, Nahrwold DL (1971) Perforation of the gallbladder. Am J Gastroenterol 55:451–458

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roslyn J, Busuttil RW (1979) Perforation of the gallbladder: a frequently mismanaged condition. Am J Surg 137:307–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aronoff A, Johnson LG (1958) Gangrene and perforation of gall-bladder during cortisone therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Can Med Assoc J 79:268–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bedirli A, Sakrak O, Sozuer EM, Kerek M, Guler I (2001) Factors effecting the complications in the natural history of acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 48:1275–1278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roslyn JJ, Thompson JE Jr, Darvin H, DenBesten L (1987) Risk factors for gallbladder perforation. Am J Gastroenterol 82:636–640

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang A-J, Wang T-E, Lin C-C, Lin S-C, Shih S-C (2003) Clinical predictors of severe gallbladder complications in acute acalculous cholecystitis. World J Gastroenterol 9:2821–2823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson LB (1987) The importance of early diagnosis of acute acalculous cholecystitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 164:197–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Madrazo BL, Francis I, Hricak H, Sandler MA, Hudak S, Gitschlag K (1982) Sonographic findings in perforation of the gallbladder. Am J Roentgenol 139:491–496

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ong CL, Wong TH, Rauff A (1991) Acute gallbladder perforation—a dilemma in early diagnosis. Gut 32:956–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bennett GL, Balthazar EJ (2003) Ultrasound and CT evaluation of emergent gallbladder pathology. Radiol Clin N Am 41:1203–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Vargas MacciuccaM, Lanciotti S, De Cicco ML, Coniglio M, Gualdi GF (2006) Ultrasonographic and spiral CT evaluation of simple and complicated acute cholecystitis: diagnostic protocol assessment based on personal experience and review of the literature. Radiol Med 111:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim PN, Lee KS, Kim IY, Bae WK, Lee BH (1994) Gallbladder perforation: comparison of US findings with CT. Abdom Imaging 19:239–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pedrosa CS, Casanova R, Rodriguez R (1981) CT findings in subacute perforation of the gallbladder: report on 5 cases. Eur J Radiol 1:137–142

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Felice PR, Trowbridge PE, Ferrara JJ (1985) Evolving changes in the pathogenesis and treatment of the perforated gallbladder. A combined hospital study. Am J Surg 149:466–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Hung-Chieh Lo, Yu-Chun Wang, Li-Ting Su, and Chi-Hsun Hsieh have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, 2 Yuh-Der Road, Taichung, 404, Taiwan, ROC

    Hung-Chieh Lo, Yu-Chun Wang, Li-Ting Su & Chi-Hsun Hsieh

  2. School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Hung-Chieh Lo, Yu-Chun Wang & Chi-Hsun Hsieh

Authors
  1. Hung-Chieh Lo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu-Chun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li-Ting Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chi-Hsun Hsieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Hsun Hsieh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lo, HC., Wang, YC., Su, LT. et al. Can early laparoscopic cholecystectomy be the optimal management of cholecystitis with gallbladder perforation? A single institute experience of 74 cases. Surg Endosc 26, 3301–3306 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2344-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2344-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation