References
Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0
Blinman T (2010) Incisions do not simply sum. Surg Endosc 24:1746–1751
Garg P, Thakur JD, Singh I, Nain N, Garima, Gupta V (2012) A prospective controlled trial comparing single incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: caution before damage control. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech (accepted)
Asakuma M, Hayashi M, Komeda K, Shimizu T, Hirokawa F, Miyamoto Y, Okuda J, Tanigawa N (2011) Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain. Br J Surg 98:991–995
Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS, Chang JJ, Huang SJ, Lin MT, Lee PH (2010) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 97:1007–1012
Disclosures
Dr. Pankaj Garg, Ms. Serena Tharani, and Dr. Jai Deep Thakur have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garg, P., Tharani, S. & Thakur, J.D. Cosmetic outcome is an important parameter when comparing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Surg Endosc 26, 2998–2999 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2265-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2265-9