Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transoral stapling for Zenker diverticulum: effect of the traction suture-assisted technique on long-term outcomes

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Long-term outcomes and predictors of success after transoral stapling for Zenker diverticulum are still unclear.

Methods

Between 2001 and 2010, 91 patients with Zenker diverticulum underwent transoral stapling under general anesthesia. Since 2008, the technique was modified by applying traction sutures to ease engagement of the common septum inside the stapler jaws. Perioperative variables, distribution of symptoms, and outcome of surgery were analyzed. Long-term results were compared between patients undergoing standard versus modified technique of transoral stapling.

Results

The transoral approach was successfully completed in 79 (86.8 %) patients with a median age of 74 years. Overall morbidity was 5 %, and there was no mortality. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days. Six patients were lost to follow-up. After a median follow-up of 53 (range, 12–114) months, an improvement of dysphagia and regurgitation scores (p < 0.001) and a reduction in the number of pneumonia episodes per year (p < 0.001) was recorded. The long-term success rate of the procedure was 80.1 %. At a median time of 12 months, 14 patients complained of recurrent symptoms, 7 of whom needed an open (n = 4) or transoral (n = 3) reoperation. Use of traction sutures resulted in a greater long-term success compared with the standard procedure (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Transoral stapling is a safe and effective technique. A repeat procedure is feasible in case of recurrent diverticulum. The use of traction sutures applied at the apex of the common septum before stapling might increase the long-term success of the technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mosher H (1917) Webs and pouches of the esophagus, their diagnosis and management. Surg Gynecol Obstet 25:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nyrop M, Svendstrup F, Yorgensen KE (2000) Endoscopic CO2 laser therapy of Zenker’s diverticulum. Experience from 61 patients. Acta Otolaryngol 543:232–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lerut T, Van Raemdonck D, Guelinckx P, Dom R, Geboes K (1992) Zenker’s diverticulum: is a myotomy of the cricopharyngeus useful? How long should it be? Hepatogastroenterology 39:100–104

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collard JM, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1993) Endoscopic stapling technique of esophagodiverticulostomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. Ann Thorac Surg 56:573–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin-Hirsch D, Newbegin C (1993) Autosuture GIA gun: a new application in the treatment of hypopharyngeal diverticula. J Laringol Otol 107:723–725

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Narne S, Bonavina L, Guido E, Peracchia A (1993) Treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum by endoscopic stapling. Endosurgery 1:118–120

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aly A, Devitt PG, Jamieson GG (2004) Evolution of surgical treatment for pharyngeal pouch. Br J Surg 91:657–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sen P, Lowe DA, Farnan T (2005) Surgical interventions for pharyngeal pouch. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD004459

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonavina L, Bona D, Abraham M, Saino G, Abate E (2007) Long-term results of endosurgical and open surgical approach for Zenker’s diverticulum. World J Gastroenterol 13:2586–2589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peracchia A, Bonavina L, Narne S, Segalin A, Antoniazzi L, Marotta G (1998) Minimally invasive surgery for Zenker diverticulum: analysis of results in 95 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 133:695–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Panos MZ, Walt RP, Stevenson C, Langman MJS (1995) Rising death rate from non-malignant disease of oesophagus (NMOD) in England and Wales. Gut 36:488–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rizzetto C, Zaninotto G, Costantini M, Bottin R, Finotti E, Zanatta L, Guirroli E, Ceolin M, Nicoletti L, Ruol A, Ancona E (2008) Zenker’s diverticula: feasibility of a tailored approach based on diverticulum size. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2057–2065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Richtsmeier WJ (2005) Myotomy length determinants in endoscopic staple-assisted esophagodiverticulostomy for small Zenker’s diverticula. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:341–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicholas BD, Devitt S, Rosen D, Spiegel J, Boon M (2010) Endostitch-assisted endoscopic Zenker’s diverticulostomy: a tried approach for difficult cases. Dis Esophagus 23:296–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Bonavina, Rottoli, Bona, Siboni, Russo, and Bernardi have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Bonavina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonavina, L., Rottoli, M., Bona, D. et al. Transoral stapling for Zenker diverticulum: effect of the traction suture-assisted technique on long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 26, 2856–2861 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2261-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2261-0

Keywords

Navigation