Skip to main content
Log in

Transvaginal cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support using prototype flexible endoscopic instruments in a porcine model

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Transvaginal cholecystectomy with laparoscopic assistance has been performed safely in humans. The next goal was to develop a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) technique to perform cholecystectomy without laparoscopic instruments using one flexible endoscope and flexible accessories. The aim of the study was to test the feasibility of the procedure in a survival porcine model.

Methods

Cholecystectomies were attempted in five 88–130-lb. pigs with a planned 2-week survival. Prototype flexible instruments (NOTES Toolbox, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.) were used to aid in access, dissection, and removal of the gallbladder via the transvaginal route.

Results

Cholecystectomy could be completed without abdominal incision using prototype instruments in four out of five pigs. The cystic duct could be exposed with a flexible hook knife and clips applied. The steerable trocar improved stability and the precision of the dissection. The critical view was established in all five pigs. Dissection of the gallbladder off the liver bed was imprecise resulting in gallbladder perforation in all pigs and liver hemorrhage in two. At necropsy, all clips on the cystic duct were secure and no bile leak, bowel injury, or adhesions were present.

Conclusions

NOTES cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support is feasible but challenging using prototype flexible endoscopic devices. A prototype clip applier was effective in controlling the cystic duct. Further improvements in instrument design to ensure precision and safety are needed before flexible devices should be used for pure NOTES procedures in humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christian J, Barrier BF, Miedema B, Thaler K (2008) Culdoscopy: a foundation for natural orfice surgery—past, present and future. J Am Coll Surg 207(3):417–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Park P, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 61(4):601–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME, Odze RD, Rattner DW, Thompson CC (2006) Transcolonic endoscopic cholycystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 64:428–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Perretta S, Dallemaagne B, Coumaros D, Marescaux J (2008) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: transgastric cholecystectomy in a survival porcine model. Surg Endosc 22:1126–1130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanchez-Margallo F, Manuel Asencio J, Tejonero MC, Perez FJ, Sanchez MA, Uson J, Pascual S (2008) Technical feasibility of totally natural orfice cholecystectomy in a swine model. Minimy Invasive Ther 17(6):361–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sumiyama K, Gostout C, Rajan E, Bakken T, Knipschield M, Chung S, Cotton P, Hawes R, Kalloo A, Kantsevoy SV, Pasricha P (2007) Transgastric cholecystectomy: transgastric accessibility to the gallbladder improved with the SEMF method and a novel multibending therapeutic endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 65(7):1028–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, Bergs R, Goova MT, Zeltser I, Kehdy FJ, Cadeddu JA (2007) Completely transvaginal NOTES cholycystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc 21:2308–2316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rolanda C, Lima E, Pego J, Henriques-Coelho T, Silva D, Moreira I, Macedo G, Carvalho J, Correia-Pinto J (2007) Third-generation cholecystectomy by natural orifices: transgastric and transvesical combined approach (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 65(1):111–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simopoulos C, Kouklakis G, Zezos P, Ypsilantis P, Botaitis S, Tsalikidis C, Pitiakoudis M (2009) Peroral transgastric endoscopic procedures in pigs: feasibility, survival, questionings, and pitfalls. Surg Endosc 23(2):394–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feretis C, Kalantzopoulos D, Koulouris P, Kolettas C, Archontovasilis F, Chandakas S, Patsea H, Pantazopoulous A, Sideris M, Papalois A, Simopoulos K, Leandros E (2007) Endoscopic transgastric procedures in anesthetized pigs: technical challenges, complications, and survival. Endoscopy 39:394–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Salinas G, Saavedra L, Agurto H, Quispe R, Ramirez E, Grande J, Tamayo J, Sanchez V, Malaga D, Marks JM (2010) Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1092–1098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cardoso-Ramos A, Murakami M, Galvao-Neto M, Galvao S, Souza-Silva AC, Gonzalo-Canseco E, Moyes Y (2008) NOTES transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy: first series. Endoscopy 40:572–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars—report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142(9):823–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zornig C, Mofid H, Siemssen L, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels H-A, Felixmuller C (2009) Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with mid-term follow-up. Endoscopy 41:391–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Horgan S, Cullen JP, Talamini MA, Mintz Y, Ferreres A, Jacobsen GR, Sandler B, Bosia J, Savides T, Easter DW, Savu MK, Ramamoorthy SL, Whitcome E, Agarwal S, Lukacz E, Dominguez G, Ferraina P (2009) Natural orifice surgery: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 23:1512–1518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zorron R, Palanivelu C, Neto MPG, Ramos A, Salinas G, Burghardt J, DeCarli L, Sousa LH, Forgione A, Pugliese R, Branco AJ, Balashanmugan TS, Boza C, Corcione F, D’Avila-Avila F, Gomez NA, Ribeior PAG, Martins S, Filgueiras M, Gellert K, Branco AW, Kondo W, Sanseverino JI, de Sousa JAG, Saavedra L, Ramirez E, Campos J, Sivakumar K, Rajan PS, Jategaonkar PA, Ranagrajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Prasad M, Cuccurullo D, Muller V (2010) International multicenter trial on clinical natural orifice surgery—NOTES IMTN study: preliminary results of 361 patients. Surg Innov 17(2):142–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gumbs AA, Fowler D, Milone L, Evanko JC, Ude AO, Stevens P, Bessler M (2009) Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy—early evolution of the technique. Ann Surg 249(6):908–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang SH, Satgunum S, Miedema BW, Thaler K (2010) Transvaginal cholecystectomy by using a prototype flexible clip applier. Gastrointest Endosc 72:351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bessler M, Stevens PD, Milone L, Hogle NJ, Durak E, Fowler D (2007) Transvaginal laparoscopic cholycystectomy: laparoscopically assisted. Gastrointest Endosc 66(6):1243–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Iida Y, Miura S, Munemoto Y, Kasahara Y, Asada Y, Toya D, Fujisawa M (1994) Endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps using a clipping method. Dis Colon Rectum 37:179–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen DM, Machicado GA, Hirabayashi K (2005) Hemoclipping (CLIP) of chronic ulcers: a randomized prospective study of initial success, clip retention rates, and ulcer healing (abstract). Gastrointest Endosc 61:AB174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Machicado GA, Jensen DM, Hirabayashi K (2006) Randomized controlled study of 3 different types of hemoclips for hemostasis of bleeding canine acute gastric ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc 64:768–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the support of Ethicon Endo-Surgery for their support of this project.

Disclosures

Dr. Miedema and Dr. Thaler have received research funding from Satiety Inc., Boston Scientific Inc., Atrium Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc., Olympus America Inc., and Power Medical Inc. Dr. Satgunam and Dr. Wang have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brent Miedema.

Additional information

Disclaimers

The NOTES Toolbox devices used in this study are not yet approved by the FDA for use in humans. The Tissue Apposition System (TAS) is indicated for endoscopic placement of suture(s) and approximation of soft tissue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Satgunam, S., Miedema, B., Whang, S. et al. Transvaginal cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support using prototype flexible endoscopic instruments in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 26, 2331–2338 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2185-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2185-8

Keywords

Navigation