Skip to main content
Log in

Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with ultrasonography-guided transgastric access and over-the-scope-clip closure: a porcine feasibility and survival study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Most natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures to date rely on the hybrid technique with simultaneous laparoscopic access to protect against access-related complications and to achieve adequate triangulation for dissection. This is done at the cost of the potential benefits of this new minimally invasive technique. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a transgastric (TG) pure-NOTES procedure in a diagnostic setting.

Methods

A TG pure-NOTES procedure with endoscopic ultrasonograpy (EUS)-guided access and over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) closure was performed for 10 pigs in a survival and feasibility study. A full macroscopic necropsy with subsequent histologic evaluation was performed on postoperative day (POD) 14. The outcome parameters were uncomplicated follow-up assessment, survival, intraoperative complications, intraabdominal pathology, macroscopic full-thickness closure, and histology-proven full-thickness healing of the gastrotomy.

Results

An uncomplicated postoperative course was reported for 9 of the 10 pigs, and survival was reported for all 10 pigs. For all the pigs, EUS-guided access was performed successfully with a median duration of 25 min (range, 12–62 min) and without intraoperative complications or access-related lesions at necropsy. An OTSC closure was achieved with a median duration of 11 min (range, 3–28 min). The OTSC provided immediate closure, but according to the authors’ definition of a full-thickness healing evaluated by histologic examination, this was not achieved in any of the cases. Although all the animals survived until POD 14, intraabdominal chronic abscesses were present in 3 of the 10 pigs at necropsy.

Conclusions

The EUS-guided TG access proved to be feasible without access-related complications. Although OTSC provided an immediate closure, the histopathology raised concerns regarding the risk of perforation. Together with the high risk of intraabdominal infection, TG pure-NOTES is not yet ready for routine clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park PO (2006) Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 63:307–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boylu U, Oommen M, Joshi V, Thomas R, Lee BR (2010) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) partial nephrectomy in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 24:485–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crouzet S, Haber GP, Kamoi K, Berger A, Brethauer S, Gatmaitan P, Gill IS, Kaouk JH (2008) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) renal cryoablation in a porcine model. BJU Int 102:1715–1718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubcenco E, Grantcharov T, Streutker CJ, Jiang D, Baxter N, Baker JP (2011) Feasibility and safety of adhesiolysis using transgastric NOTES approach: a pilot survival study in a porcine model. Surg Innov 18:106–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Earle DB, Desilets DJ, Romanelli JR (2010) NOTES transgastric abdominal wall hernia repair in a porcine model. Hernia 14:517–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Ikeda K, Swain P (2006) Endoscopic transgastric lymphadenectomy by using EUS for selection and guidance. Gastrointest Endosc 63:302–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giday SA, Buscaglia JM, Althaus J, Donatelli G, Krishnamurty DM, Dray X, Ruben D, Liang D, Wroblewski R, Magno P, Shin EJ, Kalloo AN (2009) Successful diagnostic and therapeutic intrauterine fetal interventions by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 70:377–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA, Chung SS, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Scorpio DG, Magee CA, Pipitone LJ, Kalloo AN (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61:449–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Chung SS, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Magee CA, Vaughn CA, Barlow D, Shimonaka H, Kalloo AN (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:287–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Merrifield BF, Wagh MS, Thompson CC (2006) Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs. Gastrointest Endosc 63:693–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Onders RP, McGee MF, Marks J, Chak A, Rosen MJ, Ignagni A, Faulx A, Schomisch S, Ponsky J (2007) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) as a diagnostic tool in the intensive care unit. Surg Endosc 21:681–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park PO, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 61:601–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Romagnuolo J, Morris J, Palesch S, Hawes R, Lewin D, Morgan K (2010) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for inadvertent colon injury repair: feasibility, risk of abdominal adhesions, and peritoneal contamination in a porcine survival model. Gastrointest Endosc 71:817–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Simopoulos C, Kouklakis G, Zezos P, Ypsilantis P, Botaitis S, Tsalikidis C, Pitiakoudis M (2009) Peroral transgastric endoscopic procedures in pigs: feasibility, survival, questionings, and pitfalls. Surg Endosc 23:394–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Voermans RP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA, Fockens P (2011) Hybrid NOTES transgastric cholecystectomy with reliable gastric closure: an animal survival study. Surg Endosc 25:728–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2006) Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63:473–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Willingham FF, Gee DW, Sylla P, Kambadakone A, Singh AH, Sahani D, Mino-Kenudson M, Rattner DW, Brugge WR (2009) Natural orifice versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a porcine model: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 70:740–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Auyang ED, Hungness ES, Vaziri K, Martin JA, Soper NJ (2009) Human NOTES cholecystectomy: transgastric hybrid technique. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1149–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Allemann P, Donatelli G, Asakuma M, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2010) Transgastric cholecystectomy: from the laboratory to clinical implementation. World J Gastrointest Surg 2:187–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hazey JW, Narula VK, Renton DB, Reavis KM, Paul CM, Hinshaw KE, Muscarella P, Ellison EC, Melvin WS (2008) Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22:16–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A, Gellert K, Zornig C, Burghardt J, Busing M, Runkel N, Kohlhaw K, Albrecht R, Kirchner TG, Arlt G, Mall JW, Butters M, Bulian DR, Bretschneider J, Holmer C, Buhr HJ (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252:263–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nau P, Ellison EC, Muscarella P Jr, Mikami D, Narula VK, Needleman B, Melvin WS, Hazey JW (2010) A review of 130 humans enrolled in transgastric NOTES protocols at a single institution. Surg Endosc 25:1004–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nikfarjam M, McGee MF, Trunzo JA, Onders RP, Pearl JP, Poulose BK, Chak A, Ponsky JL, Marks JM (2010) Transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy in humans: a pilot study in efficacy and gastrotomy site selection by using a hybrid technique. Gastrointest Endosc 72:279–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Salinas G, Saavedra L, Agurto H, Quispe R, Ramirez E, Grande J, Tamayo J, Sanchez V, Malaga D, Marks JM (2010) Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1092–1098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sodergren MH, Clark J, Athanasiou T, Teare J, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2009) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: critical appraisal of applications in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 23:680–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zornig C, Mofid H, Siemssen L, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C (2009) Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with mid-term follow-up. Endoscopy 41:391–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zorron R, Palanivelu C, Galvao Neto MP, Ramos A, Salinas G, Burghardt J, DeCarli L, Henrique SL, Forgione A, Pugliese R, Branco AJ, Balashanmugan TS, Boza C, Corcione F, D’Avila AF, Arturo GN, Galvao Ribeiro PA, Martins S, Filgueiras M, Gellert K, Wood BA, Kondo W, Inacio SJ, de Sousa JA, Saavedra L, Ramirez E, Campos J, Sivakumar K, Rajan PS, Jategaonkar PA, Ranagrajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Prasad M, Cuccurullo D, Muller V (2010) International multicenter trial on clinical natural orifice surgery–NOTES IMTN study: preliminary results of 362 patients. Surg Innov 17:142–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rattner DW, Hawes R, Schwaitzberg S, Kochman M, Swanstrom L (2011) The Second SAGES/ASGE White Paper on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: 5 years of progress. Surg Endosc 25:2441–2448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (2006) White Paper October 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 63:199–203

  31. Elmunzer BJ, Schomisch SJ, Trunzo JA, Poulose BK, Delaney CP, McGee MF, Faulx AL, Marks JM, Ponsky JL, Chak A (2009) EUS in localizing safe alternate access sites for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: initial experience in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 69:108–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fritscher-Ravens A, Ghanbari A, Cuming T, Kahle E, Niemann H, Koehler P, Patel K (2008) Comparative study of NOTES alone vs EUS-guided NOTES procedures. Endoscopy 40:925–930

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Donatsky AM, Vilmann P, Meisner S, Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J (2011) Transgastric pure-NOTES peritoneoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of gastrointestinal cancers: a survival and feasibility study. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-2082-6

  34. Madsen L, Jensen H (2011) Necropsy of the pig. In: Jensen H (ed) Necropsy: a handbook and atlas. Fredriksberg, Biofolia, pp 83–106

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sohn DK, Turner BG, Gee DW, Willingham FF, Sylla P, Cizginer S, Konuk Y, Brugge WR, Rattner DW (2010) Reducing the unexpectedly high rate of injuries caused by NOTES gastrotomy creation. Surg Endosc 24:277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Elmunzer BJ, Chak A, Taylor JR, Trunzo JA, Piraka CR, Schomisch SJ, Rising GM, Elta GH, Scheiman JM, Ponsky JL, Marks JM, Kwon RS (2010) Hydroperitoneum-facilitated EUS-guided peritoneal entry and closure of alternate access sites for NOTES. Surg Innov 17:101–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Eloubeidi MA (2011) Initial evaluation of the forward-viewing echoendoscope prototype for performing fine-needle aspiration, Tru-cut biopsy, and celiac plexus neurolysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26:63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kirschniak A, Subotova N, Zieker D, Konigsrainer A, Kratt T (2011) The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding, perforations, and fistulas. Surg Endosc 25:2901–2905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Parodi A, Repici A, Pedroni A, Blanchi S, Conio M (2010) Endoscopic management of GI perforations with a new over-the-scope clip device (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 72:881–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Voermans RP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA, Fockens P (2009) Novel over-the-scope-clip system for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): an ex vivo comparison study. Endoscopy 41:1052–1055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Voermans RP, Vergouwe F, Breedveld P, Fockens P, van Berge Henegouwen MI (2011) Comparison of endoscopic closure modalities for standardized colonic perforations in a porcine colon model. Endoscopy 43:217–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. von Rudolph RD, Schmidt A, Vassiliou MC, Caca K (2010) Endoscopic closure of duodenal perforations by using an over-the-scope clip: a randomized, controlled porcine study. Gastrointest Endosc 71:131–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. von Renteln RD, Vassiliou MC, Rothstein RI (2009) Randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic clips and over-the-scope clips for closure of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomies. Endoscopy 41:1056–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nau P, Anderson J, Yuh B, Muscarella P Jr, Christopher EE, Happel L, Narula VK, Melvin WS, Hazey JW (2010) Diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy: extension of the initial human trial for staging of pancreatic head masses. Surg Endosc 24:1440–1446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sodergren MH, Coomber R, Clark J, Karimyan V, Athanasiou T, Teare J, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2010) What are the elements of safe gastrotomy closure in NOTES? A systematic review. Surg Innov 17:318–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dray X, Redding SK, Shin EJ, Buscaglia JM, Giday SA, Wroblewski RJ, Assumpcao L, Krishnamurty DM, Magno P, Pipitone LJ, Marohn MR, Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy SV (2009) Hydrogen leak test is minimally invasive and highly specific for assessment of the integrity of the luminal closure after natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery procedures (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 69:554–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jost BH, Post KW, Songer JG, Billington SJ (2002) Isolation of Arcanobacterium pyogenes from the porcine gastric mucosa. Vet Res Commun 26:419–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. O’Sullivan T, Friendship R, Blackwell T, Pearl D, McEwen B, Carman S, Slavic D, Dewey C (2011) Microbiological identification and analysis of swine tonsils collected from carcasses at slaughter. Can J Vet Res 75:106–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Huey RJ (1996) Incidence, location, and interrelationships between the sites of abscesses recorded in pigs at a bacon factory in Northern Ireland. Vet Rec 138:511–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Gahrn-Hansen B, Frederiksen W (1992) Human infections with Actinomyces pyogenes (Corynebacterium pyogenes). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 15:349–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Plamondon M, Martinez G, Raynal L, Touchette M, Valiquette L (2007) A fatal case of Arcanobacterium pyogenes endocarditis in a man with no identified animal contact: case report and review of the literature. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 26:663–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Weber DJ, Wolfson JS, Swartz MN, Hooper DC (1984) Pasteurella multocida infections: report of 34 cases and review of the literature. Medicine 63:133–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Buck L, Michalek J, Van SK, Schwesinger W, Bingener J (2008) Can gastric irrigation prevent infection during NOTES mesh placement? J Gastrointest Surg 12:2010–2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Eickhoff A, Vetter S, von Renteln RD, Caca K, Kahler G, Eickhoff JC, Jakobs R, Riemann JF (2010) Effectivity of current sterility methods for transgastric NOTES procedures: results of a randomized porcine study. Endoscopy 42:748–752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Giday SA, Dray X, Magno P, Buscaglia JM, Shin EJ, Surti VC, Assumpcao L, Marohn MR, Ruben D, Zhigalin A, Pipitone LJ, Kantsevoy SV (2010) Infection during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a randomized, controlled study in a live porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 71:812–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Narula VK, Hazey JW, Renton DB, Reavis KM, Paul CM, Hinshaw KE, Needleman BJ, Mikami DJ, Ellison EC, Melvin WS (2008) Transgastric instrumentation and bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity. Surg Endosc 22:605–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yang QY, Zhang GY, Wang L, Wang ZG, Li F, Li YQ, Ding XJ, Hu SY (2011) Infection during transgastric and transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in a live porcine model. Chin Med J 124:556–561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fritscher-Ravens A, Arlt A (2011) Safety notes: how to avoid infections in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Endoscopy 43:58–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ramamoorthy SL, Lee JK, Luo L, Mintz Y, Cullen J, Easter DW, Savu MK, Chock A, Carethers J, Horgan S, Talamini MA (2010) The inflammatory response in transgastric surgery: gastric content leak leads to localized inflammatory response and higher adhesive disease. Surg Endosc 24:531–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Arezzo A, Kratt T, Schurr MO, Morino M (2009) Laparoscopic-assisted transgastric cholecystectomy and secure endoscopic closure of the transgastric defect in a survival porcine model. Endoscopy 41:767–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Mathews JC, Chin MS, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Shaikh SN, Pietramaggiori G, Scherer SS, Ryan MB, Ferrigno M, Orgill DP, Thompson CC (2010) Early healing of transcolonic and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery access sites. J Am Coll Surg 210:480–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Olympus Corporation for supplying the endoscopic hardware necessary for this study. They also thank the EURO-NOTES Foundation, Toyota Foundation, Axel Muusfeldt Foundation, University of Copenhagen, the Research Council at Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and the Capital Region of Denmark, and the Foundation for Health Research for financial support.

Disclosures

Barbara Juliane Holzknecht has received funds for travel from Pfizer and Merck Sharp & Dohme. Peter Vilmann has received a consultanship honorarium from MediGlobe GmbH, Grassau, Germany, and reimbursed travel from Olympus, Denmark. Søren Meisner is a consultant with Boston Scientific, Olympus Europa, and Coloplast Denmark. Lars Nannestad Jørgensen has received a travel grant from Olympus and lecture fees from Covidien. Jacob Rosenberg has received payment for expert testimony from Baxter Healthcare and research support from Covidien and Baxter Healthcare, and has had travel/accommodation expenses for international meetings covered by Johnson & Johnson. Anders Meller Donatsky, Luise Andersen, and Ole Lerberg Nielsen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Meller Donatsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donatsky, A.M., Andersen, L., Nielsen, O.L. et al. Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with ultrasonography-guided transgastric access and over-the-scope-clip closure: a porcine feasibility and survival study. Surg Endosc 26, 1952–1962 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2135-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2135-x

Keywords

Navigation