Abstract
Background
There is growing concern that the recently introduced National Training Programme for consultants in laparoscopic colorectal surgery will have a negative impact on the training of senior colorectal trainees by minimizing the opportunities available. This study aimed to determine the impact that local implementation of the National Training Programme has had on the operating experience of senior colorectal trainees.
Methods
A prospective study was conducted at a designated national training center for laparoscopic colorectal surgery based in a large district general hospital in England, United Kingdom. All patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery in our unit between October 2006–September 2008 and October 2008–September 2010 were included in the study. The study variables included number and type of procedure, patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, body mass index, conversion rates, previous abdominal surgery, and median operating time. The main outcome measure was the number of procedures performed by senior colorectal trainees before and after commencement of National Training Programme training in October 2008.
Results
A total of 746 laparoscopic colorectal resections were performed. Senior colorectal trainees performed 175 cases before commencement of the National Training Programme and 184 cases afterward. The difference was not significant. National Training Programme consultants performed 126 cases. Data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and the Mann–Whitney U test. The study groups were found to be well matched. The median operating time was significantly longer after commencement of the National Training Programme. The study was limited in terms of ability to extrapolate results to smaller units wishing to participate in training programs.
Conclusion
Implementation of the National Training Programme in our hospital has not had a negative impact on the training opportunities for senior colorectal trainees. However, any unit wishing to participate in the National Training Programme must ensure that an adequate operative caseload and extra resources for operative lists are available for training.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726
Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229
Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stephens JH, Stevenson AR (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059
http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/TA105guidance.pdf. Accessed 6 Feb 2011
http://www.lapco.nhs.uk. Accessed 1 Nov 2011
Hemandas A, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG, Skull AJ, Senapati A, O’Leary DP, Parvaiz A (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high-risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg 252:84–89
Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641
Harinath G, Shah PR, Haray PN, Foster ME (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland: Where are we now? Colorectal Dis 7:86–89
Simons AJ, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Franklin M, Fleshman J, Geis WP, Beart RW Jr (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve. Dis Colon Rectum 38:600–603
Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222
Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Adams J, Beart RW Jr (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1,194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132:41–44
Dinçler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1378
Hemandas A, Flashman KG, Farrow J, O’Leary DP, Parvaiz A (2011) Modular training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery maximizes training opportunities without clinical compromise. World J Surg 35:409–414
Lund L, Dubrowski A, Carnahan H (2007) A modular approach for training urologists in laparoscopy. BJU Int 100:1216–1218
Acknowledgments
The National Training Programme is funded by the Department of Health, UK. Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, was one of the 10 centers designated for training.
Disclosures
Anil K. Hemandas, Shady Zeidan, Karen G. Flashman, Jim S. Khan, and Amjad Parvaiz have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hemandas, A.K., Zeidan, S., Flashman, K.G. et al. Impact of the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery on training opportunities for senior colorectal trainees. Surg Endosc 26, 1939–1945 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2131-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2131-1