Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection: does single-port surgery offer the same possibilities as conventional laparoscopy?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of single-port surgery (SPS) for laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection.

Methods

From December 2010 to April 2011, all patients referred for aortic lymph node staging underwent a laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach with a single-port device. The extraperitoneal approach was performed using only one 3–4 cm incision on the left side. Gelpoint from Applied Medical (Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA), a 10-mm 0° laparoscope, and 5-mm standard instruments were used.

Results

The study enrolled 13 patients. Aortic dissection was complete for 11 patients and incomplete for 2 patients. The mean lymph node count was 16 (range, 7–40). The mean blood loss was 40.7 ml (range, 0–100 ml), and no transfusion was necessary. The mean hospital stay was 1.7 days (range, 1–4 days) for this series.

Conclusion

The study results demonstrate the feasibility of single-port-access laparoscopy for extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy. The lymph node count was similar to that described in the published experience of conventional laparoscopic extraperitoneal dissection. This preliminary report shows that SPS is usable for extraperitoneal aortic dissection and that it is possible to perform this procedure using only one skin incision compared with the three or four incisions required for conventional laparoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eltabbakh GH, Shamonki MI, Moody JM et al (2001) Laparoscopy as the primary modality for the treatment of women with endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 91:378–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Malur S, Possover M, Michels W et al (2001) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 80:239–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scribner DR Jr, Walker JL, Johnson GA et al (2002) Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection in the obese. Gynecol Oncol 84:426–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holub Z, Jabor A, Bartos P et al (2002) Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: results of a multicenter study. JSLS 6:125–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zullo F, Palomba S, Russo T et al (2005) A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer: a focus on the quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1344–1352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuoppala T, Tomas E, Heinonen PK (2004) Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 270:25–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong CK, Wong YH, Lo LS et al (2005) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 31:286–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zapico A, Fuentes P, Grassa A et al (2005) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stages I and II endometrial cancer: operating data, follow up and survival. Gynecol Oncol 98:222–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cicinelli E, Fiaccavento A, Zaccoletti R, Barbieri F, Tinelli A, Perone C, Cosentino F (2009) Is early stage endometrial cancer safely treated by laparoscopy? Complications of a multicenter study and review of recent literature. Surg Oncol 20(2):80–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kohler C, Klemm P, Schau A, Possover M, Krause N, Tozzi R, Schneider A (2004) Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynaecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies. Gynecol Oncol 95:52–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chow A, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P (2009) Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): the first UK experience. Surg Innov 16:211–217 Epub 31 August 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH (2009) Early experience with single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using the SILS Port. Int J Surg 7(5):456–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barbaros U, Dinççağ A (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy: the first two cases. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1520–1523 Epub 14 April 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cugat Andorrá E, García-Domingo MI, Fonollosa EH, Rivero Déniz J, Molina CM (2009) Cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). Cir Esp 85:315–317 Epub 1 April 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2009) Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for benign disease. Colorectal Dis 12(1):61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginestà C, Benarroch G, García-Valdecasas JC (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILS): initial experience. Cir Esp 85:317–319 Epub 14 March 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Filipovic-Cugura J, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Bekavac-Beslin M (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: first case. Surg Endosc 23:920–921 Epub 17 January 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ciancio F, Cannone F (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 22(2):65–70

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J, Lee SH, Kwon HY, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim JH, Kim YT, Kim SW (2010) Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:26.e1–26.e6 Epub 24 April 2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Escobar PF, Fader AN, Rasool N, Espalliat LR (2010) Single-port laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling or lymphadenectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:1268–1273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hahn HY, Kim YW (2010) Single-port laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection with modified radical vaginal hysterectomy in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:1429–1432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Querleu D, Dargent Y, Ansquer E, Leblanc F Narducci (2000) Extraperitoneal endosurgical aortic and common iliac dissection in the staging of bulky or advanced cervical carcinomas. Cancer 88(8):1883–1891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fader AN, Escobar PF (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) in gynaecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol 114:157–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Eric Lambaudie, Francesco Cannone, Marie Bannier, Max Buttarelli, and Gilles Houvenaeghel have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Lambaudie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambaudie, E., Cannone, F., Bannier, M. et al. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection: does single-port surgery offer the same possibilities as conventional laparoscopy?. Surg Endosc 26, 1920–1923 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2126-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2126-y

Keywords

Navigation