Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 1751–1758

A comparative study of endoscopic full-thickness and partial-thickness myotomy using submucosal endoscopy with mucosal safety flap (SEMF) technique

  • Eduardo A. Bonin
  • Erica Moran
  • Juliane Bingener
  • Mary Knipschield
  • Christopher J. Gostout



Esophageal myotomy using submucosal endoscopy with mucosal safety flap (SEMF) has been proposed as a new treatment of achalasia. In this technique, a partial-thickness myotomy (PTM) preserving the longitudinal outer esophageal muscular layer is advocated, which is different from the usual full-thickness myotomy (FTM) performed surgically. The aim of this study was to compare endoscopic FTM and PTM and analyze the outcomes of each method after a 4 week survival period.


Twenty-four pigs were randomly assigned into group A (FTM, 12 animals) and group B (PTM) to undergo endoscopic myotomy. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was assessed using pull-through manometry. For statistical analysis we compared the average esophageal sphincter pressure values at baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks between groups A and B. The P value was set as <0.05 for significance.


Eighteen animals were included for statistical analysis. Mean (SD) LES pressures were similar between groups A and B (nine animals each) at baseline [group A = 23 (10.4) mmHg; group B = 20.7 (8.7) mmHg; P = 0.79], after 2 weeks [group A = 19 (7.7) mmHg; group B = 21.8 (8.4) mmHg; P = 0.79], and after 4 weeks [group A = 22.6 (10.2) mmHg; group B = 20.7 (9) mmHg; P = 0.82]. LES pressures were significantly reduced in three animals after 4 weeks: one animal (1%) in group A and two animals (2.5%) in group B. An extended myotomy (3 cm below the cardia) was achieved in three animals and was responsible for the significant drop in LES pressure seen in the two animals from group B.


Esophageal myotomy using SEMF is a feasible yet challenging procedure in pigs. Full-thickness myotomy does not seem to be superior to partial-thickness myotomy as demonstrated by pull-through manometry. Endoscopic esophageal myotomy results are greatly influenced by obtaining adequate myotomy extension into the gastric cardia.


Achalasia Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Esophageal Digestive Myotomy 


  1. 1.
    Campos GM, Vittinghoff E, Rabl C, Takata M, Gadenstätter M, Lin F, Ciovica R (2009) Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 249(1):45–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang L, Li YM, Li L (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized and controlled treatment trials for achalasia. Dig Dis Sci 54(11):2303–2311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bello B, Herbella FA, Patti MG (2011) Evolution of the minimally invasive treatment of esophageal achalasia. World J Surg 35(7):1442–1446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wright AS, Williams CW, Pellegrini CA, Oelschlager BK (2007) Long-term outcomes confirm the superior efficacy of extended Heller myotomy with Toupet fundoplication for achalasia. Surg Endosc 21:713–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burpee SE, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, Bendavid Y, Klein L, Moloo H, Poulin EC (2005) Objective analysis of gastroesophageal reflux after laparoscopic Heller myotomy: an anti-reflux procedure is required. Surg Endosc 19(1):9–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Knipschield MA, Marler RJ (2007) Submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap safety valve. Gastrointest Endosc 65(4):688–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I, Chen J, Cotton PB, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy SV, Gostout CJ (2007) Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy 39(9):761–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42(4):265–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stavropoulos SN, Harris MD, Hida S, Brathwaite C, Demetriou C, Grendell J (2010) Endoscopic submucosal myotomy for the treatment of achalasia (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72(6):1309–1311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inoue H, Ikeda H, Kobayashi Y, Minami H, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S (2011) Clinical results of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for 56 consecutive cases of esophageal achalasia. Presented at the 2011 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) meeting, San Antonio, TX, 30 March–2 April 2011. Surg Endosc 25(Suppl 1):S034Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iqbal A, Tierney B, Haider M, Salinas VK, Karu A, Turaga KK, Mittal SK, Filipi CJ (2006) Laparoscopic re-operation for failed Heller myotomy. Dis Esophagus 19(3):193–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oelschlager BK, Chang L, Pellegrini CA (2003) Improved outcome after extended gastric myotomy for achalasia. Arch Surg 138(5):490–495 discussion 495–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Allemann P, Marescaux J (2010) Heller myotomy and intraluminal fundoplication: a NOTES technique. Surg Endosc 24(11):2903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo A. Bonin
    • 1
  • Erica Moran
    • 2
  • Juliane Bingener
    • 2
  • Mary Knipschield
    • 1
  • Christopher J. Gostout
    • 1
  1. 1.Developmental Endoscopy UnitMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations