Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic management of gastric band erosions: a 10-year series of 49 cases

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intragastric erosion is a rare but major complication of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) surgery for morbid obesity. Many techniques to treat this problem have been described, with little supporting evidence. The authors review their experience with laparoscopic removal of eroded gastric bands.

Methods

The prospectively collected bariatric surgery database of the authors’ practice was queried for the period January 2000 until February 2011, and the medical records for all patients with the diagnosis of band erosion were reviewed. Symptoms, time to erosion, interval between diagnosis and treatment, and complications of treatment were reviewed. All patients had undergone laparoscopy, cut-down onto the band, unclasping or division of the band near the buckle, removal of the band, and primary closure of the gastrotomy with omental patch reinforcement.

Results

During the study period, 2,097 LAGB operations were performed and 53 (2.53%) of these resulted in intragastric erosion. All the bands placed were LapBands (Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA). Erosions occurred with 14 of the 10-cm bands, 11 of the Vanguard bands, 14 of the AP Small bands, and 14 of the AP Large bands. Three patients elected to have their revisional surgery elsewhere and thus were lost to follow-up evaluation. One patient declined to have her band removed. The remaining 49 patients were included in the analysis. The mean time from band placement to the diagnosis of erosion was 31.5 months, and the mean time from diagnosis to band removal was 32 days. The mean hospital stay was 4 days. The complications included one postoperative leak, four superficial wound infections, and one pleural effusion. There were no deaths.

Conclusions

This review demonstrates the safety of laparoscopic removal of eroded gastric bands with primary closure and omental patch repair. The time from diagnosis of erosion to treatment can be short, in contrast to endoscopic removal, in which the requirement for further erosion of the band to free the buckle often necessitates delayed treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kohn GP, Galanko JA, Overby DW, Farrell TM (2009) Recent trends in bariatric surgery case volume in the United States. Surgery 146:375–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Medicare Australia (2011) Medicare Australia statistics. Australian Government. http://www.budget.gov.au/. Accessed on 1 April 2011

  3. Niville E, Dams A, Vlasselaers J (2001) Lap-Band erosion: incidence and treatment. Obes Surg 11:744–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meir E, Van Baden M (1999) Adjustable silicone gastric banding and band erosion: personal experience and hypotheses. Obes Surg 9:191–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lattuada E, Zappa MA, Mozzi E, Fichera G, Granelli P, De Ruberto F, Antonini I, Radaelli S, Roviaro G (2007) Band erosion following gastric banding: how to treat it. Obes Surg 17:329–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cherian PT, Goussous G, Ashori F, Sigurdsson A (2010) Band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a retrospective analysis of 865 patients over 5 years. Surg Endosc 24:2031–2038

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Basa NR, Dutson E, Lewis C, Derezin M, Han S, Mehran A (2008) Laparoscopic transgastric removal of eroded adjustable band: a novel approach. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:194–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neto MP, Ramos AC, Campos JM, Murakami AH, Falcao M, Moura EH, Evangelista LF, Escalona A, Zundel N (2010) Endoscopic removal of eroded adjustable gastric band: lessons learned after 5 years and 78 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:423–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blero D, Eisendrath P, Vandermeeren A, Closset J, Mehdi A, Le OM, Deviere J (2010) Endoscopic removal of dysfunctioning bands or rings after restrictive bariatric procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 71:468–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurian M, Sultan S, Garg K, Youn H, Fielding G, Ren-Fielding C (2010) Evaluating gastric erosion in band management: an algorithm for stratification of risk. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:386–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Silecchia G, Restuccia A, Elmore U, Polito D, Perrotta N, Genco A, Bacci V, Basso N (2001) Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding: prospective evaluation of intragastric migration of the lap-band. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:229–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Westling A, Bjurling K, Ohrvall M, Gustavsson S (1998) Silicone-adjustable gastric banding: disappointing results. Obes Surg 8:467–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixon JB, O’Brien PE (2005) Permeability of the silicone membrane in laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands has important clinical implications. Obes Surg 15:624–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abu-Abeid S, Szold A (2001) Laparoscopic management of Lap-Band erosion. Obes Surg 11:87–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Geoffrey Paul Kohn, Cheryl Anne Hansen, Richard William Gilhome, Ray Charles McHenry, Dean Constantine Spilias, and Chris Hensman have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Paul Kohn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohn, G.P., Hansen, C.A., Gilhome, R.W. et al. Laparoscopic management of gastric band erosions: a 10-year series of 49 cases. Surg Endosc 26, 541–545 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1916-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1916-6

Keywords

Navigation