Skip to main content
Log in

Does adding a lesser-curvature gastrogastric plication suture reduce the need for revision after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The need for revision after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) surgery has been reduced over the past 10 years with the introduction of the pars flaccida technique, delicate band tightening, and concurrent hiatal hernia repairs. However, band revision still occurs for as many as 5% of patients. Placement of a lesser-curvature gastrogastric suture distal to the band is one newer technique suggested to lower band slippage. To evaluate the worth of this technique, the authors have investigated two groups of patients in their practice: one group with the plication stitch and one group without it.

Methods

This retrospective review examined data for 1,365 LAGB patients collected prospectively by an institutional review board-approved database between July 2007 and May 2010. One surgeon did not perform the plication stitch (n = 776) and one did (n = 589). The surgical techniques were very similar. The majority of the patients had crural repair at the primary operation. Band revision rates were assessed.

Results

For 1,365 patients, LAGB was performed safely. The mean follow-up period was 22 months. The two groups were similar. The no-stitch group consisted of 776 patients (496 women, 64%) with a mean age of 42 years, a mean weight of 278 lb, and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 44.6 kg/m2. The stitch group consisted of 589 patients (426 woman, 72%) with a mean age of 40 years, a mean weight of 278 lb, and a mean BMI of 44.8 kg/m2. The no-stitch group had an estimated weight loss (EWL) of 44% at 12 months and 50% EWL at 2 years. The stitch group had 37% EWL at 12 months and 45% EWL at 2 years. Both groups had very low revision rates. The no-stitch group had 4 revisions in 776 patients (0.26%), and the stitch group had 9 revisions in 589 patients (1.5%).

Conclusion

Adding gastrogastric plication sutures offers no benefit of reducing the rate of revision after LAGB surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belachew M, Belva PH, Desaive C (2002) Long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg 12:564–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zinzindohoue F, Chevallier J, Douard R, Elian N, Ferraz J, Blance J, Berta J, Altman J, Safran D, Cugnnc P (2002) Laprascopic gastric banding: a minimally invasive surgical treatment for morbid obesity: a prospective study of 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 237:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spivak H, Hewitt MF, Onn A, Half EE (2005) Weight loss and improvement of obesity-related illness in 500 U.S. patients following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedure. Am J Surg 189:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen JW (2007) Laparoscopic gastric band complications. Med Clin North Am 91:485–497 xii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ren CJ, Fielding GA (2003) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: surgical technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13:257–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB (2003) Pars flaccida versus perigastric pathways for the placement of the lap-band system. Obes Surg 13:211

    Google Scholar 

  7. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C, Anderson M (2005) A prospective randomized trial of placement of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: comparison of the perigastric and pars flaccida pathways. Obes Surg 15:820–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fielding GA, Duncombe JE (2005) Clinical and radiological follow-up of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: a comparison of two techniques. Obes Surg 15:634–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ponce J, Paynter S, Fromm R (2005) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: 1,014 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 201:529–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Egan RJ, Monkhouse SJ, Meredith HE, Bates SE, Morgan JD, Norton SA (2011) The reporting of gastric band slip and related complications: a review of the literature. Obes Surg 21:1280–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parikh MS, Fielding GA, Ren CJ (2005) U.S. experience with 749 laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: intermediate outcomes. Surg Endosc 19:1631–1635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gulkarov I, Wetterau M, Ren C, Fielding G (2008) Hiatal hernia repair at the initial laparoscopic adjustable gastric band reduces the need for reoperation. Surg Endosc 22:1035–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brethauer SA, Harris JL, Kroh M, Schauer PR (2011) Laparoscopic gastric plication for treatment of severe obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Marina S. Kurian has received an honorarium and a grant from Allergan Medical. Christine Ren Fielding has received an honorarium and a grant from Allergan Medical. She has served as a consultant for the Surgical Review Committee and ExploraMed. George A. Fielding has received an honorarium and a grant from Allergan Medical and an honoraium from Ethicon Endosurgery. Jonathan Zagzag, Bradley F. Schwack, Heekoung Youn have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley F. Schwack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zagzag, J., Schwack, B.F., Youn, H. et al. Does adding a lesser-curvature gastrogastric plication suture reduce the need for revision after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement?. Surg Endosc 26, 514–517 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1910-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1910-z

Keywords

Navigation