Abstract
Background
Indications for minimally invasive major hepatectomies have been increasing as experience with these techniques grows. Invasion into the diaphragm is considered a contraindication to the laparoscopic approach. At their institution, the authors have begun approaching all tumors laparoscopically. This report presents the techniques necessary to perform right hepatectomy, partial diaphragm resection, and repair using totally laparoscopic techniques.
Methods
Five trocars are placed in a semilunar fashion approximately one handbreadth apart along a line one handbreadth below the right subcostal margin. The hepatic inflow is taken extraparenchymally before transection of the hepatic parenchyma in an anterior-to-posterior fashion. The hepatic inflow then is transected, and the involved portion of diaphragm is transected with ultrasonic shears. Next, the diaphragm is repaired primarily and buttressed with an absorbable material to decrease the incidence of recurrent diaphragmatic hernia.
Results
Laparoscopic treatment was attempted for ten patients and successfully completed for nine of these patients (90%). All 10 patients had secondary liver tumors. Three patients required concomitant partial diaphragm resection. The median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 500 ml (range, 300–3,000 ml). All margins were negative, and the average hospital stay was 8 days (range, 5–17 days). Two patients (20%) experienced complications, which consisted of biliary leaks, which were treated with percutaneous drainage. One of these patients underwent conversion to an open procedure due to an inferior vena cava injury. No mortality occurred at 30 or 90 days of follow-up evaluation.
Conclusion
The minimally invasive approach to secondary tumors requiring right hepatectomy is feasible and safe even when there is diaphragmatic involvement. Larger series with long-term follow-up evaluation are needed to determine whether these short-term results translate into durable benefits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2008) Multimedia article: totally laparoscopic extended right hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 22:2076–2077
Nishioka K, Mitsudomi T, Saitoh G, Maruyama R, Ishida T, Takenaka K, Sugimachi K (1996) Combined resections of the diaphragm and the liver for a locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Respiration 63:314–317
Favero A, Benzoni E, Zompicchiatti A, Rossit L, Bresadola F, De Anna D, Uzzau A (2007) Surgery in hepatic and extrahepatic colorectal metastases. G Chir 28:307–311
Lin MC, Wu CC, Chen JT, Lin CC, Liu TJ (2005) Surgical results of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with gross diaphragmatic invasion. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1497–1501
Scudamore CH, Shackleton CR, Fache JS, Forward AD, Erb SR (1990) Diaphragmatic resection in association with right hepatectomy. Can J Surg 33:21–24
Lubezky N, Sagie B, Keidar A, Szold A (2007) Prosthetic mesh repair of large and recurrent diaphragmatic hernias. Surg Endosc 21:737–741
Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Jategaonkar PA, Parthasarathi R, Balu K (2008) Laparoscopic repair of parahiatal hernias with mesh: a retrospective study. Hernia 12:521–525
Gumbs AA, Gayet B, Gagner M (2008) Laparoscopic liver resection: when to use the laparoscopic stapler device. HPB Oxford 10:296–303
Gumbs AA, Crovari F, Vidal C, Henri P, Gayet B (2007) Modified robotic lightweight endoscope (ViKY) validation in vivo in a porcine model. Surg Innov 14:261–264
Disclosures
Andrew A. Gumbs is a consultant for Ethicon Biosurgery and a lecturer for Applied Medical. Abraham Leventhal and John P. Hoffman have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclosure.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 242759 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gumbs, A.A., Leventhal, A. & Hoffman, J.P. Laparoscopic right hepatectomy and partial resection of the diaphragm for liver metastases. Surg Endosc 25, 3441–3443 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1712-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1712-3