Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Late accidental dislodgement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube: an underestimated burden on patients and the health care system

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Since its introduction in 1980, the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube has become an efficient means of providing long-term enteral access. Conveniently, the soft inner bumper allows PEG removal with relatively minimal external traction. Consequently, a major complication is accidental dislodgement, from which significant morbidity may occur. Clinicians have perhaps underestimated and underappreciated this complication, not only in the acute setting but over the lifetime of the PEG tube.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of PEG placements conducted at the authors’ institution identified all PEG tubes placed between July 1, 2007 and July 1, 2010 by one faculty surgeon. Patient charts were reviewed for 30-day mortality, complications, and subsequent management. Patients were reviewed until intentional removal of the PEG, cessation of records, or patient mortality.

Results

A total of 563 PEGs were identified. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.8% (44/563), and the 7-day early accidental dislodgement rate was 4.1% (23/563). The total lifetime accidental PEG dislodgement rate was 12.8% (72/563). Of the 72 dislodged PEGs, 49 occurred after discharge from rehabilitation or nursing facilities. The vast majority required an emergency department visit, a level 3 surgical consultation, a replacement gastrostomy tube, and a radiographic confirmation of tube positioning, resulting in charges totaling an average of $1,200.

Conclusion

Many large PEG reviews report an early accidental dislodgement rate of 0.6% to 4.0%. The most clinically significant accidental removals occur in the first 7 days after placement, and open gastrostomy may cause obvious morbidity. The early dislodgement rate in this study (4.1%) is consistent with those currently reported. However, if cases are followed longitudinally, a significantly higher rate of late dislodgement (12.8%) is seen. Frequently placed into neurologically impaired or elderly patients, the PEGs that dislodge months and years later require expensive management. The late removal complication and its associated costs are overlooked and underestimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gauderer MWL, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr (1980) Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 15:872–875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gauderer MWL (2001) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-20 years later: a historical perspective. J Pediatr Surg 36:217–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schapiro GD, Edmundowicz SA (1996) Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 6:409–422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall JB, Bodnarchuk G, Barthel JS (1994) Early accidental dislodgement of PEG tubes. J Clin Gastroenterol 18:210–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maclean AA, Miller G, Bamboat ZM, Hiotis K (2004) Abdominal wall necrotizing fasciitis from dislodged percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: a case series. Am Surg 70:827–831

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sridhar AV, Nichani S, Luyt D, Nour S (2006) Candida peritonitis: a rare complication following early dislodgement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube. J Paediatr Child Health 42:145–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan YM, Abdullah M, Goh KL (2001) Hemoperitoneum after accidental dislodgement and subsequent replacement of PEG tube. Gastrointest Endosc 53:671–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Santos PM, McDonald J (1999) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: avoiding complications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:195–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lockett MA, Templeton ML, Byrne TK, Norcross ED (2002) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complications in a tertiary care center. Am Surg 68:117–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin HS, Ibrahim HZ, Kheng BS, Fee WE, Terris DJ (2001) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: strategies for prevention and management of complications. Laryngoscope 111:1847–1852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schurink CAM, Tuynman H, Scholten P, Arjaans W, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Meuwissen SGM, Kuipers EJ (2001) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: complications and suggestions to avoid them. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:819–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ponsky JL, Gauderer MWL, Stellato TA (1983) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: review of 150 cases. Arch Surg 118:913–914

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chandu A, Smith ACH, Douglas M (2003) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients undergoing resection for oral tumors: a retrospective review of complications and outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:1279–1284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cass OW, Rowland K, Bartram B, Ross JR, Choe Y, Hall JD (1999) Insertion, efficacy, and removal of a nonendoscopically removable percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Surg Endosc 13:516–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dwyer KM, Watts DD, Thurber JS, Benoit RS, Fakhry SM (2002) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: the preferred method of elective feeding tube placement in trauma patients. J Trauma 52:26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ljungdahl M, Sundbom M (2006) Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 20:1248–1251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chowdhury MA, Batey R (1996) Complications and outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in different patient groups. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:835–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Terry NE, Boswell WC, Carney DE, Beck A, Lowe L, Rittmeyer C (2008) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with T-bar fixation in children and infants. Surg Endosc 22:167–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Duh QY, Way LW (1993) Laparoscopic gastrostomy using T-fasteners as retractors and anchors. Surg Endosc 7:60–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ho T, Margulies D (1999) Pneumoperitoneum from an eroded T-fastener. Surg Endosc 13:285–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Laura H. Rosenberger, Timothy Newhook, Bruce Schirmer, and Robert G. Sawyer have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura H. Rosenberger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenberger, L.H., Newhook, T., Schirmer, B. et al. Late accidental dislodgement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube: an underestimated burden on patients and the health care system. Surg Endosc 25, 3307–3311 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1709-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1709-y

Keywords

Navigation