Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Novel handheld PET probes provide intraoperative localization of PET-avid lymph nodes

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The accurate intraoperative localization of malignant nodes can pose a challenge to the surgical oncologist. Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning has significantly increased our ability to detect suspicious lesions. We investigated the ability of a novel, handheld tool to evaluate suspicious nodes intraoperatively and to correlate its findings with those seen on preoperative PET scan.

Methods

Ten nude rats were inoculated with a lymphogenic mesothelioma tumor line and followed weekly with PET scan studies. When suspicious lymph nodes were found, animals were dissected and the intraoperative amount of tissue radiation was analyzed as “tumor-to-background ratio” (TBR) using the PET probes.

Results

The intraoperative probe was used to guide dissections and select high-risk nodes based on their specific radiotracer uptake. A total of 52 nodes were harvested; eight of these were suspicious on preoperative PET scan studies. Using a TBR of 2.5, the intraoperative probes were able to localize all suspicious nodes previously seen on PET scan. Both gamma (sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 86%; positive predictive value (PPV): 57%; negative predictive value (NPV): 100%) and beta (sensitivity: 88%; specificity: 91%; PPV: 64%; NPV: 98%) probes showed an excellent area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC). Both probes had an AUC of 0.95 for localizing suspicious nodes on PET scan. Furthermore, the AUC for detecting malignancy for the gamma probe was 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83–0.99), and for the beta probe it was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94–1.0), suggesting a better performance of the beta probe for detecting malignancy.

Conclusions

This novel tool may be used synergistically with the PET scan examination to maximize intraoperative nodal selection and sampling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buck AK, Reske SN (2004) Cellular origin and molecular mechanisms of 18F-FDG uptake: is there a contribution of the endothelium? J Nucl Med 45(3):461–463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gambhir SS (2002) Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography. Nat Rev Cancer 2(9):683–693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohn DE, Hall NC, Povoski SP, Seamon LG, Farrar WB, Martin EW Jr (2008) Novel perioperative imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT and intraoperative 18F-FDG detection using a handheld gamma probe in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 110(2):152–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gulec SA (2007) PET probe-guided surgery. J Surg Oncol 96(4):353–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gulec SA, Daghighian F, Essner R (2006) PET-Probe: evaluation of technical performance and clinical utility of a handheld high-energy gamma probe in oncologic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2006 Jul 24. doi:10.1245/ASO.2006.05.047

  6. Sheldon C (1952) Heterotransplantation of human cancer I. Irradiated rats. Cancer Res 12:909–911

    Google Scholar 

  7. Howard RB, Chu H, Zeligman BE, Marcell T, Bunn PA, McLemore TL et al (1991) Irradiated nude rat model for orthotopic human lung cancers. Cancer Res 51(12):3274–3280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kjonniksen I, Nesland JM, Pihl A, Fodstad O (1990) Nude rat model for studying metastasis of human tumor cells to bone and bone marrow. J Natl Cancer Inst 82(5):408–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Higashi T, Saga T, Ishimori T, Mamede M, Ishizu K, Fujita T et al (2004) What is the most appropriate scan timing for intraoperative detection of malignancy using 18F-FDG-sensitive gamma probe? Preliminary phantom and preoperative patient study. Ann Nucl Med 18(2):105–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bleiweiss IJ (2006) Sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer after 10 years: rethinking basic principles. Lancet Oncol 7(8):686–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mathelin C, Salvador S, Croce S, Andriamisandratsoa N, Huss D, Guyonnet JL (2007) Optimization of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer using an operative gamma camera. World J Surg Oncol 5:132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Keshtgar MR, Ell PJ (2002) Clinical role of sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 3(2):105–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nason KS, Anderson BO, Byrd DR, Dunnwald LK, Eary JF, Mankoff DA et al (2000) Increased false negative sentinel node biopsy rates after preoperative chemotherapy for invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 89(11):2187–2194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, Margolese R, Wolmark N, Wickerham L et al (1989) Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 320(13):822–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. van Dongen JA, Bartelink H, Fentiman IS, Lerut T, Mignolet F, Olthuis G et al (1992) Randomized clinical trial to assess the value of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer, EORTC 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 11:15–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Port ER, Fey J, Gemignani ML, Heerdt AS, Montgomery LL, Petrek JA et al (2002) Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new option for patients with primary or locally recurrent breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 195(2):167–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Daghighian F, Mazziotta JC, Hoffman EJ, Shenderov P, Eshaghian B, Siegel S et al (1994) Intraoperative beta probe: a device for detecting tissue labeled with positron or electron emitting isotopes during surgery. Med Phys 21(1):153–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonen M (2007) Analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves with SAS, 2007. SAS Press, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bellamy E et al (2007) The role of PET/CT in the investigation of patients presenting with pleural abnormalities. Cancer Imaging 7:S116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Segundo J. González, Joyce Wong, Lorena González, Peter Brader, Maureen Zakowski, Mithat Gönen, Young Fong, and Vivian E. Strong have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivian E. Strong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González, S.J., Wong, J., González, L. et al. Novel handheld PET probes provide intraoperative localization of PET-avid lymph nodes. Surg Endosc 25, 3214–3221 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1696-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1696-z

Keywords

Navigation