Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficiency and outcomes of harmonic device in transanal endoscopic microsurgery compared with monopolar scalpel

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

An important fact when facing new technologies is their cost for the Health Publishes. The purpose of this paper is to compare the costs of performing TEM with harmonic scalpel and classic monopolar scalpel and to analyze complications.

Methods

Operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay were recorded to determine the cost of the TEM procedure. We also recorded early and late complications. Patients were divided in two groups: harmonic scalpel group (UC) and monopolar scalpel group (MS).

Results

TEM for curative intention was used in 330 rectal tumors from January 1997 to January 2010. A total of 229 patients met the criteria for this study: UC group (n = 87) and MS group (n = 142). Patients from the UC group developed fewer complications (16%) than patients from the MS group (23%). The difference of mean stay between groups was 1.5 days (95% confidence interval, 0.7; 2.2 days; P < 0.001) in favor of the UC group.

Conclusions

Harmonic scalpel provides a safer, easier, and more precise surgical section through clean, bloodless, and better visualized operative field. The additional cost of UC was compensated with the decrease in the health resources (mainly hospital stay).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Büess G, Hutterer F, Theis J, Böbel M, Isselhard W, Pichlmaier (1984) Das system für die transanale endoskopische rektumoperation. Chirurg 55:677–680

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maslekar S, Pillinger SH, Monson JR (2007) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc 21:97–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Middleton PF, Sutherland LM, Maddern GJ (2005) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 48:270–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramirez JM, Aguilella V, Gracia JA, Ortego J, Escudero P, Valencia J, Esco R, Martinez M (2009) Local full-thickness excision as first line treatment for sessile rectal adenomas: long-term results. Ann Surg 249:225–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lirici MM, Di Paola M, Ponzano C, Hüscher CG (2003) Combining ultrasonic dissection and the Storz operation rectoscope. Surg Endosc 17(8):1292–1297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Langer C, Liersch T, Süss M (2003) Surgical cure for early rectal carcinoma and large adenoma: transanal endoscopic microsurgery (using ultrasound or electrosurgery) compared to conventional local and radical resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:222–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hermsen PE, Ayodeji ID, Hop WH, Tetteroo GW, de Graff GV (2009) Armonic long shears further reduce operation time in transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 23:2124–2130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ayodeji ID, Hop WC, Tetteroo GW, Bonjer HJ, de Graff GV (2004) Ultracision harmonic scalpel and multifunctional TEM400 instrument complement in transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 2:245–250

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carpenter J, Bithell J (2000) Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med 19:1141–1164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang H, Zhou XH (2004) Bootstrap confidence intervals for medical costs with censored observations. Stat Med 23:3365–3376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barber JA, Thompson SG (2000) Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap. Stat Med 19:3219–3236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramsey S, Willke R, Briggs A, Brown R, Buxton M, Chawla A, Cook J, Glick H, Liljas B, Petitti D, Reed S (2005) Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA task force Report. Value Health 8:521–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramirez JM, Aguilella V, Valencia J, Gracia JA, Escudero P, Ortego J, Martinez M (2010) Endoscopic surgery with curative intention for malignant rectal tumors. Long-term oncologic results. Endoscopy Published ahead of print

  14. Bretagnol F, Merrie A, George B (2007) Local excision of rectal tumours by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg 94:627–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, Feliciotti L (2002) Long-term results of patients with pT2 rectal cancer treated with radiotherapy and transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision. World J Surg 26:1170–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, Baldarelli M, De Sanctis A, Lezoche G (2005) Long-term results in patients with T2–3 N0 distal rectal cancer undergoing radiotherapy before transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg 92:1546–1552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Langer C, Markus P, Liersch T, Füzesi L, Becker H (2001) Ultracision or high-frequency knife in transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM)? Surg Endosc 15:513–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa I, Tsunoda I, Saito N (2009) Influence of learning curve on short-term results after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23:403–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bege T, Lelong B, Esterni B, Turrini O, Guiramand J, Francon D, Mokart D, Houvenaeghel G, Giovannini M, Delpero JM (2010) The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution’s experience. Ann Surg 251:249–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gracia Solanas JA, Ramírez Rodríguez JM, Aguilella Diago V, Elía Guedea M, Martínez Díez M (2006) A prospective study of the functional and anatomic consequences of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 98:234–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. J. A. Gracia, J. M. Ramirez, D. Callejo, M. Elia, S. Maeso, V. Aguilella, and M. Martinez have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Gracia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gracia, J.A., Ramirez, J.M., Callejo, D. et al. Efficiency and outcomes of harmonic device in transanal endoscopic microsurgery compared with monopolar scalpel. Surg Endosc 25, 3209–3213 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1695-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1695-0

Keywords

Navigation