Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of tissue compression on circular stapler line failure

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal anastomosis is a well-known and serious complication, yet there is no standardized approach to reliably create an anastomosis with sufficient mechanical properties to consistently avoid an anastomotic leak. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships among combined tissue thickness, tissue compression, closed staple limb length, and mechanical strength of an anastomosis created with a circular stapler, as measured by maximum intraluminal pressure obtained at the time of leakage.

Methods

Using 27 porcine stomachs and 27 porcine small-intestine segments, we measured tissue thickness and assessed the tissue compression at three different anvil closure distances created by a circular stapling device. Maximum intraluminal pressure was determined by infusing colored water into the porcine materials and increasing the pressure until leakage from the anastomosis occurred.

Results

Tissue compression increased as the closure distance narrowed between the anvil and circular stapler (p < .0001). A tissue compression of ≥6 PSI correlated strongly with a maximum intraluminal pressure of ≥18 mmHg (43% for <6 PSI vs. 90% for ≥6 PSI; p = .02); tissue compression ≥12 PSI was necessary to obtain an acute maximum intraluminal pressure of ≥22 mmHg in 13 of 15 of our samples (p = .04).

Conclusions

Maximum intraluminal pressure of an anastomosis in this porcine model correlated most strongly with the compression of the tissue involved in the anastomosis. This experimental model provides a framework for constructing a systematic approach to creating an anastomosis with sufficient mechanical strength. However, this study was not intended to establish the upper range of tissue compression beyond which a permanent tissue injury may occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Veyrie N, Ata T, Muscari F, Couchard AC, Msika S, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Dziri C, French Associations for Surgical Research (2007) Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer, prevalence and independent risk factors. J Am Coll Surg 205:785–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chung RS, Hitch DC, Armstrong DN (1988) The role of tissue ischemia in the pathogenesis of anastomotic stricture. Surgery 104:824–829

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung RS (1987) Blood flow in colonic anastomoses. Effect of stapling and suturing. Ann Surg 206:335–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker RS, Foote J, Kemmeter P, Brady R, Vroegop T, Serveld M (2004) The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg 14:1290–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T, Davies OG (2000) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg 135:1029–1033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lönroth H, Dalenbäck J, Haglind E, Lundell L (1996) Laparoscopic gastric bypass. Another option in bariatric surgery. Surg Encosc 10:636–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Schubert KR (1996) Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: technique and results in 75 patients with 3–30 months follow-up. Obes Surg 6:500–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrasquilla C, English WJ, Esposito P, Gianos J (2004) Total stapled, total intra-abdominal (TSTI) laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: one leak in 1,000 cases. Obes Surg 14:613–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carucci LR, Turner MA, Conklin RC, DeMaria EJ, Kellum JM, Sugerman HJ (2006) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity: evaluation of postoperative extraluminal leaks with upper gastrointestinal series. Radiology 238:119–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Madan AK, Lanier B, Tichansky DS (2006) Laparoscopic repair of gastrointestinal leaks after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Am Surg 72:586–590

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andrew CG, Hanna W, Look D, McLean AP, Christou NV (2006) Early results after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: effect of the learning curve. Can J Surg 49:417–421

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shikora SA (2004) The use of staple-line reinforcement during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg 14:1313–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elariny H, Gonzáles H, Wang B (2005) Tissue thickness of human stomach measured on excised gastric specimens from obese patients. Surg Technol Int 14:119–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Didolkar MS, Reed WP, Elias EG, Schnaper LA, Brown SD, Chaudhary SM (1986) A prospective randomized study of sutured versus stapled bowel anastomoses in patients with cancer. Cancer 57:456–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chassin JL, Rifkind KM, Sussman B, Kassel B, Fingaret A, Drager S, Chassin PS (1978) The stapled gastrointestinal tract anastomosis: incidence of postoperative complications compared with the sutured anastomosis. Ann Surg 188:689–696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwab R, Wessendorf S, Gutcke A, Becker P (2002) Early bursting strength of human colon anastomoses—an in vitro study comparing current anastomotic techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386:507–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie AEH (2007) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD004320

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mery CM, Shafi BM, Binyamin G, Morton JM, Gertner M (2008) Profiling surgical staplers: effect of staple height, buttress, and overlap on staple line failure. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:416–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by an investigator-initiated research grant from Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.

Disclosures

Dr. Myers is a consultant for Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. Drs. Rothermel and Shaffer have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan R. Myers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myers, S.R., Rothermel, W.S. & Shaffer, L. The effect of tissue compression on circular stapler line failure. Surg Endosc 25, 3043–3049 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1667-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1667-4

Keywords

Navigation