Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability of gastric access closure with the self-approximating transluminal access technique (STAT) for NOTES

  • Endoluminal Surgery
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

STAT, or the self-approximating transluminal access technique, has been previously described and involves the dissection of a submucosal tunnel for peritoneal or mediastinal access from the esophagus and stomach. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and reliability of gastric access and closure in a porcine experience using STAT for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Methods

A review of the experience using STAT access tunnels for intraperitoneal access was performed in 39 female pigs at a university animal lab. All animals underwent a predetermined NOTES surgical procedure using a STAT transgastric access tunnel based on a specific protocol. Details of the procedure, complications, and clinical course were documented. Necropsy was performed at 2 weeks. The main outcome measurements were clinical or necropsy evidence of gastrostomy site leak or inadequate access site closure.

Results

STAT was successful in providing safe peritoneal access in all animals. The width of the tunnel ranged from 1.5 to 5.5 cm and the length was up to 27 cm. There was no evidence of gastrostomy site leak in any animals. One animal required a single laparoscopic suture to help with tunnel closure.

Conclusion

STAT provides safe transgastric access and allows secure closure of the gastrotomy site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martin IJ, O’Rourke NA, Maddern GJ (2008) A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting. Ann Surg 247(4):583–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hazey JW, Narula VK, Renton DB, Reavis KM, Paul CM, Hinshaw KE, Muscarella P, Ellison EC, Melvin WS (2008) Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: Initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22(1):16–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60(1):114–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Chung SS, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Magee CA, Vaughn CA, Barlow D, Shimonaka H, Kalloo AN (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62(2):287–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaouk JH, White WM, Goel RK, Brethauer S, Crouzet S, Rackley RR, Moore C, Ingber MS, Haber GP (2009) NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy: first human experience. Urology 74(1):5–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McGee MF, Rosen MJ, Marks J, Onders RP, Chak A, Faulx A, Chen VK, Ponsky J (2006) A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm. Surg Innov 13(2):86–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Song S, Itawi EA, Saber AA (2009) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). J Invest Surg 22(3):214–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arezzo A, Morino M (2010) Endoscopic closure of gastric access in perspective NOTES: an update on techniques and technologies. Surg Endosc 24(2):298–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hookey LC, Khokhotva V, Bielawska B, Samis A, Jalink D, Hurlbut D, Mercer D (2009) The Queen’s closure: a novel technique for closure of endoscopic gastrotomy for natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Endoscopy 41(2):149–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sporn E, Miedema BW, Astudillo JA, Bachman SL, Loy TS, Davis JW, Calaluce R, Thaler K (2008) Gastrotomy creation and closure for NOTES using a gastropexy technique (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 68(5):948–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalloo AN (2007) Is STAT (self-approximating translumenal access technique) the first step for NOTES? Gastrointest Endosc 66(5):979–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moyer MT, Pauli EM, Haluck RS, Mathew A (2007) A self-approximating transluminal access technique for potential use in NOTES: an ex vivo porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 66(5):974–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pauli EM, Haluck RS, Mathew A, Ionescu AM, Rogers AM, Moyer MT, Shope TR (2009) Directed submucosal tunneling for transtastric NOTES procedures. Surg Endosc 24(6):1474–1481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pauli EM, Moyer MT, Haluck RS, Mathew A (2008) Self-approximating transluminal access technique for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a porcine survival study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 67(4):690–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. AVMA Panel on Euthanasia, American Veterinary Medical Association (2001) 2000 Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia. J Am Vet Med Assoc 218(5):669–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moyer MT, Pauli EM, Gopal J, Mathew A, Haluck RS (2011) Durability of the self-approximating translumenal access technique (STAT) for potential use in natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES). Surgic Endosc 25(1):315–321; discussion 321–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. von Delius S, Gillen S, Doundoulakis E, Schneider A, Wilhelm D, Fiolka A, Wagenpfeil S, Schmid RM, Feussner H, Meining A (2008) Comparison of transgastric access techniques for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 68(5):940–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Knipschield MA, Chung S, Cotton PB, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy V, Pasricha PJ (2007) Transgastric cholecystectomy: transgastric accessibility to the gallbladder improved with the SEMF method and a novel multibending therapeutic endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 65(7):1028–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carney E, Pauli E, Haluck R, Moyer M, Mathew A (2008) A review of porcine foregut anatomy for the beginning endoscopic researcher. Am J Gastroenterol 103:S482–S482

    Google Scholar 

  20. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42(4):265–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mathew A, Moyer M, Yeasted NJ (2009) Submucosal dissection and isolation of a congenital tracheoesophageal fistula for potential endoscopic therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 70(4):806–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mathew A, Pauli EM, Moyer MM, Haluck RS (2008) Heller-type cardiomyotomy using NOTES. Endoscopy 40(4):352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I, Chen J, Cotton PB, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy SV, Gostout CJ (2007) Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy 39(9):761–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pauli EM, Mathew A, Haluck RS, Ionescu AM, Moyer MT, Shope TR, Rogers AM (2008) Technique for transesophageal endoscopic cardiomyotomy (Heller myotomy): video presentation at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2008, Philadelphia, PA. Surg Endosc 22(10):2279–2280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the dedicated staff of the Department of Comparative Medicine (Dr. Ronald Wilson and Ms. Joy Ellwanger). We also acknowledge support from Olympus Endoscopy for routine and prototype scopes and accessories, Boston Scientific for endoscopic accessories, and Pentax USA for endoscopes. Protocol 2 was supported by a grant from SAGES, protocol 3 was supported by a grant from NOSCAR, protocol 4 was funded by Life Cell Corporation, and protocol 5 by supported a grant from Association of Women Surgeons.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abraham Mathew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mathew, A., Tomasko, J.M., Pauli, E.M. et al. Reliability of gastric access closure with the self-approximating transluminal access technique (STAT) for NOTES. Surg Endosc 25, 2718–2724 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1659-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1659-4

Keywords

Navigation