Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been around since the 1990s. A novel surgical approach known as laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has been developed to reduce the port-related morbidities and improve the cosmetic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery, including totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the LESS TEP technique for inguinal hernia repair and compare the outcomes with the standard TEP approach.
Methods
Between January and May 2009, 54 consecutive healthy patients (48 men and 6 women) underwent LESS TEP inguinal hernia repair at our institute. All procedures were performed using our homemade single port for simultaneous passage of the laparoscope and instruments. The perioperative data, including patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), hernia characteristics, operative time, complications, length of hospital stay, return to normal activity, pain score, and cosmetic result, were prospectively collected.
Results
All LESS TEP procedures were completed successfully without conversion to standard laparoscopic or open surgery. A total of 98 LESS TEP hernia repairs were performed in 54 patients and compared with 152 standard TEP operations. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the standard TEP series (61.8 ± 26.0 vs. 70.9 ± 23.8 min, p = 0.04). Other perioperative parameters, including the length of hospital stay, time until return to full activity, complication rate, pain score, and cosmetic result, were all comparable between the two techniques.
Conclusion
Our short-term experience with LESS TEP inguinal hernia repair has shown that in experienced hands, inguinal hernia repair via the LESS TEP technique is as safe as the standard TEP technique. However, based on our evidence, we currently believe that the LESS TEP technique is not an efficacious surgical alternative to the standard TEP technique for inguinal hernias.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dulucq JL (1992) Treatment of inguinal hernia by insertion of a subperitoneal patch under pre-peritoneoscopy. Chirurgie 118:83–85
Kapiris SA, Brough WA, Royston CM, O’Boyle C, Sedman PC (2001) Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017 patients. Surg Endosc 15:972–975
Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2009) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3, 100 hernia repairs over 15 years. Surg Endosc 23:482–486
Liem MS, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547
Kommu SS, Chakravarti A, Luscombe CJ, Golash A, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Gill IS, Cadeddu JA, Rané A (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and NOTES: standardised platforms in nomenclature. BJU Int 103:701–702
Teixeira J, McGill K, Binenbaum S, Forrester G (2009) Laparoscopic single-site surgery for placement of an adjustable gastric band: initial experience. Surg Endosc 23(6):1409–1414
Hong TH, You YK, Lee KH (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Scarless cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 23(6):1393–1397
Castellucci SA, Curcillo PG, Ginsberg PC, Saba SC, Jaffe JS, Harmon JD (2008) Single port access adrenalectomy. J Endourol 22:1573–1576
Aron M, Canes D, Desai MM, Haber GP, Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 103:516–521
Rané A, Rao P, Rao P (2008) Single-port-access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-port). Urology 72:260–263
Gill IS, Canes D, Aron M, Haber GP, Goldfarb DA, Flechner S, Desai MR, Kaouk JH, Desai MM (2008) Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. J Urol 180:637–641
Tai HC, Lin CD, Wu CC, Tsai YC, Yang SS (2010) Homemade transumbilical port: an alternative access for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Surg Endosc 24:705–708
Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK (2003) Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17:850–856
Garg P, Menon GR, Rajagopal M, Ismail M (2010) Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc 24:450–454
Hoffman A, Leshem E, Zmora O, Nachtomi O, Shabtai M, Ayalon A, Rosin D (2010) The combined laparoscopic approach for the treatment of incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 24(8):1815–1818
Staarink M, van Veen RN, Hop WC, Weidema WF (2008) A 10-year follow-up study on endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 22:1803–1806
Ferzli G, Shapiro K, Chaudry G, Patel S (2004) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach to acutely incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 18:228–231
Disclosure
Huai-Ching Tai, Chia-Da Lin, Shiu-Dong Chung, Shih-Chieh Jeff Chueh, Yao-Chou Tsai, and Stephen Shei-Dei Yang have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tai, HC., Lin, CD., Chung, SD. et al. A comparative study of standard versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 25, 2879–2883 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1636-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1636-y