Skip to main content

Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Surgical Endoscopy volume 25, pages 1814–1821 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Surgical management of left colonic cancer presenting as an acute obstruction remains controversial and still is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Recently, self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) have been used as a bridge to surgery in an attempt to decompress the colon and then allow elective one-stage surgical resection without stoma placement. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of emergency surgery alone with emergency placement of colonic SEMS as a bridge to surgery in terms of efficiency and reduction of the stoma placement rate.

Methods

A multicenter prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted according to the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) Statement criteria. Patients eligible for the study were randomized to either emergency surgery or emergency SEMS as a bridge to surgery. The primary outcome was the need for a stoma (temporary or permanent) for any reason. The secondary end points were mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay.

Results

Nine centers participated in the trial. Among the 70 patients eligible for the study, 60 were randomized and included for the final analysis, 30 patients in each group. Seven patients were randomized but did not fulfill the entry requirements, whereas three further eligible patients were not randomized for various reasons. Concerning the primary outcome, 17 patients in the surgery group sustained a stoma placement versus 13 patients in the SEMS group (p = 0.30). No statistically significant difference was noted concerning the secondary outcomes. A total of 16 attempts at SEMS placement (53.3%) were technical failures. Two colonic perforations directly related to the stent placement procedure occurred among the 30 randomized patients and 1 perforation occurred among the nonrandomized patients, leading to premature closure of inclusions in the study before the expected number of 80 patients was reached.

Conclusion

This randomized trial failed to demonstrate that emergency preoperative SEMS for patients presenting with acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction could significantly decrease the need for stoma placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. De Salvo GL, Gava C, Pucciarelli S, Lise M (2004) Curative surgery for obstruction from primary left colorectal carcinoma: primary or staged resection? Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD002101

  2. Breitenstein S, Rickenbacher A, Berdajs D, Puhan M, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2007) Systematic evaluation of surgical strategies for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction. Br J Surg 94:1451–1460

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tekkis PP, Kinsman R, Thompson MR, Stamatakis JD, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain, Ireland (2004) The Association of Coloprotology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:76–81

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K, Association Française de Chirurgie (2005) Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg 140:278–283

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deans GT, Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST (1994) Malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg 81:1270–1276

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mealy K, O’Brian E, Donohue J, Tanner A, Keane FB (1996) Reversible colostomy: what is the outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 39:1227–1231

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dohmoto M (1991) New method: endoscopic implantation of rectal stent in palliative treatment of malignant stenosis. Endosc Dig 3:1507–1512

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tejero E, Fernandez Lobato R, Mainar A, Montes C, Pinto I, Fernández L et al (1997) Initial results of a new procedure for treatment of malignant obstruction of the left colon. Dis Colon Rectum 40:432–436

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baron TH, Dean PA, Yates MR III, Canon C, Koehler RE (1998) Expandable metal stents for the treatment of colonic obstruction: techniques and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 47:277–286

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Camunez F, Eschenagusia A, Simo G, Turégano F, Vázquez J, Barreiro-Meiro I (2000) Malignant colorectal obstruction treated by means of self-expanding metallic stents: effectiveness before surgery and in palliation. Radiology 216:492–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sebastian S, Johnston S, Geoghegan S, Torreggiani W, Buckley M (2004) Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of self-expanding metal stenting in malignant colorectal obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol 99:2051–2057

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Watt AM, Faragher IG, Griffin TT, Rieger NA, Maddern GJ (2007) Self-expanding metallic stents for relieving malignant colorectal obstruction: a systematic review. Ann Surg 246:24–30

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tilney HS, Lovegrove RE, Purkayastha S, Sains PS, Weston-Petrides GK, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP, Heriot AG (2007) Comparison of colonic stenting and open surgery for malignant large bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc 21:225–233

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheung HYS, Chung CC, Tsang WWC, Wong JCH, Yau KKK, Li MKW (2009) Endolaparoscopic approach vs conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer. Arch Surg 144:1127–1132

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Hooft JE, Bemelman WA, Breumelhof R, Siersema PD, Kruyt PM, van der Linde K et al (2007) Colonic stenting as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for management of acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized trial (stent-in 2 study). BMC Surg 7:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Anthony T, Baron T, Mercadante S, Green S, Chi D, Cunningham J et al (2007) Report of the clinical protocol committee: development of randomized trials for malignant bowel obstruction. J Pain Symptom Manag 34:S49–S59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tekkis PP, Kocher HM, Bentley AJ, Cullen PT, South LM, Trotter GA, Ellul JP (2000) Operative mortality rates among surgeons: comparison of POSSUM and p-POSSUM scoring systems in gastrointestinal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1528–1532

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kwiatkowski F, Girard M, Hacene K, Berlie J (2000) SEM: a suitable statistical software adapted for research in oncology. Bull Cancer 87:715–721

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2010

  20. Khot UP, Wenk Lang A, Murali K, Parker MC (2002) Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of colorectal stents. Br J Surg 89:1096–1102

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez-Santos C, Lobato RF, Fradejas JM, Pinto I, Ortega-Deballon P, Moreno-Azcoita M (2002) Self-expandable stent before elective surgery vs emergency surgery for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstructions: comparison of primary anastomosis and morbidity rates. Dis Colon Rectum 45:401–406

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Hooft JE, Fockens P, Marinelli A, Bossuyt PM, Bemelman WA (2006) Premature closure of the Dutch Stent-in I study. Lancet 368:1573–1574

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maruthachalam K, Lash GE, Shenton BK, Horgan AF (2007) Tumour cell dissemination following endoscopic stent insertion. Br J Surg 94:1151–1154

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The metallic stent devices were provided free of charge by BARD France SAS. Financial support was provided by the hospital clinical research program (PHRC), Montpellier University Hospital and by the A.F.S.S.A.P.S. (Agence Française de Sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé). The study was performed by the cooperation of the following investigators: D. Collet (Digestive Surgery Unit), J. Drouillard (Medical Imaging Unit), Bordeaux University Hospital, France; F. Michot, O. Foulatier (Digestive Surgery Unit), E. Lerebours, P. Ducrotte, M. Antonietti, E. Bensoussan (Gastroenterology Unit), Rouen University Hospital, France; J. P. Triboulet, C. Mariette (Digestive Surgery Unit), O. Ernst (Digestive and Endocrine Imaging Unit), Lille University Hospital, France; B. Suc, F. Muscari (Digestive Surgery Unit), P. Otal (Medical Imaging Unit), Toulouse University Hospital, France; B. Meunier (Digestive Surgery Unit), S. Manfredi (Gastroenterology Unit) Rennes University Hospital, France; J. P. Arnaud (Digestive Surgery Unit), C. Aubé, C. Ridereau (Medical Imaging Unit), Angers University Hospital, France; C. Letoublon, E. Desroche (Digestive Surgery Unit), C. Sengel (Medical Imaging Unit), Grenoble University Hospital, France; J. M. Hay, S. Msika (Digestive Surgery Unit), M. Levesque (Medical Imaging Unit), University Hospital Louis Mourrier, Colombes, France; P. Puche, P. M. Blanc, H. Bouyabrine (Digestive Surgery Unit), B. Gallix (Medical Imaging Unit), A. Mouraret, C. Lacombe (Clinical Research Associates), Montpellier University Hospital. The protocol has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier number NCT00514332.

Disclosures

Isabelle A. Pirlet, Karem Slim, Fabrice Kwiatkowski, Francis Michot, and Bertrand L. Millat have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Digestive Surgery Unit, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier Cedex 5, France

    Isabelle A. Pirlet & Bertrand L. Millat

  2. Digestive Surgery Unit, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France

    Karem Slim

  3. Department of Statistics, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France

    Fabrice Kwiatkowski

  4. Digestive Surgery Unit, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France

    Francis Michot

Authors
  1. Isabelle A. Pirlet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karem Slim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fabrice Kwiatkowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francis Michot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bertrand L. Millat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bertrand L. Millat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pirlet, I.A., Slim, K., Kwiatkowski, F. et al. Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25, 1814–1821 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1471-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1471-6

Keywords

  • Acute obstruction
  • Colonic cancer
  • Self-expandable metallic stent
  • Stoma placement