Skip to main content
Log in

Guidelines for institutions granting bariatric privileges utilizing laparoscopic techniques

  • Guidelines
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Dent TL (1991) Clinical privileges for laparoscopic general surgery. Am J Surg 161:399–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. E.A.E.S. Guidelines (1994) Training and assessment of competence. Surg Endosc 8:721–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Greene FL (1991) Training credentialing and privileging for minimally invasive surgery. Probl Gen Surg 8:502–506

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jakimowicz J (1994) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, recommendations for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol 83:137–141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. JCAHO (2001) Automated comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals. Update 2 May 2001

  6. Laparoscopic surgery. New York State Department of Health Memorandum, Series 92-20, Albany, New York, June 12, 1992

  7. Ooi LLPJ (1996) Training in laparoscopic surgery: have we got it right yet? Ann Acad Med 25:732–736

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwaitzberg SD, Connolly RJ, Sant GR, Reindollar R, Cleveland RJ (1996) Planning, development, and execution of an international training program in laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:10–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. See WA, Cooper CS, Fisher RJ (1993) Predictors of laparoscopic complications after formal training in laparoscopic surgery. JAMA 270:2689–2692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (1994) Framework for post-residency surgical education and training: a SAGES guideline. Publication #0017. Surg Endosc 8:1137–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (1991) Granting of privileges for laparoscopic general surgery. Am J Surg 161:324–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (2001) SAGES position statement—statement on first assistants. Available by request from SAGES

  13. Wexner SD, Weiss EG (1994) A recommended training schema for laparoscopic surgery: the future of laparoscopy in oncology. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 3:759–765

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wexner SD, Weiss EG (1994) Training and preparation for laparoscopic colectomy. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 5:224–227

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maher J et al (2008) Four hundred fifty consecutive laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses with no mortality and declining leak rates and lengths of stay in a bariatric training program. JACS 206(5):940–944

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frezza E et al (2004) Bariatric and associated operations in private and academic practices. Obes Surg 14(10):1406–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Trieu HT et al (2007) Safety and outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery in patients 60 years of age and older. Surg Obes Related Dis 3(3):383–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Madan AK et al (2007) Establishing a laparoscopic bariatric program in a safety net hospital. Surg Endosc 21(5):801–804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kothari SN et al (2005) Training of a minimally invasive bariatric surgeon: are laparoscopic fellowships the answer? Obes Surg 15(3):323–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen NT et al (2004) The practice of bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. J Gastrointest Surg 8(7):856–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Belle SH et al (2007) Safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery: longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Related Dis 3(2):116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Livingston EH et al (2006) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis of bariatric operations: modifiable risk factors contribute to bariatric surgical adverse outcomes. JACS 203(5):625–633

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenthal RJ et al (2006) Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity: 1001 consecutive bariatric operations performed at The Bariatric Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida. Obes Surg 16(2):119–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burhop J et al (2005) Laparoscopic bariatric surgery can be performed safely in the community hospital setting. WMJ 104(5):48–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rendon SE et al (2005) Quality assurance in bariatric surgery. Surg Clin N Am 85(4):757–771, vi–vii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kelly JJ, Shikora S, Jones DB, Hutter MH, Robinson MK, Romanelli J, Buckley F, Lederman A, Blackburn GL, Lautz D (2009) Best practice updates for surgical care in weight loss surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring) 17(5):863–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jones SB, Jones DB (2009) Obesity surgery: patient safety and best practices. Cine-Med Inc., Woodbury

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Ronald H. Clements is a consultant for Olympus, was on a review panel for Covidien, and was on an advisory committee for Cardinal Healthcare/Snowden-Pencer. Dr. Julio A. Teixeira was a consultant for Novare and for Ethicon Endoscopy, was on the advisory committee for Allergan Inc., and was a speaker/teacher for Covidien. Dr. Robert D. Fanelli is a board member of New Wave Surgical Corporation, received honoraria from Ethicon Endo-Surgery for speaking/teaching, received honoraria from Boston Scientific Corporation, Inc for speaking/teaching, and was an independent contractor for Cook Surgical, Inc. Drs. David Provost, William S. Richardson, and Alan A. Saber have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclosure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Clements.

Additional information

Disclaimer: Guidelines for clinical practice are intended to indicate preferable approaches to medical problems as established by experts in the field. These recommendations will be based on existing data or a consensus of expert opinion when little or no data are available.

Guidelines are applicable to all physicians who address the clinical problem(s) without regard to specialty training or interests, and are intended to indicate the preferable, but not necessarily the only acceptable approaches due to the complexity of the healthcare environment. Guidelines are intended to be flexible. Given the wide range of specifics in any health care problem, the surgeon must always choose the course best suited to the individual patient and the variables in existence at the moment of decision.

Guidelines are developed under the auspices of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and its various committees, and approved by the Board of Governors. Each clinical practice guideline has been systematically researched, reviewed, and revised by the guidelines committee, and reviewed by an appropriate multidisciplinary team. The recommendations are considered valid at the time of its production based on the data available. Each guideline is scheduled for periodic review to allow incorporation of pertinent new developments in medical research knowledge and practice.

Appendix

Appendix

This document was prepared and revised by the SAGES Guidelines Committee:

Ronald Clements, MD

Alan Saber, MD

Julio Teixeira, MD

David Provost, MD (Bariatric Liaison Group)

Robert Fanelli, MD (Chair)

William Richardson, MD (Co-Chair)

Dimitrios Stefanidis, MD

James Korndorffer, MD

D. Wayne Overby, MD

David Earle, MD

Geoffrey Kohn, MD

Keith Apelgren, MD

Alana Chuck, MD

Timothy Farrell, MD

Keith Gersin, MD

Jeffrey Hazey, MD

Ted Khalili, MD

Erika Fellinger, MD

Stephen Haggerty, MD

Steven Heneghan, MD

James Korndorffer, MD

Thom Lobe, MD

Sumeet Mittal, MD

Jonathan Myers, MD

Raymond Price, MD

Patrick Reardon, MD

William Reed, MD

David Renton, MD

E. Matt Ritter, MD

J. Salameh, MD

It was reviewed and approved by SAGES Bariatric Liaison Group and the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), July 2009.

For additional information, visit: http://sages.org/publications/guidelines/guidelines.php

This is a revision of SAGES publication originally printed 5/03.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clements, R., Saber, A., Teixeira, J. et al. Guidelines for institutions granting bariatric privileges utilizing laparoscopic techniques. Surg Endosc 25, 671–676 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1364-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1364-8

Keywords

Navigation