Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 1245–1250 | Cite as

Effects of intraoperative breaks on mental and somatic operator fatigue: a randomized clinical trial

  • Carsten EngelmannEmail author
  • Mischa Schneider
  • Clemens Kirschbaum
  • Gudela Grote
  • Jens Dingemann
  • Stefan Schoof
  • Benno M. Ure



Intermittent work breaks are common in fields with high workload but not yet for surgeons during operations. We evaluated the effects of intraoperative breaks during complex laparoscopic surgery (5 min every half hour) on the surgeon.


Fifty-one operations were randomized to a scheme with intraoperative breaks and release of the pneumoperitoneum (intermittent pneumoperitoneum (IPP)) or conventional conduct (CPP). Stress hormones and α-amylase were determined in the surgeon’s saliva pre-, intra-, and postoperatively. Mental performance and error scores, musculoskeletal strain, and continuous ECG were secondary endpoints.


Regular intraoperative breaks did not prolong the operation (IPP vs. CPP group: 176 vs. 180 min, p > 0.05). The surgeon’s cortisol levels during the operation were reduced by 22 ± 10.3% in the IPP vs. the CPP group (p < 0.05). There were significantly fewer (p < 0.05) intraoperative events in the IPP vs. the CPP group, which yielded higher α-amylase peaks. The pre- to postoperative increase in the error rates of the bp-concentration test was fourfold reduced in the IPP group (p = 0.052). The relevant locomotive strain-scores were grossly reduced by IPP (p < 0.001).


Our data support the idea that work breaks during complex laparoscopic surgery can reduce psychological stress and preserve performance without prolongation of the operation time compared with the traditional work scheme.


Intermittent pneumoperitoneum Work breaks Complex laparoscopic surgery Stress hormones Concentration–error performance 



We thank D. Auge and A. Osthaus, MHH for expert help with ECG systems and cardiac output determination, Dr. Judith Orsanu from NASA’s Ames research center in California for discussion, and Prof. R. Dietrich, Humbold University Berlin/Germany for information on simultaneous translation and Mr. Bill Groundwater, Kirkwall/Orkney for help with the manuscript.


This study was financed from the Hannover Medical School general health care budget. Drs. Engelmann, Schneider, Dingemann, Schoof, Ure, and Professors Kirschbaum and Grote have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Farmer E, Brownson A (2003) Review of workload measurement, analysis and interpretation methods (CARE-Integra-TRS-130-02-WP2). 1130 Brussels, Belgium, Rue de la Fusée 96: EurocontrolGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    AICC. Guidelines for simultaneous translation. Accessed 2008
  3. 3.
    Kilian H (1957) Hinter uns steht nur der Herrgott [“Behind us only god”]. Kindler Publishers, München, pp 1–385Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brookhuis KA, de Waard D (2002) On the assessment of (mental) workload and other subjective qualifications. Ergonomics 45:1026–1030, discussion 1042–1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Janssen WH (2004) Route planning and route guidance: a review of the literature (Report IZF 1979-C13). Instituut voor Zintuigfysiologie, SoesterbergGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Donnel RD, Eggemeier FT (1986) Workload assessment methodology. In: Boff KR, Kaufmann L, Thomas JP (eds) Handbook of perception and human performance. Volume II, cognitive processes and performance. Wiley, New York, pp 42/1–42/49Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DT (determination) test Accessed 2008
  8. 8.
    Wickens CD (1991) Processing resources and attention. In: Damos DL (ed) Multiple-task performance. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3–34Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mulder G, Mulder LJM (1980) Coping with mental workload. In: Levine S, Ursin H (eds) Coping and health. Plenum Press, New York, pp 233–258Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leung AW, Chan CC, Ng JJ, Wong PC (2006) Factors contributing to officers’ fatigue in high-speed maritime craft operations. Appl Ergon 37:565–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wickens CD (1992) Engineering psychology and human performance. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nater UM, La Marca R, Florin L, Moses A, Langhans W, Koller MM, Ehlert U (2006) Stress-induced changes in human salivary alpha-amylase activity—associations with adrenergic activity. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31:49–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holder G (2006) Measurement of glucocorticoids in biological fluids. Methods Mol Biol 324:141–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    U.S. Department of Defense (1999) Human engineering program process and procedures (MIL-HDBK-46855A)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brickenkamp R, Yillmer E (1998) The d2 test of attention, 1st U.S. edn. Hogrefe & Huber, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 139–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weston-Lovelock K, Abram A (1996) Establishing the reliability of behaviorally anchored rating scales at the RCB (report no. PLSD/CHS/HS3/CR96055/1.0). DERA, FarnboroughGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fitts PM (1966) Cognitive aspects of information processing: III. Set for speed versus accuracy. J Exp Psychol 71:849–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Damos DL (1996) Multiple-tasks performance. Taylor and Francis Ltd, London, pp 328–360Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kirschbaum C, Hellhammer DH (1994) Salivary cortisol in psychoneuroendocrine research: recent developments and applications. Psychoneuroendocrinology 19:313–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rohleder N, Wolf JM, Malsonado EF, Kirschbaum C (2006) The psychosocial stress-induced increase in salivary alpha-amylase is independent of saliva flow rate. Psychophysiology 43:645–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kantowitz BH (1987) Mental workload. In: Hancock PA (ed) Human factors psychology. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 81–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cook NJ (1992) Salivary cortisol and testosterone as markers of stress in normal subjects in abnormal situations. In: Kirschbaum C (ed) Assessment of hormones and drugs in saliva in biobehavioral research. Hogrefe & Huber, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McCraty R (1998) The impact of a new emotional self-management program on stress, emotions, heart rate variability, DHEA and cortisol. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 33:151–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gartner WB, Murphy MR (1979) Concepts of workload. In: Hartman BO, McKenyie RE (eds) Survey of methods to assess workload; AGARDograph no. 246. AGARD, Neuilly-sur-SeineGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hankins TC, Wilson GF (1998) A comparison of heart rate, eye activity, EEG and subjective measures of pilot mental workload during flight. Aviat Space Environ Med 69:360–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Egan JP (1975) Signal detection theory and ROC analysis. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meister D (1976) Behavioral foundation of system development. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carsten Engelmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mischa Schneider
    • 1
  • Clemens Kirschbaum
    • 2
  • Gudela Grote
    • 3
  • Jens Dingemann
    • 1
  • Stefan Schoof
    • 4
  • Benno M. Ure
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Department of BiopsychologyTechnical University DresdenDresdenGermany
  3. 3.Department of Management Technology and EconomicsETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Department of Pediatric CardiologyHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations