Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The challenges with NOTES retroperitoneal access in humans

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Animal studies have supported natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) retroperitoneal access. NOTES also may offer unique retroperitoneal access in humans.

Objectives

This study was designed to assess the feasibility of endoscopic transgastric and transrectal retroperitoneal access in a cadaver model using prone and supine positioning, and to compare NOTES retroperitoneal examination with endoscopic ultrasound.

Methods

Using a multidisciplinary team, this institutional review board-approved study evaluated transgastric and transrectal retroperitoneal examination in six cadavers (3 male, 3 female; body mass index range, 25–37 kg/m2). Endoscopic ultrasound retroperitoneal examination preceded NOTES access. Transgastric Access: Using a prototype dual channel endoscope, a needle knife gastrotomy was created on the preantral posterior gastric wall. Retroperitoneal examination specifically targeted the pancreas and surrounding structures with the cadaver supine and prone. Transrectal Access: Using the same endoscope, a posterior needle knife rectotomy distal to the upper valve of Houston provided extraluminal access. Retroperitoneal examination proceeded with the cadaver prone and supine. Open dissection followed procedure completion.

Results

Access into the retroperitoneum succeeded at all sites. Significant challenges locating identifiable landmarks were faced—mostly transrectal and improved transgastric prone. All cadavers, despite body mass index or sex, had significant retroperitoneal adipose tissue limiting the endoscopic view.

Conclusions

Although porcine studies have highlighted successful NOTES retroperitoneal procedures, the abundant human retroperitoneal adipose tissue challenged the translation of porcine research to humans. Additionally, although access to the retroperitoneal space and dissection within this space were accomplished easily, the appearance of cadaveric tissue and lack of blood flow made confident landmark identification impossible. Further study should continue in this area and focus on confident landmark identification for directed dissection. In a cadaveric model, this would best be improved by pre-NOTES anatomic marking or active perfusion of vasculature along with consideration of direct entry into the retroperitoneum from a targeted intraperitoneal site in clinical patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perretta S, Allemann P, Asakuma M, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2009) Adrenalectomy using natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a transvaginal retroperitoneal approach. Surg Endosc 23:1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allemann P, Perretta S, Marescaux J (2009) Surgical access to the adrenal gland: the quest for a “no visible scar” approach. Surg Oncol 18:131–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zacharopoulou C, Nassif J, Allemann P, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Marescaux J, Wattiez A (2009) Exploration of the retroperitoneum using the transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:198–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Escourrou J, Shehab H, Buscail L, Bournet B, Andrau P, Moreau J, Fourtanier G (2008) Peroral transgastric/transduodenal necrosectomy: success in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis. Ann Surg 248:1074–1080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baron TH, Thaggard WG, Morgan DE, Stanley RJ (1996) Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology 111:755–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seewald S, Groth S, Omar S, Imazu H, Seitz U, de Weerth A, Soetikno R, Zhong Y, Sriram PV, Ponnudurai R, Sikka S, Thonke F, Soehendra N (2005) Aggressive endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess: a new safe and effective treatment algorithm. Gastrointest Endosc 62:92–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Charnley RM, Lochan R, Gray H, O’Sullivan CB, Scott J, Oppong KE (2006) Endoscopic necrosectomy as primary therapy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis. Endoscopy 38:925–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Voermans RP, Veldkamp MC, Rauws EA, Bruno MJ, Fockens P (2007) Endoscopic transmural debridement of symptomatic organized pancreatic necrosis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 66:909–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Papachristou G, Takahashi N, Chahal P, Sarr MG, Baron TH (2007) Peroral endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Ann Surg 245:943–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryou M, Fong DG, Pai RD, Tavakkolizadeh A, Rattner DW, Thompson CC (2007) Dual-port distal pancreatectomy using a prototype endoscope and endoscopic stapler: a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) survival study in a porcine model. Endoscopy 39:881–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunkin BJ, Wilson E, Yu S, Sherman V, Herrera P, Silverman E (2008) The first human abdominal surgery in prone position: an example of how NOTES can be used to perform unique procedures. SAGES Video Abstract 2008, Final Program 137

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by 2008 Natural Orifice Surgery Consortium for Assessment and Research (NOSCAR™) STORZ Research Award.

Disclosures

Drs. Moran, Bingener, Murad, and Levy have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Dr. Gostout and the Developmental Endoscopy Unit receive a yearly grant from Olympus America and Olympus Tokyo. Dr. Gostout is an advisor to Apollo Endosurgery; both he and the Mayo Foundation maintain an equity position in Apollo Endosurgery, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. J. Gostout.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moran, E.A., Bingener, J., Murad, F. et al. The challenges with NOTES retroperitoneal access in humans. Surg Endosc 25, 1096–1100 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1323-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1323-4

Keywords

Navigation