Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in diabetic patients and postoperative outcome

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of complications after abdominal surgery. We evaluated retrospectively the impact of preoperative risk factors and outcome of diabetic patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) compared with open cholecystectomy (OC) for symptomatic gallstones.

Methods

Altogether 2,548 consecutive patients (1,581 LC, 967 OC) with symptomatic gallstones underwent cholecystectomy at our secondary referral center, being the only operative unit in the catchment area. Between the years 1995 and 2008, we operated 227 (9%) patients with diabetes, of whom 45 (20%) had type 1 diabetes. Preoperative data and operative outcome of the diabetic patients undergoing LC (n = 102) and OC (n = 125) were compared. The effect of comorbidities of diabetes on the risk for postoperative complications was analyzed by multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

The percentage of morbidly obese diabetic patients did not change during the study period. Almost half of the cholecystectomies (n = 111) in diabetics were performed as acute surgery due to cholecystitis. Conversion to open surgery was required in 16% of the diabetic patients undergoing LC compared with 7% in the nondiabetic controls (p < 0.0001). Mortality rate was zero and nine patients (7.2%), respectively, in the LC and OC groups (p < 0.01). Other complications were also more frequently observed in the OC than LC groups. This outcome difference was unchanged during time. On multivariate analysis, comorbidities of diabetes were associated with an elevated risk for complications, but obesity or acute surgery was not independently associated with postoperative complications.

Conclusions

When feasible, LC was a safe procedure in diabetes. Open surgery with comorbidities increased the operative risks. Our study was not randomized, and therefore selection bias to type of procedure may affect the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell DSH, Allbright E (2007) The multifaceted associations of hepatobiliary disease and diabetes. Endocrine Practice 13:300–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chapman BA, Wilson IR, Frampton CM (1996) Prevalence of gallbladder disease in diabetes mellitus. Dig Dis Sci 41:2222–2228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pagliarulo M, Fornari F, Fraquelli M (2004) Gallstone disease and related risk factors in a large cohort of diabetic patients. Dig Liver Dis 36:130–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Walsh DC, Eckhauser FE, Ramsburgh SR, Burney RB (1982) Risk associated with diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing gallbladder surgery. Surgery 91:254–257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sandler RS, Maule WF, Baltus ME (1986) Factors associated with postoperative complications in diabetes after biliary tract surgery. Gastroenterology 91:157–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carbonell AM, Lincourt AE, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Cobb WS, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2005) Do patient or hospital demographics predict cholecystectomy outcomes? A nationwide study of 93,578 patients. Surg Endosc 19:767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenmuller M, Haapamaki MM, Nordin P, Stenlund H, Nilsson E (2007) Cholecystectomy in Sweden 2000–2003: a nationwide study on procedures, patient characteristics, and mortality. BMC Gastroenterol 17:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bedirli A, Sözuer EM, Yuksel O, Yilmaz Z (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones in diabetic patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 11:281–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Noel RA, Patterson RE, Braun DK, Bloomgren GL (2009) Increased risk of acute pancreatitis and biliary disease observed in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32:834–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harjutsalo V, Sjöberg L, Tuomilehto J (2008) Time trends in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in Finnish children: a cohort study. Lancet 371:1777–1782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu G, Lindström J, Jousilahti P (2008) The increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome among Finnish men and women over a decade. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:832–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shpitz B, Sigal A, Kaufman Z, Dinbar A (1995) Acute cholecystitis in diabetic patients. Am Surg 61:964–967

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patiño JF, Quintero GA (1998) Asymptomatic cholelithiasis revisited. World J Surg 22:1119–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meshikhes AW (2002) Asymptomatic gallstones in the laparoscopic era. J R Coll Surg Edinb 47:742–748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan MH, Howard TJ, Fogel EL (2007) Frequency of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy detected by ERCP: experience at a large tertiary referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 65:247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aslar AK, Ertan T, Oguz H, Gocmen E, Koc M (2003) Impact of laparoscopy on frequency of surgery for treatment of gallstones. Surg Laparosc Endosc 13:315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vollmer CM, Callery MP (2007) Biliary injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: why still a problem? Gastroenterology 133:1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ibrahim S, Hean TK, Ho LS (2006) Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 30:1698–1704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pavlidis TE, Marakis GN, Ballas K (2007) Risk factors influencing conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 17:414–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simopoulos C, Polychronidis A, Botaitis S, Perente S, Pitiakoudis M (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients. Obes Surg 15:243–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lipman JM, Claridge JA, Haridas M (2007) Preoperative findings predict conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Surgery 142:556–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Katsika D, Grjibovski A, Einarsson C (2005) Genetic and environmental influences on symptomatic gallstone disease: a Swedish twin study. Hepatology 41:1138–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tuveri M, Borsezio V, Calo PG (2009) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the obese: results with the traditional and fundus-first technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19(6):735–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim W, Song KY, Lee HJ, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Cho GS (2008) The impact of co-morbidity on surgical outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of multicenter results. Ann Surg 248:793–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fernandez AZ Jr, DeMaria EJ, Tichansky DS, Kellum JM, Wolfe LG, Meador J, Sugerman HJ (2004) Experience with over 3,000 open and laparoscopic bariatric procedures: multivariate analysis of factors related to leak and resultant mortality. Surg Endosc 18:193–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Authors Hannu Paajanen, Satu Suuronen, Pia Nordström, Pekka Miettinen, and Leo Niskanen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannu Paajanen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paajanen, H., Suuronen, S., Nordstrom, P. et al. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in diabetic patients and postoperative outcome. Surg Endosc 25, 764–770 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1248-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1248-y

Keywords

Navigation