Abstract
Background
In nephron-sparing surgery, the closure of the renal remnant is one of the major critical steps in preventing possible complications. Several suture techniques can be used for this purpose. The type of suture used depends on the discretion of the surgeon and not on validated experimental data.
Methods
In an experimental setting, the renal remnant of a standardized defect in 20 porcine kidneys (with and without an intact renal capsule) was reconstructed using three different suture techniques (simple, vertical, and horizontal mattress suture). The maximum tensile force before the suture tears through the renal remnant was recorded.
Results
The horizontal mattress suture attains the highest maximum tensile force by far. The values of the simple and vertical mattress sutures are surpassed, with a respective increase of 140 and 83% if the capsule is intact and 172 and 109% if the capsule is not intact. If an intact renal capsule is present, the maximum tensile force in each suture technique increases 43–63%.
Conclusions
The data suggest that of all tested suture techniques, the horizontal mattress suture provides the best adaptation strength before the suture tears through the renal parenchyma/capsule. Furthermore, it is recommended that the kidney capsule be included in the reconstructive suture because this significantly contributes to the safety of the procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Uzzo RG, Novick AC (2001) Nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Urol 1:6–18
Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, Murphy DP, Sung GT, Novick AC (2002) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol 2(Pt. 1):469–476 (discussion 475–476)
Zincke H, Ruckle HC (1995) Use of exogenous material to bolster closure of the parenchymal defect following partial nephrectomy. Urology 1:96–98
Janetschek G (2007) Radical and partial nephrectomy for RCC: laparoscopy or open surgery. Urologe A 5:496–503
Mulholland TL, See WA (1998) Pledgeted sutures for parenchymal compression facilitate partial nephrectomy. Br J Urol 4:630–633
Wandschneider G (1968) A contribution on the suture technic in partial kidney resections. Zentralbl Chir 32:1102–1106
Snedeker JG, Barbezat M, Niederer P, Schmidlin FR, Farshad M (2005) Strain energy density as a rupture criterion for the kidney: impact tests on porcine organs, finite element simulation, and a baseline comparison between human and porcine tissues. J Biomech 5:993–1001
Snedeker JG, Niederer P, Schmidlin FR, Farshad M, Demetropoulos CK, Lee JB, Yang KH (2005) Strain-rate-dependent material properties of the porcine and human kidney capsule. J Biomech 5:1011–1021
Mabjeesh NJ, Avidor Y, Matzkin H (2004) Emerging nephron-sparing treatments for kidney tumors: a continuum of modalities from energy ablation to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2(Pt 1):553–560
Hafez KS, Fergany AF, Novick AC (1999) Nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence, and TNM staging. J Urol 6:1930–1933
Lerner SE, Hawkins CA, Blute ML, Grabner A, Wollan PC, Eickholt JT, Zincke H (1996) Disease outcome in patients with low-stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron-sparing or radical surgery. J Urol 6:1868–1873
Lee CT, Katz J, Shi W, Thaler HT, Reuter VE, Russo P (2000) Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm or less in a contemporary cohort. J Urol 3:730–736
Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H (2004) Nephron-sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol 3:1066–1070
Lane BR, Gill IS (2007) 5-Year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 1:70–74 (discussion 74)
Permpongkosol S, Bagga HS, Romero FR, Sroka M, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR (2006) Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of pathological T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma: a 5-year survival rate. J Urol 5:1984–1988 discussion 1988–1989
Acknowledgment
We acknowledge the technical assistance of Mrs. Patrizia Horny during the mechanical testing.
Disclosures
J. Simon, F. Finter, A. Ignatius, M. Meilinger, and L. Dürselen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simon, J., Finter, F., Ignatius, A. et al. Maximum tensile force of different suture techniques in reconstruction of the renal remnant after nephron-sparing surgery. Surg Endosc 25, 503–507 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1201-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1201-0