Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictors of in-hospital length of stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: results of multivariate logistic regression analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To identify variables that predict in-hospital length of stay (LOS) after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR).

Methods

Univariate analysis of patient and intraoperative variables was conducted on an operating room database of LVHRs performed from April 2001 to April 2009. Analysis was performed using either chi-square or linear trend analysis, as appropriate. A multivariate logistic regression model was created manually, to determine independent variables that predict LOS. p Value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 221 patients, with mean age of 56 years (range 25–88 years) underwent LVHR, for a total of 121 incisional and 100 primary ventral hernias. Of patients, 40% had incarcerated hernias and 25% had complex hernias (defined as multiple points of weakness on the anterior abdominal wall). The overall conversion rate to open operation was 6%. Mean LOS was 1.54 days (range 0–22 days). Eighty-six patients (39%) were discharged on the day of the procedure. Variables associated with significantly longer LOS on univariate analysis were incisional hernia (p = 0.000009), mesh size (p = 0.00007), complex hernia (p = 0.00009), incarcerated hernia (p = 0.0004), patient age (p = 0.0006), need for lysis of adhesions (p = 0.001), and female gender (p = 0.01). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade >2, conversion to open procedure, and recurrent hernia were not associated with longer LOS. Four factors were independently associated with significant longer length of stay on multivariate logistic regression analysis (p < 0.05): mesh size (p = 0.00005), incarcerated hernia (p = 0.002), patient age (p = 0.018), and complex hernia (p = 0.035).

Conclusions

Mesh size, incarcerated hernia, patient age, and complex hernia predict longer length of stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lomanto S, Iyer G, Shabbir A, Cheah WK (2006) Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 20:1030–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10-year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72:70–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis RT, Wiegand FM (1989) Natural history of vertical abdominal parietal closure: prolene versus dexon. Can J Surg 32:196–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoer J, Lawong G, Klinge (2002) Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia: a retrospective study of 2983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chrirug 73:474–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. National Center for Health Statistics (2007) Combined surgery data (NHDS and NSAS) data highlights. Available at http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk

  6. Sajid M, Bokhar S, Mallick A, Cheek E, Baig MK (2009) Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg 197:64–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83(5):1045–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(1):39–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramshaw BJ, Estaria P, Schwab J, Mason EM, Wilson RA, Duncan TD, Miller J, Lucas GW, Promes J (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy. Am Surg 65:827–831

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holzman MD, Purut CM, Reintgen K, Pappa TN (1997) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 11:32–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ballem N, Parikh R, Berber E, Siperstein A (2008) Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repairs: 5 year recurrence rates. Surg Endosc 22:1935–1940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96:851–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Perrone JM, Soper NJ, Eagon JC, Klingensmith ME, Aft RL, Frisella MM, Brunt LM (2005) Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic and ventral hernia repair. Surgery 138(4):708–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoppa RE (1989) The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg 13:545–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rives J, Pire JC, Flament JB, Palot JP, Body C (1985) Treatment of large eventrations. New therapeutic indications apropos of 322 cases. Chirurgie 111:215–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wantz GE (1991) Incisional hernioplasty with mersilene. Surg Gynecol Obstet 172:129–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koehler RH, Voeller G (1999) Recurrences in laparoscopic incisional hernia repairs. A personal series and review of the literature. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 133:378–382

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruininckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. White TJ, Santos MC, Thompson JS (1998) Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias. Am Surg 64:276–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Raftopoulos I, Vanuno D, Khorsand J, Ninos J, Kouraklis G, Lasky P (2002) Outcome of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in correlation with obesity, type of hernia, and hernia size. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 12(6):425–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah RH, Sharma A, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M, Chowbey PK (2009) Laparoscopic repair of incarcerated ventral abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 12(5):457–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saber A, Elgamal M, Mancl T, Norman E, Boros M (2008) Advanced age: Is it an indication or contraindication for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair? JSLS 12:46–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tessier DJ, Swain JM, Harold KL (2006) Safety of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in older adults. Hernia 10:53–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Townsend (2007) Sabiston textbook of surgery. Chapter 44: Ventral hernias, 18th edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia

  25. Read RC, Yoder G (1989) Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg 124:485–488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bendavid R (2001) Abdominal wall hernias: principles and management. Chapter 88: Epidemiology of hernias in the female. Springer, New York, p 617

Download references

Disclosures

Authors Ashwin Kurian, Sidhbh Gallagher, Abhiman Cheeyandira, and Robert Josloff have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Josloff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurian, A., Gallagher, S., Cheeyandira, A. et al. Predictors of in-hospital length of stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: results of multivariate logistic regression analysis. Surg Endosc 24, 2789–2792 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1048-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1048-4

Keywords

Navigation