Abstract
Purpose
This study was designed to investigate the safety of laparoscopic (Lap) colorectal surgery as reflected by the anastomotic bowel leak (ABL) rate compared with that seen in open surgery.
Methods
Between 2000 and 2007, 1,516 consecutive patients undergoing Lap-colorectal surgery with bowel anastomosis were covariate-adjusted to 3,258 patients undergoing open surgery by pathology and site of anastomosis using the institutional review board-approved laparoscopic, diverticular, Crohn’s, and colorectal cancer databases. Of these patients, 643 patients in each group were equally matched by pathology, site of anastomosis, date of surgery, age, gender, and body mass index. The clinical ABL rate was compared between the two groups by the location of bowel anastomosis and year of surgery.
Results
A total of 4,774 patients (1,516 Lap, 3,258 open; mean age, 55.8 ± 17.4 years; body mass index, 27.8 ± 6.2) underwent colorectal resection with bowel anastomosis (cancer 45.3%, Crohn’s 29.6%, diverticulitis 12.3%, other 12.8%). There was no difference in the overall clinical ABL between Lap (2.6%) and open procedures (2.1%; p = 0.5), between Lap right versus open right (p = 0.6), between Lap left versus open left (p = 0.8), and between patients operated on during different time periods (p = 0.4). For the case-matched 643 patients, there were no differences in clinical anastomotic bowel leak between laparoscopic versus open group based on site of anastomosis, pathology, and year of surgery.
Conclusions
A laparoscopic colorectal approach is not associated with a higher risk of clinical anastomotic bowel leak.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484
Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ (2006) Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 8(8):626–636
Chambers WM, Mortensen NJ (2004) Postoperative leakage and abscess formation after colorectal surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:865–880
Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG (2001) Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1157–1168
Platell C, Barwood N, Dorfmann G, Makin G (2007) The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 9:71–79
Sorensen LT, Jorgensen T, Kirkeby LT, Skovdal J, Vennits B, Wille-Jorgensen P (1999) Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 86:927–931
Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26:499–502
Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR, Merrie AE (2006) Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk. ANZ J Surg 76:579–585
Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725
Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, Chen JS, Chen HH, Chiang JM, Tang R (2005) Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients. Ann Surg 241:9–13
Chapman AE, Levitt MD, Hewett P, Woods R, Sheiner H, Maddern GJ (2001) Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies: a systematic review. Ann Surg 234(5):590–606
Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, Dellabona P, Di Carlo V (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236(6):759–766
The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059
Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H (2006) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg 202(5):439–444
Kanellos I, Blouhos K, Demetriades H, Pramateftakis MG, Mantzoros I, Zacharakis E, Betsis D (2004) The failed intraperitoneal colon anastomosis after colon resection. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 1):s53–s55
Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu R, Stein HD (1997) A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomosis. J Am Coll Surg 184:364–372
Isbister WH (2001) Anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a single surgeon’s experience. ANZ J Surg 71(9):516–521
Hyman NH, Osler T, Cataldo P, Burns EH, Shackford SR (2009) Anastomotic leaks after bowel resection: what does peer review teach us about the relationship to postoperative mortality? J Am Coll Surg 208(1):48–52
Hwang JM, Varma MG (2008) Surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 14(17):2678–2690
Disclosures
Drs. Galal El-Gazzaz, Tracy Hull, and Daniel Geisler have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El-Gazzaz, G., Geisler, D. & Hull, T. Risk of clinical leak after laparoscopic versus open bowel anastomosis. Surg Endosc 24, 1898–1903 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0867-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0867-7