Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Standardization and time trends in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

  • Letter
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev 34:498–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roukos DH (2009) Personalized cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 9:227–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roukos DH (2009) Personal genomics and genome-wide association studies: novel discoveries but limitations for practical personalized medicine. Ann Surg Oncol 16:772–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M, Pozzi S, Faso FL, Ravizza D, Zampino G, Sonzogni A, Biffi R (2009) Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1274–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roukos DH (2009) Mea culpa with cancer-targeted therapy: new thinking and new agents design for novel, causal networks-based, personalized biomedicine. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 9:217–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roukos DH (2009) Genome-wide association studies: how predictable is a person’s cancer risk? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9:389–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roukos DH (2009) Twenty-one-gene assay: challenges and promises in translating personal genomics and whole-genome scans into personalized treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:1337–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roukos DH, Ziogas D (2009) Human genetic and structural genomic variation: would genome-wide association studies be the solution for cancer complexity like Alexander the Great for the “Gordian Knot”? Ann Surg Oncol 16:774–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim SB, Choi HS, Jeong SY, Park JG (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic techniques as the surgical approach of choice for primary colorectal cancer: an analysis of 570 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 22:2588–2595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roukos DH (2009) Radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360:1362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roukos DH, Paraschou P, Lorenz M (2000) Distal gastric cancer and extensive surgery: a new evaluation method based on the study of the status of residual lymph nodes after limited surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 7:719–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roukos DH, Kappas AM (2002) Targeting the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 81:59–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fatouros M, Baltoyiannis G, Roukos DH (2008) The predominant role of surgery in the prevention and new trends in the surgical treatment of women with BRCA1/2 mutations. Ann Surg Oncol 15:21–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liakakos T, Roukos DH (2008) More controversy than ever: challenges and promises towards personalized treatment of gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:956–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roukos DH, Kappas AM, Agnantis NJ (2003) Perspectives and risks of breast conservation therapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10:718–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fatouros M, Roukos DH, Arampatzis I, Sotiriadis A, Paraskevaidis E, Kappas AM (2005) Factors increasing local recurrence in breast-conserving surgery. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 5:737–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kappas AM, Fatouros M, Roukos DH (2004) Is it time to change surgical strategy for gastric cancer in the United States? Ann Surg Oncol 11:727–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kappas AM, Roukos DH (2002) Quality of surgery determinant for the outcome of patient with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 9:828–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roukos DH (2008) Genetics and genome-wide association studies: surgery-guided algorithm and promise for future breast cancer personalized surgery. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 8:587–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziogas D, Baltogiannis G, Fatouros M, Roukos DH (2008) Identifying and preventing high-risk gastric cancer individuals with CDH1 mutations. Ann Surg 247:714–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roukos DH (2008) Linking contralateral breast cancer with genetics. Radiother Oncol 86:139–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ziogas D, Roukos DH (2009) Genetics and personal genomics for personalized breast cancer surgery: progressand challenges in research and clinical practice. Ann Surg Oncol 16(7):1771–1782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Agnantis NJ, Paraskevaidis E, Roukos D (2004) Preventing breast, ovarian cancer in BRCA carriers: rational of prophylactic surgery and promises of surveillance. Ann Surg Oncol 11:1030–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roukos DH, Lykoudis E, Liakakos T (2008) Genomics and challenges toward personalized breast cancer local control. J Clin Oncol 26:4360–4361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roukos DH (2008) HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 358:197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roukos DH (2008) Breast-cancer stromal cells with TP53 mutations. N Engl J Med 358:1636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Roukos DH (2009) Assessing both genetic variation (SNPs/CNVs) and gene–environment interactions may lead to personalized gastric cancer prevention. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 9:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roukos DH (2009) Genome-wide association studies and aggressive surgery toward individualized prevention, and improved local control and overall survival for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:795–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Roukos DH (1998) Extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: when, for whom and why. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80(1):16–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Briasoulis E, Fatouros M, Roukos DH (2007) Level I evidence in support of perioperative chemotherapy for operable gastric cancer: sufficient for wide clinical use? Ann Surg Oncol 14:2691–2695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Briasoulis E, Liakakos T, Dova L, Fatouros M, Tsekeris P, Roukos DH, Kappas AM (2006) Selecting a specific pre- or postoperative adjuvant therapy for individual patients with operable gastric cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 6:931–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roukos DH, Hottenrott C, Encke A, Baltogiannis G, Casioumis D (1994) Primary gastric lymphomas: a clinicopathologic study with literature review. Surg Oncol 3(2):115–125

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roukos DH (2004) Early-stage gastric cancer: a highly treatable disease. Ann Surg Oncol 11:127–129

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roukos DH, Kappas AM, Tsianos E (2002) Role of surgery in the prophylaxis of hereditary cancer syndromes. Ann Surg Oncol 9(7):607–609

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roukos DH, Agnanti NJ, Paraskevaidis E, Kappas AM (2002) Approaching the dilemma between prophylactic bilateral mastectomy or oophorectomy for breast and ovarian cancer prevention in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Ann Surg Oncol 9(10):941–943

    Google Scholar 

  36. Roukos DH (2009) Breast cancer outcomes: the crucial role of the breast surgeon in the era of personal genetics and systems biology. Ann Surg 249(6):1067–1068

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Kanellos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kanellos, D., Pramateftakis, M.G. & Kanellos, I. Standardization and time trends in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 24, 726–727 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0612-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0612-2

Keywords

Navigation