Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Framing family conversation after early diagnosis of iatrogenic injury and incidental findings

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgeons are rarely formally trained in giving bad news to patients. The aim of our study was to examine and compare techniques of disclosure of iatrogenic and incidental operative findings among surgical residents.

Methods

General surgery residents performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the SurgicalSIM device in a mock operating room. Half (n = 8) were presented with a common bile duct injury, and half (n = 7) encountered metastatic gallbladder cancer during the operation. Both groups disclosed this information to a patient’s scripted family member and completed a questionnaire. All encounters were videotaped and independently rated using a modified SPIKES protocol, a validated tool for delivering bad news. We compared disclosure of iatrogenic versus unexpected findings by year of training. Analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney test.

Results

Regardless of the year of training, more residents were comfortable with disclosure of an incidental finding than disclosure of an iatrogenic injury (47 vs. 33%). Senior residents (PGY4-PGY5) had better ratings by SPIKES (p < 0.05), most notably for tailoring disclosure to what patient and family understand, exploring patient and family expectations, and offering to answer any questions (p < 0.05). Even though all residents felt more comfortable with disclosure of an incidental finding, the quality of the disclosure by SPIKES score was the same for iatrogenic and incidental operative findings (p = NS).

Conclusion

In general, trainees are ill prepared for delivering bad news. Disclosure of iatrogenic injuries was more challenging compared to that of incidental findings. Senior residents do better than junior residents at delivering bad news.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lazare A (2006) Apology in medical practice: an emerging clinical skill. JAMA 296(11):1401–1404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallagher TH, Studdert D, Levinson W (2007) Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients. N Engl J Med 356(26):2713–2719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kowalczyk L (2007) Doctors say they need protection to apologize. The Boston Globe, October 31

  4. Gallagher TH, Levinson W (2005) Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients: a time for professional action. Arch Intern Med 165(16):1819–1824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang L, Petros J, Hess DT, Rotondi C, Babineau TJ (2007) Integrating simulation into a surgical residency program: is voluntary participation effective? Surg Endosc 21(3):418–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Park J, MacRae H, Musselman LJ, Rossos P, Hamstra SJ, Wolman S, Reznick RK (2007) Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality simulator training: transfer to live patients. Am J Surg 194(2):205–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Passman MA, Fleser PS, Dattilo JB, Guzman RJ, Naslund TC (2007) Should simulator-based endovascular training be integrated into general surgery residency programs? Am J Surg 194(2):212–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunkin B, Adrales GL, Apelgren K, Mellinger JD (2007) Surgical simulation: a current review. Surg Endosc 21(3):357–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Powers KA, Rehrig ST, Irias N, Albano HA, Malinow A, Jones SB, Moorman DW, Pawlowski JB, Jones DB (2007) Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: an approach to enhance the surgical team performance. Surg Endosc 22(4):885–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP (2000) SPIKES—a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 5(4):302–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Medical Education Technologies, Inc. (2008) Available at http://www.meti.com/products_ss_lts.htm. Accessed January 20, 2008

  12. Afdhal N (2008) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  13. Karvonen J, Gullichsen R, Laine S, Salminen P, Gronroos JM (2007) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: primary and long-term results from a single institution. Surg Endosc 21(7):1069–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shih SP, Schulick RD, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Choti MA, Campbell KA, Yeo CJ, Talamini MA (2007) Gallbladder cancer: the role of laparoscopy and radical resection. Ann Surg 245(6):893–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hutul OA, Carpenter RO, Tarpley JL, Lomis KD (2006) Missed opportunities: a descriptive assessment of teaching and attitudes regarding communication skills in a surgical residency. Curr Surg 63(6):401–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rider EA, Hinrichs MM, Lown BA (2006) A model for communication skills assessment across the undergraduate curriculum. Med Teach 28(5):e127–e134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aon Corporation (2008) Available at http://www.aon.com/risk_management/default.jsp. Accessed January 21, 2008

  18. Kraman SS, Hamm G (1999) Risk management: extreme honesty may be the best policy. Ann Intern Med 131(12):963–967

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Garbutt JM, Kapp JM, Chan DK, Dunagan WC, Fraser VJ, Levinson W (2006) US and Canadian physicians’ attitudes and experiences regarding disclosing errors to patients. Arch Intern Med 166(15):1605–1611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. The National Quality Forum safe practices leap. The Leapfrog Group, 2007. Available at http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/Leapfrog-National_Quality_Forum_Safe_Practices_Leap.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2008

  21. Health care at the crossroads: strategies for improving the medical liability system and preventing patient injury. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 2005. Available at http://www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/3F1B626C-CB65-468B-A871-488D1DA66B06/0/medical_liability_exec_summary.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2008

  22. Hospital Accreditation Standards (2007) The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, IL

  23. Clinton HR, Obama B (2006) Making patient safety the centerpiece of medical liability reform. N Engl J Med 354(21):2205–2208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wojcieszak D, Banja J, Houk C (2006) The Sorry Works! Coalition: making the case for full disclosure. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 32(6):344–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. National Quality Forum Updates Endorsement of Serious Reportable Events in Healthcare. October 16, 2006. Available at http://www.qualityforum.org/pdf/news/prSeriousReportableEvents10-15-06.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2008

  26. Lamb RM, Studdert DM, Bohmer RM, Berwick DM, Brennan TA (2003) Hospital disclosure practices: results of a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood) 22(2):73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Shannon G. Fischer for her invaluable help with the editing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Limaris Barrios, Shawn Tsuda, Alexandre Derevianko, Sheilla Barnett, Donald Moorman & Daniel B. Jones

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA

    Caroline L. Cao

  3. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA

    Alexandros N. Karavas

  4. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Daniel B. Jones

Authors
  1. Limaris Barrios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shawn Tsuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexandre Derevianko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sheilla Barnett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Donald Moorman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Caroline L. Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alexandros N. Karavas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Daniel B. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel B. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrios, L., Tsuda, S., Derevianko, A. et al. Framing family conversation after early diagnosis of iatrogenic injury and incidental findings. Surg Endosc 23, 2535–2542 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0450-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0450-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation