Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Primary access-related complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the closed technique: experience of a single surgical team over more than 15 years

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), a common laparoscopic procedure, is a relatively safe invasive procedure, but complications can occur at every step, starting from creation of the pneumoperitoneum. Several studies have investigated procedure-related complications, but the primary access- or trocar-related complications generally are underreported, and their true incidence may be higher than studies show. Major vascular or visceral injury resulting from blind access to the abdominal cavity, although rare, has been reported. Of the two methods for creating pneumoperitoneum, the open access technique is reported to have the lower incidence of these injuries. The authors report their experience with the closed method and show that if performed with proper technique, it can be as rapid and safe as other techniques. However, injuries still happen, and the search for the predisposing factors must be continued.

Methods

Between January 1992 and December 2007, a retrospective study examined 15,260 cases of LC performed for symptomatic gallstone disease in the authors’ institution by a single team of surgeons. The primary access-related injuries in these cases were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

In 15,260 cases of LC, 63 cases of primary access-related complications were identified, for an overall incidence of 0.41%. Major injuries in 11 cases included major vascular and visceral injuries, and minor injuries in 52 cases included omental and subcutaneous emphysema. For the closed method, the findings showed an overall incidence of 0.14% for primary access-related vascular injuries and 0.07% for visceral injuries.

Conclusion

Primary access-related complications during LC are common and can prove to be fatal if not identified early. The incidence of these injuries with closed methods is no greater than with open methods. No evidence suggests abandonment of the closed-entry method in laparoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the new “gold standard”? Arch Surg 127:917–923

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A, Wallin G et al (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single blinded study. Ann Surg 234:741–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ishizaki Y, Miwa K, Yoshinmoto J, Sugo H, Sawasaki S (2006) Conversion of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy between 1993 and 2004. Br J Surg 93:987–991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Russel JC, Walsh SJ, Mattie AS, Lynch JT (1996) Bile duct injuries, 1989–1993: a statewide experience: connecticut laparoscopic cholecystectomy registry. Arch Surg 131:382–388

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hanney RM, Bond G, de Costa A (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the missed diagnosis. Aust N Z J Surg 67:166–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S, Sen B (2008) Iatrogenic biliary injury: 13, 305 cholecystectomies experienced by a single surgical team over more than 13 years. Surg Endosc 22:1077–1086

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hashizume M, Sugimachi K (1997) Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Surg Endosc 11:1198–1201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mac CC, Lecuru F, Rizk E, Robin F, Boucaya V, Taurelle R (1999) Morbidity in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: results of a prospective single-centre study. Surg Endosc 13:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Champault G, Cazacu F, Taffinder N (1996) Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103, 852 operations. Surg Endosc 6:367–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ, Jamieson GG, Brown AR, Kolbe A (2003) Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 90:668–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonjer HJ, Hazebrek EJ, Kazemier G, Giuffrida MC, Meijer WS, Lange JF (1997) Open vs closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 84:599–602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen FW, Kolkman W, de Bakkum EA, Kroon CD, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Trimbos JB (2004) Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:634–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoonderwoerd L, Swark DJ (2005) The role of optical access trocars in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Technol Int 14:61–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E (2001) Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum: a multicentre study on 12, 919 cases. Surg Endosc 15:566–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McKernan JB, Finley CR (2002) Experience with optical trocar in performing laparoscopic procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:96–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Hernmans J, Trimbos JB (1997) Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynecol 104:595–600

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Larobina M, Nottle P (2005) Complete evidence regarding major vascular injuries during laparoscopic access. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 15:119–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hasson HM (1999) Open laparoscopy as a method of access in laparoscopic surgery. Gynaecol Endosc 8:353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scharl A, Costa SD, Duell N, Gohring UJ, Gaetje R (2005) Suspicion for intraabdominal adhesions: is open laparoscopy the gold standard? Zentralbl Gynakol 127:380–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaloo P, Cooper M, Molloy D (2002) A survey of entry techniques and complications of members of the Australian Gynaecological Endoscopy Society. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42:264–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Palmer R (1974) Safety in laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 13:1–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vintila D, Moldovano R, Bradea C, Filip V, Neacsu CN, Vlad N (2005) Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. Directory Open Access J 1:53–56

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moberg AC, Montgomery A (2005) Primary access-related complications with laparoscopy: comparison of blind and open techniques. Surg Endosc 19:1196–1199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuller J, Ashar BS, Carry-Corrado J (2005) Trocar-associated injuries and fatalities: an analysis of 1, 399 reports to the FDA. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:302–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yuzpe AA (1990) Pneumoperitoneum needle and trocar injuries in laparoscopy: a survey on possible contributing factors and prevention. J Reprod Med 35:485–490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schafer M, Lauper M, Krahenbuhl L (2001) Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 15:275–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Corson SL, Chandler JG, Way LW (2001) Survey of laparoscopic entry injuries provoking litigation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:341–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chandler JG, Corson SL, Way LW (2001) Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries. J Am Coll Surg 192:478–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Malik AM, Laghari AA, Mallah Q, Hashmi F, Sheikh U, Hussain Talpur KA (2008) Extrabiliary complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how serious is the problem? J Min Access Surg 4:5–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hurd WW, Pearl ML, Delancy JO, Quint EH, Garnett B, Bude RO (1993) Laparoscopic injury of abdominal wall blood vessels: a report of three cases. Obstet Gynecol 82:673–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Usal H, Sayad P, Hayek N, Hallak A, Huie F, Ferzli G (1998) Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an institutional review of experience with 2,589 procedures and literature review. Surg Endosc 12:960–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshire E, De-Diego CJ, Fernandez-Represa JA (1997) Risks of the minimal approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg 21:529–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rafii A, Camatte S, Lelievre L (2005) Previous abdominal surgery and closed entry for gynaecological laparoscopy: a prospective study. BJOG 112:100–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Minimal Access Surgery, ILS Multispeciality Clinic, DD-6, Sector-I, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, 700 064, India

    Prakash Kumar Sasmal, Om Tantia, Mayank Jain, Shashi Khanna & Bimalendu Sen

Authors
  1. Prakash Kumar Sasmal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Om Tantia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mayank Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shashi Khanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bimalendu Sen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Om Tantia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sasmal, P.K., Tantia, O., Jain, M. et al. Primary access-related complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the closed technique: experience of a single surgical team over more than 15 years. Surg Endosc 23, 2407–2415 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0437-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0437-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation