Skip to main content
Log in

Using a dynamic training environment to acquire laparoscopic surgery skill

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Current physical laparoscopic surgical simulators provide training only for static tasks, which do not develop the more advanced hand–eye coordination skills needed to navigate the dynamic surgical environment. A novel dynamic minimally invasive training environment (DynaMITE) was developed to address this need. This study aimed to evaluate further the utility of the system as a training and skill assessment tool. Two studies were performed with a second-generation design. The authors hypothesized that the dynamic task environment would be challenging to novices and would differentiate experienced surgeons from the inexperienced by emphasising the dynamic skills gained through surgical experience.

Methods

The participants in the first study were 42 novice and experienced surgeons attending the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2007 Learning Center, whereas the second controlled laboratory study had 16 participants (5 novices and 11 experienced surgeons). The participants performed two tasks: an aiming task and an object manipulation task. Both tasks were positioned on a dynamic platform that moved in five different trajectories.

Results

The subjective feedback from the surgeons at the SAGES Learning Center was positive. The results from the controlled study showed significant performance deterioration in the fast diagonal task compared with the task of aiming and manipulating in the static environment for both experience groups but no performance differences between the groups.

Conclusions

Dynamic tasks are challenging, and surgeons need to be trained specifically for these tasks. The DynaMITE system can provide training benefits for dynamic skill development, even for expert surgeons who may have had no opportunity to gain these skills through their surgical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soper NJ, Brunt LM, Derbl K (1994) Laparoscopic general surgery. N Engl J Med 330:409–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB (1996) Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:654–658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Targarona EM, Marco C, Balague C, Rodríguez J, Cugat E, Hoyuela C, Veloso E, Trias M (1998) How, when, and why bile duct injury occurs: a comparison between open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12:322–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimotsu RT, Cao CGL (2007) The effect of color-contrasting shadows on a dynamic 3-D laparoscopic surgical task. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics A 37:1047–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Picod G, Jambon AC, Vinatier D, Dubois P (2005) What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 19:95–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicolaou M, James A, Lo BP, Darzi A, Yang GZ (2005) Invisible shadow for navigation and planning in minimal invasive surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 8(Pt 2):25–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanna GB, Cresswell AB, Cuschieri A (2002) Shadow depth cues and endoscopic performance. Arch Surg 137:1166–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Andreatta PB, Woodrum DT, Birkmeyer JD, Yellamanchilli RK, Doherty GM, Gauger PG, Minter RM (2006) Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 243:854–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin H, Lonroth H (2002) The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 16:1324–1328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, Fleming JB, Rege RV, Laycock R, Bergen PC, Tesfay ST, Jones DB (2002) Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 16:406–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ali MR, Mowery Y, Kaplan B, DeMaria EJ (2002) Training the novice in laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 16:1732–1736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bell AK, Saide B, Johanas JT, Leisk GG, Cao CGL, Schwaitzberg SD (2007) Innovative Dynamic Minimally Invasive Training Environment (DynaMITE). Surg Innov 14:217–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt RA (1982) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign IL

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lordahl DS, Archer J (1958) Transfer effects on a rotary pursuit task as a function of first-task difficulty. J Exp Psychol 56:421–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the subjects for their valuable time in the studies and their feedback on the DynaMITE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. G. L. Cao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, A.K., Zhou, M., Schwaitzberg, S.D. et al. Using a dynamic training environment to acquire laparoscopic surgery skill. Surg Endosc 23, 2356–2363 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0346-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0346-1

Keywords

Navigation