Abstract
Background
This study aimed to determine whether the increasing emphasis on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) influences hiring practices within academic surgical departments.
Methods
A questionnaire was mailed to chairs of surgery departments and divisions of general surgery at the 16 Canadian academic institutions. Nonresponders were identified and contacted directly. The survey consisted of 34 questions, including Likert scales, single answers, and multiple-choice questions. Data were collected on demographics, perceptions of MIS, and recruitment/hiring. At the time of the survey, two department chair positions were vacant.
Results
A response rate of 87% (26/30) was obtained, with representation from 94% of departments (15/16). Of those surveyed, 88% intend to increase the importance of MIS at their institution within 5 years, and 87% intend to achieve this objective through new hirings. Networking (73%) and retention of recent graduates (89%) were cited most frequently as recruitment strategies. Strengthening the division, research, and education were considered important or extremely important by more than 90% of the respondents with respect to recruitment goals, whereas strengthening MIS was considered important or extremely important by 50%. Within 5 years, surgical departments intend to hire a median of four general surgeons, 50% of whom will have formal MIS training. In comparison, over the past 10 years, only 25% of new recruits had formal MIS training. More than 90% of the respondents considered formal MIS fellowship, MIS fellowship plus a second fellowship, and proctorship to be adequate training for performing advanced MIS, whereas traditional methods were considered inadequate. Lack of operative time and resource issues were considered most limiting in the hiring of new MIS surgeons.
Conclusion
Minimally invasive surgery is growing in importance within academic surgical departments, but it remains an intermediate recruitment priority. Formal MIS training appears to be important in the recruiting of new surgeons, whereas traditional training methods are considered inadequate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mühe E (1986) Die erste: cholecystecktomie durch das laparoskop (The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Langenbecks Arch Surg 369:804
Glasgow RE, Yee LF, Mulvihill SJ (1997) Laparoscopic splenectomy: the emerging standard. Surg Endosc 11:108–112
Smith CD, Weber CJ, Amerson JR (1999) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: new gold standard. World J Surg 23:389–396
Kuo PC, Johnson LB, Sitzmann JV (2000) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with a 23-hour stay: a new standard for transplantation surgery. Ann Surg 231:772–779
Salminen PT, Hiekkanen HI, Rantala AP, Ovaska JT (2007) Comparison of long-term outcome of laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study with an 11-year follow-up. Ann Surg 246:201–206
The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059
Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726
Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068
Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 246:385–392
Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Madhanjumar MV (2007) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 205:222–230
Poulin EC, Gagné JP, Boushey RP (2006) Advanced laparoscopic skills acquisition: the case of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 86:987–1004
Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) (1998) Integrating advanced laparoscopy into surgical residency training. Surg Endosc 12:374–376
Birch DW, Asiri AH, de Gara CJ (2007) The impact of a formal mentoring program for minimally invasive surgery on surgeon practice and patient outcomes. Am J Surg 193:589–591
Hutter MM, Kellogg KC, Ferguson CM, Abbott WM, Warshaw AL (2006) The impact of the 80-hour resident workweek on surgical residents and attending surgeons. Ann Surg 243:864–871
Chiasson PM, Pace DE, Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Poulin EC (2003) Minimally invasive surgery training in Canada: a survey of general surgery. Surg Endosc 17:371–377
Jamieson S (2004) Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Med Educ 38:1212–1218
Rattner DW, Apelgren KN, Eubanks WS (2001) The need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery: the residents’ perspective. Surg Endosc 15:1066–1070
Raymond E, Ternamian A, Leyland N, Tolomiczenko G (2006) Endoscopy teaching in Canada: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology program directors and graduating residents. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13:10–16
Duchene DA, Moinzadeh A, Gill IS, Clayman RV, Winfield HN (2006) Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery. J Urol 176:2158–2166
Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518–525
Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Eriksen JR, Blirup D, Kristiansen VB, Funch-Jensen P, Darzi A (2006) An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg 244:310–314
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Poster presentation at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting, Las Vegas, NV, 18–22 April 2007.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martel, G., Poulin, É.C., Mamazza, J. et al. Laparoscopy influences hiring practices within academic surgical departments. Surg Endosc 23, 341–346 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9934-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9934-8