Skip to main content
Log in

Lifting of the umbilicus for the installation of pneumoperitoneum with the Veress needle increases the distance to the retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal structures

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In laparoscopy, 50% of all complications occur during establishment of the pneumoperitoneum. Elevation of the fascia is recommended for the Veress needle approach, although the benefit has not been proved to date. This study aimed to evaluate the intraabdominal changes during lifting of the fascia with regard to the distance from the fascia to the retroperitoneal vessels and the intestine for access in laparoscopy.

Methods

For 10 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the operation started with the computed tomography (CT) scan. After orotracheal intubation, a CT scan of the umbilical region was performed. After a supraumbilical incision, the fascia was freed and elevated with stay sutures. During maximal elevation, a second CT scan was performed. Distances to the intestinal (small bowel) and retroperitoneal structures (iliac artery, vena cava) were measured. Intraabdominal pressure was measured with a transcystic balloon manometer before (a) and after (b) elevation of the fascia, after insertion of the Veress needle (c), and after completion of the insufflations (d).

Results

Lifting of the fascia increased the distance between the fascia and the intestinal structures in the patients with no prior abdominal surgery (mean distance, 1.92 cm; range, 0.87–2.67 cm) and the distance between the fascia and the retroperitoneal vessels (mean distance, 7.83 cm; range, 3–11 cm). The median intraabdominal pressures in terms of cm H2O were 5.4 for a, 1.1 for b, 1.1 for c, and 12. 5 for d.

Conclusion

Elevation of the fascia before the first entrance to the abdominal cavity for laparoscopy may increase safety due to a significant enlargement of distance between the fascia and the retroperitoneal structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hasson HM (1971) A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 110(6):886–887

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Orlando R, Palatini P, Lirussi F (2003) Needle and trocar injuries in diagnostic laparoscopy under local anesthesia: what is the true incidence of these complications? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(3):181–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E, De-Diego Carmona JA, Fernandez-Represa JA (1997) Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg 21(5):529–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballem RV, Rudomanski J (1993) Techniques of pneumoperitoneum. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(1):42–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sigman HH, Fried GM, Garzon J, Hinchey EJ, Wexler MJ, Meakins JL, Barkun JS (1993) Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(4):296–299

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E (2001) Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum: a multicenter study on 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc 15(6):566–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmedt CG, Leibl BJ, Bittner R (2002) Access-related complications in laparoscopic surgery. Tips and tricks to avoid trocar complications. Chirurg 73(8):863–876, quiz 877–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Semm K (1995) Cutting versus conical tip designs. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 3(1):39–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonier HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi Ch, Janson FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16(7):1121–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ, Jamieson GG, Brown AR, Kolbe A (2003) Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 90(6):668–679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Zehetner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shamiyeh, A., Glaser, K., Kratochwill, H. et al. Lifting of the umbilicus for the installation of pneumoperitoneum with the Veress needle increases the distance to the retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal structures. Surg Endosc 23, 313–317 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9920-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9920-1

Keywords

Navigation