Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic total colectomy for colonic inertia: surgical and functional results

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Total colectomy is the surgery of choice for colonic inertia (CI) when medical treatment has failed. Laparoscopic total colectomy has demonstrated to be a feasible technique.

Objective

Present our experience in patients with CI who underwent laparoscopic total colectomy (TC) + ileorectoanastomosis (IRA) and evaluate the functional results and medium-term follow-up after this surgery.

Material and methods

All patients with CI were included in a prospective laparoscopic surgical protocol, from 2002 to 2007. These patients had a complete work-up for chronic constipation (clinical records, barium enema, colonic transit time, defecography, anorectal manometry, small bowel follow through). All patients were evaluated with Wexner’s score for constipation pre- and postoperatively, asked if they would recommend surgery to other patients, and if they were satisfied with the procedure (on a scale from 1 to 10). Statistical analysis was carried out using Student’s T-test.

Results

In this period 20 patients were operated with diagnosis of CI. All patients were females with an average age of 41.5 years (range 18–52 years). Mean operative time was 248 min (range 170–360 min). One (5%) patient was converted to open surgery. The medium time to flatus per anum and feeding was 2 (range 1–6) and 3 (range 2–6) days, respectively. The medium postoperative stay was 7 days. Seven patients (35%) presented surgical postoperative complications (three postoperative ileus, one portal thrombosis, one rectal hemorrhage, one anastomotic leakage, and one hemoperitoneum). There was no postoperative mortality. The average follow-up was 25 months (range 1–60 months). Preoperative Wexner’s constipation score was 22.3 (range 19–29 months) pre surgery and at the end of follow-up was 1.8 (range 0–6) (p < 0.01). The medium level of satisfaction was 8 (range 2–10) and only one patient would not recommend surgery to other patients.

Conclusion

The laparoscopic access is a safe technique with satisfactory functional results after medium-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Talley NJ, Zinsmeister AR, Van Dyke C, Melton LJ 3rd (1991) Epidemiology of colonic symptoms and the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 101:927–934

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Higgins PD, Johanson JF (2004) Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 99:750–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schouten WR, de Graaf EJ (1991) Severe, long-standing constipation in adults: indications for surgical treatment. Neth J Surg 43:222–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sonnenberg A, Koch TR (1989) Epidemiology of constipation in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 32:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pinedo G, López F, Soto G, Zúñiga A, Rahmer A, Miquel JF, Clavería M (2004) Resultados del tratamiento quirúrgico en inercia colónica. Rev Chil Cir 56:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fan CW, Wang JY (2000) Subtotal colectomy for colonic inertia. Int Surg 85:309–312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pikarsky AJ, Singh JJ, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2001) Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing colectomy for colonic inertia. Dis Colon Rectum 44:179–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eu KW, Lim SL, Seow-Choen F, Leong AF, Ho YH (1998) Clinical outcome and bowel function following total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in the Oriental population. Dis Colon Rectum 41:215–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sample C, Gupta R, Bamehriz F, Anvari M (2005) Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for colonic inertia. J Gastrointest Surg 9:803–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakamura T, Pikarsky AJ, Potenti FM, Lau CW, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2001) Are complications of subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis related to the original disease? Am Surg 67:417–420

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Elton C, Makin G, Hitos K, Cohen CR (2003) Mortality, morbidity and functional outcome after ileorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg 90:59–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, Mehrabi A, Buchler MW (2004) Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 18:898–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. López F, Soto G, Zárate A, Pinedo G, Pérez G, Avendaño R, García-Huidobro I, Ibáñez L (2003) Protocolo de cirugía laparoscópica intestinal. Rev Chil Cir 55:225–231

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holte K, Kehlet H (2000) Postoperative ileus: a preventable event. Br J Surg 87:1480–1493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lane WA (1908) Results of the operative treatment of chronic constipation. BMJ 1:1126–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lundin E, Karlbom U, Palman L, Graf W (2002) Outcome of segmental colonic resection for slow-transit constipation. Br J Surg 89:1270–1274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. You YT, Wang JY, Changchien CR, Chen JS, Hsu KC, Tang R, Chiang JM, Chen HH (1998) Segmental colectomy in the management of colonic inertia. Am Surg 64:775–777

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Preston DM, Hawley PR, Lennard-Jones JE, Todd IP (1984) Results of colectomy for severe idiopathic constipation in women (Arbuthnot Lane’s disease). Br J Surg 71:547–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bernini A, Madoff RD, Lowry AC, Spencer MP, Gemlo BT, Jensen LL, Wong WD (1998) Should patients with combined colonic inertia and nonrelaxing pelvic floor undergo subtotal colectomy? Dis Colon Rectum 41:1363–1366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pemberton JH, Rath DM, Ilstrup DM (1991) Evaluation and surgical treatment of severe chronic constipation. Ann Surg 214:403–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Eu KW, Lim SL, Seow-Choen F, Leong AF, Ho YH (1998) Clinical outcome and bowel function following total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in the oriental population. Dis Colon Rectum 41:215–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Webster C, Dayton M (2002) Results after colectomy for colonic inertia: a sixteen-year experience. Am J Surg 186:639–644

    Google Scholar 

  25. Piccirillo MF, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1995) Colectomy as treatment for constipation in selected patients. Br J Surg 82:898–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Knowles CH, Scott M, Lunniss PJ (1999) Outcome of colectomy for slow transit constipation. Ann Surg 230:627–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Pinedo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinedo, G., Zarate, A.J., Garcia, E. et al. Laparoscopic total colectomy for colonic inertia: surgical and functional results. Surg Endosc 23, 62–65 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9901-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9901-4

Keywords

Navigation