Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Routine diagnostic laparoscopy reduces the rate of unnecessary appendicectomies in young women

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The reported negative appendicectomy rate for young women remains high. This high rate of unnecessary appendicectomies has morbidity and high cost. Consensus European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) guidelines have emphasised the value of routine laparoscopy as a diagnostic tool in young women. The objective of this study is to investigate the role of routine laparoscopy in the diagnosis of suspected appendicitis in young women.

Methods

The details of young female patients who have had an appendicectomy with or without laparoscopy between 1980 and 2005 were obtained. The histopathological reports pertaining to the episode of appendicectomy were manually searched. Three periods were identified for comparison. The first period was between 1980 and 1990 when diagnostic laparoscopy was not practised in the emergency setting. The second period was between 1991 and 1999 when diagnostic laparoscopy was used selectively. The third period was between 2000 and 2005 when diagnostic laparoscopy was used routinely to investigate female patients presenting with acute right iliac fossa pain.

Results

Selective laparoscopy reduced the rate of negative appendicectomy rate from 37% to 31% (ns). By contrast, routine laparoscopy reduced the negative appendicectomy rate to 5% (p < 0.005). Additionally, considering the ratios of all appendectomies to normal appendices, an average of one in three appendices excised was normal before the era of laparoscopy. The selective use of laparoscopy did not significantly alter this ratio (ns). By contrast routine use of laparoscopy has altered the ratio to 1 in 20 appendices removed to be normal (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In young females, diagnostic laparoscopy used selectively reduces the rate of negative appendicectomy but not significantly. However, when used routinely, laparoscopy significantly reduces the rate of negative appendicectomy. Diagnostic laparoscopy should be used routinely for all young females presenting with right iliac fossa pain sufficiently severe to warrant surgical exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang JY, Hoare J, Majeed A, Williamson RC, Maxwell JD (2003) Decline in admission rates for acute appendicitis in England. Br J Surg 90(12):1586–1592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Borgstein PJ, Gordijn RV, Eijsbouts QAJ, Cuesta MA (1997) Acute appendicitis—a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women. Surg Endosc 11:923–927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald GP, Pendarvis DP, Wilmoth R, Daley BJ (2001) Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy. Am Surg 67(11):1017–1021

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weyant MJ, Eachempati SR, Maluccio MA, Rivadeneira DE, Grobmyer SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS (2000) Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis. Surgery 128(2):145–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones PF (2001) Suspected acute appendicitis: trends in management over 30 years. Br J Surg 88(12):1570–1577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP (2001) Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 286(14):1748–1753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Korner H, Soreide JA, Pedersen EJ, Bru T, Sondenaa K, Vatten L (2001) Stability in incidence of acute appendicitis. A population-based longitudinal study. Dig Surg 18(1):61–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJ (1992) Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg 158:37–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang Fc, Hogle HH, Welling DR (1973) The fate of the negative appendix. Am J Surg 126:752–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flum DR, Koepsell T (2002) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis—Nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 137:799–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Dalen R, Bagshaw PF, Dobbs BR, Robertson GM, Lynch AC, Frizelle FA (2003) The utility of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women of reproductive age. Surg Endosc 17(8):1311–1313. Epub 2003 May 13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Larsson PG, Henriksson G, Olsson M, Boris J, Stroberg P, Tronstad SE, Skullman S (2001) Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study. Surg Endosc 15(2):200–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vander Velpen GC, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1994) Diagnostic yield and management benefit of laparoscopy: a prospective audit. Gut 35:1617–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bijnen CL, van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2003) Implications of removing a normal appendix. Dig Surg 20(3):215–219; discussion 220–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sauerland S, Agresta F, Bergamaschi R et al (2006) Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: Evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 20:14–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Slim K, Chipponi J (2006) Laparoscopy for every acute appendicitis? Letter to the Editor. Surg Endosc 20:1785–1786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sauerland S, Neugebauer E (2007) Laparoscopy for every acute appendicitis? The authors reply. Surg Endosc 21:342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jadallah A, Abdul-Ghani A, Tibblin S (1994) Diagnostic laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomy in fertile women. Eur J Surg 160:41–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy—is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women. Surg Endosc 11:95–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Olsen JB, Myren CJ, Haahr PE (1993) Randomised study of the value of laparoscopy before apppendicectomy. Br J Surg 80:922–923

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ (2004) Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 141:537–546

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersson RE (2004) Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg 91(1):28–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kane MG, Krejs GL (1984) Complications of diagnostic laparoscopy in Dallas. Gastrointest Endosc 30:237–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Puylaret JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI et al (1987) A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Eng J Med 317(11):666–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wong SK, Chan LP, Yeo A (2002) Helical CT imaging of clinically suspected appendicitis: correlation of CT and histological findings. Clin Radiol 57(8):741–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Perez J, Barone JE, Wilbanks TO, Jorgensson D, Corvo PR (2003) Liberal use of computed tomography scanning does not improve diagnostic accuracy in appendicitis. Am J Surg 185(3):194–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy

    S. Garbarino

  2. Department of Surgery and Molecular Oncology, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK

    S. M. Shimi

Authors
  1. S. Garbarino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. M. Shimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Shimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garbarino, S., Shimi, S.M. Routine diagnostic laparoscopy reduces the rate of unnecessary appendicectomies in young women. Surg Endosc 23, 527–533 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9855-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9855-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation