Abstract
Background
Reports of incidental gastrointestinal luminal wall thickening (IGILWT) on computed tomography (CT) in patients without gastrointestinal complaints are not rare. Currently there is no consensus about what to do in those cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of endoscopic study in asymptomatic patients with IGILWT.
Material and methods
Retrospective analysis of data obtained prospectively between September 2004 and March 2007 was carried out. Patients without gastrointestinal symptoms/signs with IGILWT and assessed by endoscopy were included. The endoscopic findings were classified as follows: normal, abnormal or nonspecific.
Results
A total of 10,161 abdominal/pelvic CT scans were performed. Thirty-one patients were included (14 women and 17 men). Median age was 59 years (19–84 years). Distribution of IGILWT along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract was as follows: 1 esophagus, 19 stomach, 1 small-bowel, and 10 colon. Endoscopy was normal in 19 cases (61.2%) and abnormal/nonspecific in 12 cases (38.8%). Nine (29%) patients had cancer as a final diagnosis (gastric cancer in six, colon cancer in two, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in one). On multivariate analysis hemoglobin <12 g/dl was the only significant variable to predict an abnormal result by endoscopy.
Conclusion
Endoscopic study is useful in patients with IGILWT. More than one-third of patients with IGILWT have a significant finding by endoscopic evaluation, mainly cancer. Absence of GI symptoms/signs, age or gender are not valid criteria to decide about further endoscopic evaluation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Macari M, Balthazar EJ (2001) CT of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(5):1105–1116
Cai Q, Baumgarten DA, Affronti JP, Waring JP (2003) Incidental findings of thickening luminal gastrointestinal organs on computed tomography: an absolute indication for endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 98(8):1734–1737
Bleibel W, Guerrero JE, Kim S, Leao L, Ghosh T, Kenney TJ Jr (2007) The clinical significance of incidental computer tomography finding of gastrointestinal luminal wall thickening as evaluated by endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 52(7):1709–1712
Low VH (1998) The query corner. Bowel wall thickening on CT. Abdom Imaging 23(1):107–110
Ohnishi K, Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Nakayama T, Hiyama Y, Iwama S, Goto N, Nakajima Y, Musha N, Nakashima T (1984) Formation of hilar collaterals or cavernous transformation after portal vein obstruction by hepatocellular carcinoma. Observations in 10 patients. Gastroenterology 87:1150–1153
Moraitis D, Singh P, Jayadevan R, Cayten CG (2006) Colonic wall thickening on computed tomography scan and clinical correlation. Does it suggest the presence of an underlying neoplasia? Am Surg 72(3):269–271
Paulsen SR, Huprinch JE, Fletcher JG, Booya F, Young BM, Fidler JL, Johnson CD, Barlow JM, Earnest F 4th (2006) CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. RadioGraphics 26:641–657
Paulson EK, Jaffe TA, Thomas J, Harris JP, Nelson RC (2004) MDCT of patients with acute abdominal pain: a new perspective using coronal reformations from submillimeter isotropic voxels. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:899–906
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tellez-Avila, F.I., García-Osogobio, S., Chavez-Tapia, N.C. et al. Utility of endoscopy in patients with incidental gastrointestinal luminal wall thickening detected with CT. Surg Endosc 23, 2191–2196 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0274-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0274-5