Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors for cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder stones after endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cholecystectomy usually is recommended for patients with gallbladder (GB) stones who previously underwent endoscopic removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, in practice, many patients still have GB stones after improvement of their biliary symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors for cholecystectomy in patients with GB stones after complete endoscopic clearance of CBD stones.

Methods

From August 2003 to April 2006, the medical data of 61 patients with concomitant GB stones who underwent complete endoscopic clearance of CBD stones were reviewed retrospectively. The risk factors for subsequent cholecystectomy were evaluated during a 24-month of follow-up period.

Results

Among the 61 patients, 12 (19.7%) subsequently required cholecystectomy for recurrence of biliary symptoms, and 11 of these 12 patients (91.7%) needed cholecystectomy within 12 months. Gallbladder stones 10 mm or larger (p = 0.037) and the acute pancreatitis (p = 0.049) were the independent risk factors for subsequent cholecystectomy. The actuarial probability of remaining free of subsequent cholecystectomy during the follow-up period was higher for the patients with GB stones smaller than 10 mm than for the patients with GB stones 10 mm or larger (86.7% vs. 62.5%; p = 0.037). In addition, the patients with acute pancreatitis had a higher tendency for subsequent cholecystectomy than the patients without acute pancreatitis (50% vs. 16.4%; p = 0.078).

Conclusions

Only a small number of patients subsequently needed to undergo cholecystectomy for recurrence of biliary symptoms, and most events developed within 12 months. For the patients with GB stones 10 mm or larger or acute pancreatitis, prophylactic cholecystectomy is strongly recommended after complete clearance of CBD stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schreurs WH, Juttmann JR, Stuifbergen WNHM, Oostvogel HJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (2002) Management of common bile duct stones: selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy: short- and long-term results. Surg Endosc 16:1068–1072

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill J, Martin DF, Tweedle DE (1991) Risks of leaving the gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Br J Surg 78:554–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammarström LE, Holmin T, Stridbeck H, Ihse I (1995) Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized study of endoscopic versus surgical treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 82:1516–1521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, Janssen IM, Bolwerk CJ, Timmer R, Boerma EJ, Obertop H, Huibregtse K, Gouma DJ (2002) Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:761–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanaka M, Ikeda S, Yoshimoto H, Matsumoto S (1987) The long-term fate of the gallbladder after endoscopic sphincterotomy: complete follow-up study of 122 patients. Am J Surg 154:505–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lund J (1960) Surgical indications in cholelithiasis: prophylactic choleithiasis: prophylactic cholecystectomy elucidated on the basis of long-term follow up on 526 nonoperated cases. Ann Surg 151:153–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Keulemans YC, Rauws EA, Huibregtse K, Gouma DJ (1997) Current management of the gallbladder after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 46:514–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Venneman NG, Buskens E, Besselink MG, Stads S, Go PM, Bosscha K, van Berge-Henegouwen GP, van Erpecum KJ (2005) Small gallstones are associated with increased risk of acute pancreatitis: potential benefits of prophylactic cholecystectomy? Am J Gastroenterol 100:2540–2550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JK, Ryu JK, Park JK, Yoon WJ, Lee SH, Lee KH, Kim YT, Yoon YB (2006) Risk factors of acute cholecystitis after endoscopic common bile duct stone removal. World J Gastroenterol 12:956–960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwon SK, Lee BS, Kim NJ, Lee HY, Chae HB, Youn SJ, Park SM (2001) Is cholecystectomy necessary after ERCP for bile duct stones in patients with gallbladder in situ? Korean J Intern Med 16:254–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammarstrom LE, Holmin T, Stridbeck H (1996) Endoscopic treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ: long-term outcome and factors. Scand J Gastroenterol 31:294–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Keizman D, Ish Shalom M, Konikoff FM (2006) Recurrent symptomatic common bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction in elderly patients. Gastrointest Endosc 64:60–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harris HW, Davis BR, Vitale GC (2005) Cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: is surgery necessary? Surg Innov 12:187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schreurs WH, Vles WJ, Stuifbergen WH, Oostvogel HJ (2004) Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones leaving the gallbladder in situ: a cohort study with long-term follow-up. Dig Surg 21:60–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Macadam RC, Goodall RJ (2004) Long-term symptoms following endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 18:363–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kullman E, Borch K, Dahlin LG, Liedberg G (1991) Long-term follow-up of patients with gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Eur J Surg 157:131–135

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoem D, Viste A, Horn A, Gislason H, Søndenaa K (2006) Cholecystectomy improves long-term success after endoscopic treatment of CBD stones. Hepatogastroenterology 53:655–659

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhasin DK, Malhi NS (2002) Recurrence of biliary symptoms after endoscopic sphincterectomy for choledocholithiasis in patients with gallbladder stones. Gastrointest Endosc 55:451–453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2002) Risk factors predictive of late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term (more than 10 years) follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol 97:2763–2767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saito M, Tsuyuguchi T, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T, Saisho H (2000) Long-term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis with cholecystolithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 51:540–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jacobsen O, Matzen P (1987) Long-term follow-up study of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:903–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Nyol Paik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, KM., Paik, C.N., Chung, W.C. et al. Risk factors for cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder stones after endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 23, 1713–1719 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0269-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0269-2

Keywords

Navigation