Abstract
Background
Some studies have found high incidences of intraoperative and postoperative complications for patients with gastric cancer. To determine the predictive factors for the surgical complications of laparoscopic gastric surgery, surgical outcomes were evaluated.
Methods
Between April 2002 and December 2007, 152 patients with preoperatively diagnosed early gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) were enrolled. Visceral (VFA) and subcutaneous fat areas (SFA) were assessed by Fat Scan software. The predictive factors for surgical complications of LADG were evaluated by univariate and logistic regression analyses.
Results
Of 152 patients, conversion to open surgery due to uncontrollable bleeding was observed in nine male patients, and postoperative complications were detected in seven male and one female patient (four anastomotic leakage, two intraabdominal abscess, one pancreatic fistula, and one lymphorrhea). High body mass index (BMI) and high VFA independently predicted conversion to open surgery and postoperative complications. VFA was significantly higher, operation time was longer, blood loss was greater, and SFA was lower in male than in female patients, whereas no significant difference was observed in BMI between male and female patients.
Conclusions
High BMI and high VFA can predict technical difficulties during laparoscopic gastric surgery and postoperative complications. Particularly, LADG should be performed cautiously to prevent surgical complications for male patients with high VFA. Predictive impact of VFA should be further determined in a larger set of patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographical regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24:2137–2150
Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr (1998) Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 83:2049–2053
Fukao A, Tsubono Y, Tsujii I et al (1995) The evaluation of screening for gastric cancer in Miyagi prefecture, Japan. A population-based case-control study. Int J Cancer 60:45–48
Nakajima T (2002) Gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan. Gastric Cancer 5:1–5
Sakuramoto S, Kikuchi S, Kuroyama S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Kobayashi N, Watanabe M (2006) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Experience with 111 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 20:55–60
Mochiki E, Kamiyama Y, Aihara R, Nakabayashi T, Asao T, Kuwano H (2005) Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: Five years’ experience. Surgery 137:317–322
Kim MC, Jung GJ, Kim HH (2007) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Dig Dis Sci 52:543–548
Inagawa S, Adachi S, Oda T, Kawamoto T, Koike N, Fukao K (2000) Effect of fat volume on postoperative complications and survival rate after D2 dissection for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 3:141–144
Tsujinaka T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Sano T, Kurokawa Y, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, Katai H, Shimizu T, Furukawa H, Inoue S, Hiratsuka M, Kinoshita T, Arai K, Yamamura Y, Gastric Cancer Surgery Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group (2006) Influence of overweight on surgical complications for gastric cancer: Results from a randomized control trial comparing D2 and extended para-arotic D3 lymphadenectomy (JCOG 9501). Ann Surg Oncol 14: 355–361
Noshiro H, Shimizu S, Nagai E, Ohuchida K, Tanaka M (2003) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Is it beneficial for patients of heavier weight? Ann Surg 238:680–685
Kim KH, Kim MC, Jung GJ, Kim HH (2006) The impact of obesity on LADG for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 9:303–307
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) Japanese classification of gastric cancer, 2nd English edn. Gastric Cancer 1:8–24
Japan Society for the Study of Obesity (2002) The Examination Committee of Criteria for Obesity Disease in Japan. Circ J 66:987–992
Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Shimada H, Gunji Y (2005) Prospective randomized study of open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 19:1172–1176
Lee JH, Han HS, Lee JH (2005) A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. Surg Endosoc 19:168–173
Barry JD, Blackshaw GR, Edwards P, Lewis WG, Murphy P, Hodzovic I, Thompson IW, Allison MC (2003) Western body mass indices need not compromise outcomes after modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma. Gastric Cancer 6:80–85
Gretschel S, Christoph F, Bembenek A, Estevez-Schwarz L, Schneider U, Schlag PM (2003) Body mass index dose not affect systematic D2 lymph node dissection and postoperative morbidity in gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 10:363–368
Yasuda K, Inomata M, Shiraishi N, Izumi K, Ishikawa K, Kitano S (2004) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in obese and nonobese patients. Surg Endosc 18:1253–1256
Gadacz TR, Takamini MA (1991) Traditional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161:336–338
Lee JH, Paik YH, Lee JS, Ryu KW, Kim CG, Park SR, Kim YW, Kook MC, Nam BH, Bae JM (2007) Abdominal shape of gastric cancer patients influences short-term surgical outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1288–1294
Seki Y, Ohue M, Sekimoto M, Takiguchi S, Takemasa I, Ikeda M, Yamamoto H, Monden M (2007) Evaluation of the technical difficulty performing laparoscopic resection of a rectosigmoid carcinoma: visceral fat reflects technical difficulty more accurately than body mass index. Surg Endosc 21:929–934
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kunisaki, C., Makino, H., Takagawa, R. et al. Predictive factors for surgical complications of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 23, 2085–2093 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0247-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0247-8