Skip to main content
Log in

Thermal injury secondary to laparoscopic fiber-optic cables

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopy requires a reliable light source to provide adequate visualization. However, thermal energy is produced as a by-product from the optical cable. This study attempts to quantify the degree of possible thermal damage secondary to the fiber-optic light source.

Methods

Using a digital thermometer, temperature measurements were recorded at the tip of optical cables from five different light sources (Karl Storz, Inc., Tuttlingen, Germany). Temperature measurements were recorded with new and old bulbs. The tip of the cable was applied to surgical drapes and the time to charring was recorded. Subsequently, the tip of the optical cable was applied to a porcine model and tissue samples were obtained after varying amounts of time (5, 15, 30, 60, and 90 s). Sections of the damaged tissue were prepared for microscopic evaluation. Parameters for thermal injury included extent of epidermal, dermal, and subcutaneous fat damage and necrosis. The lateral extent and depth of injury were measured.

Results

The maximum temperature at the tip of the optical cable varied between 119.5°C and 268.6°C. When surgical drapes were exposed to the tip of the light source, the time to char was 3–6 s. The degree and volume of injury increased with longer exposure times, and significant injury was recorded with the optical cable 3 mm from the skin.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the temperature at the tip of the optical light cord can induce extensive damage. The by-product of light, heat, can produce immediate superficial tissue necrosis that can extend into the subcutaneous fat even when the optical tip is not in direct contact with the skin. In addition, our study shows the variation in temperature that exists between light sources and bulb status. Overall, surgeons must realize and respect the potential complications associated with optical technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Emam TA, Cuschieri A (2003) How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection? Ann Surg 237(2):186–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim FJ et al (2007) Temperature safety profile of laparoscopic devices: Harmonic ACE (ACE), Ligasure V (LV), and plasma trisector (PT). Surg Endosc 22(6):1464–1469

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tulikangas PK et al (2001) Gross and histologic characteristics of laparoscopic injuries with four different energy sources. Fertil Steril 75(4):806–810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yavuz Y et al (2006) Are cold light sources really cold? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16(5):370–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee RC (2005) Cell injury by electric forces. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1066:85–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cotran KC (1999) Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease, 16th edn. pp 433–434

  7. Lee RC et al (1995) Biophysical mechanisms of cell membrane damage in electrical shock. Semin Neurol 15(4):367–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sabiston, Townsend (2004) Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 17th edn. pp 570–571

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred Brody.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hindle, A.K., Brody, F., Hopkins, V. et al. Thermal injury secondary to laparoscopic fiber-optic cables. Surg Endosc 23, 1720–1723 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0219-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0219-z

Keywords

Navigation